Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌XO ‌

@xncvn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,295subscribers

+169 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002090759634
TypeChannel
Username@xncvn
DescriptionПривет @durov Этот канал не нарушает закон. ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌♨️ ‌𝗋𝖺𝗇︎𝖽𝗈𝗆︎ 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗇︎𝖽 𝗉𝖺𝖼︎𝗄︎ 𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼︎𝗄︎𝖾𝗋𝗌 t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=8280360763 ناشناس:
Created13 April 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xncvn

Growth

6,0976,2956,1966 August 2026 — 6,126 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,126 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,097 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,295 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +169. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,067–6,325 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:126,295+198
7 Aug 2026, 16:026,097-29
6 Aug 2026, 18:306,126no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:196,126first reading

Engagement

75 posts held, back to 13 April 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 6,295 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,280
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
67
of 75 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held75 (13 April 202411 August 2026)
Views total66,384
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTCviews —

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌XO ‌ pinned «فور کنید ، فولدر بزنم +70 جذب داشته باشید. جوین باشید چک میشه»

11 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTCviews —

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌XO ‌ pinned «فور کنید ، فولدر بزنم +70 جذب داشته باشید. جوین باشید چک میشه»

10 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC471 viewsread 12 August 2026

هر کی بیاد دیلیم یه ماچ تفیش میکنم https://t.me/Money_talks_10

10 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC559 viewsread 12 August 2026

سه تا فولدر قراره باشه٫چندتا چنل اول و تو هر سه تاش میذارم

10 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC≈5,850 viewsread 12 August 2026

فور کنید ، فولدر بزنم +70 جذب داشته باشید. جوین باشید چک میشه

Signed ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌𝖣︎𝖺𝗇︎𝗍𝖾 ‌ ‌ ‌

9 Aug 2026, 21:29 UTCviews —

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌XO ‌ pinned «از اینجا یه چک کنید پستای همدیگه رو»

9 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC50 viewsread 10 August 2026

از اینجا یه چک کنید پستای همدیگه رو

9 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC42 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Zb1And2blePackSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

9 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC40 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Zb1And2blePack

What AND2BLE do is ICONIK ⋆ ִֶָ icon 111 𓂃 𝅄 ݊ ֶָ֢ 🧨

Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @xncvn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,835 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

𖹭ㅤپࢪامـپت
@ange11c · 215
3 posts
𝖧𝗎𝗌𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽
@chenpaxk · 79
3 posts
𓇼
@cvhgxk · 289
3 posts
ΞLΛRIS | 🆙️
@ElarisLit · 180
3 posts
‌ ‌𓏲 𝓐𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗌 (very slow)
@eli7dwarfsbora · 310
3 posts
sadistic
@jasperxa · 2,208
3 posts
‌ㅤ𝗃︎𝖾и𝗅︎ı𝗌𝖺 ‌جنلیسا ‌ ‌
@JenlIsapack · 468
3 posts
❲ 着物 ❳ ׄKiׅm꯭ꪀྀིׄᦅ
@KiMiNOSA · 1,805
3 posts
𝖪𝗒𝗎𝗇𝗀𝗒
@kyungpack · 96
3 posts
‌ ⃝𐇽 🖤𝑃𝑅𝐸𝑇𝑇𝑌 𝐺𝐼𝑅𝐿୨ৎ
@lindas_pretty_girls · 293
3 posts
ㅤㅤloxi‘s track پـک
@loxir3 · 587
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌sereıa ’s kıss.
@q1ste · 1,574
3 posts
ㅤ‌saudade : پڪ استاتیڪ
@spxlk · 200
3 posts
ㅤ akio
@vr3ie · 308
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 𝚨 𝚪 𝐔 𝚴 𝚨 ‌
@blueVmoonlight · 119
2 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌bluerina کارینا
@kar1ie · 408
2 posts
‌ֶָ֢ 𝐋𝐮𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐚 ‌ֶָ֢‌
@Lunariaa0 · 186
2 posts
‌ ‌‌‌𝖼𝗂𝖾‌𝗅 𝗀𝗋𝗂𝗌‌ ‌ ‌
@maybebluee · 5,217
2 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌sunlatte ‌سونو
@sunte1 · 556
2 posts
Las Vegas 🪩
@vegasbrat · 96
2 posts
آشوبِ نہان
@AsubeNahan · 351
1 post
🔮ᎪuᎪusᎪᏉᎬ🔮
@AuAuSaveland · 501
1 post
Mona Lisa Smile'
@Daybreakkkk · 270
1 post
‌ ‌ ‌ pygma girl بی‌بی
@derrebibi · 282
1 post
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ᥕiᥒִgᥣᥱss fᥲirꭚ ׂ ᡣ𐭩
@ghouldolls · 358
1 post
٭ سفینه 𝟐𝟖𝟗 ٭
@httpsblachmorld · 464
1 post
Idk
@jkjkjkjkjkproof · 12
1 post
.ᐟ ヤ
@kayasartdump · 110
1 post
ㅤㅤ𝖪𝗂𝗍𝗍𝗒𝖢𝖺𝗍ㅤㅤ
@LadyKittyCat · 593
1 post
سایه ماه
@liliohelia · 2,894
1 post
𝘔𝘢𝘹𝘬𝘺𝘉𝘢𝘴 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘗𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳𝘴🕹 - Be My Player Two -
@Maxkybaslover · 518
1 post
ROSÉA
@NEWlYORKl · 379
1 post
𝑳𝒂𝒕𝒆𝑵𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕𝑻𝒂𝒍𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈
@Night_Hideout · 938
1 post
𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐭 ˢʷᵃⁿ
@o279AWejRUxNGFk · 6
1 post
ㅤㅤ‌𝐒elᦢr𝖺
@SCDIORE · 155
1 post
دژم؛
@soyamkv · 5,217
1 post
VJ.
@vjtkook · 37
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌XO ‌” (@xncvn), 6,295 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xncvn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.