Channel
@xmjsxybg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
457subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003985991796 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xmjsxybg |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 9 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xmjsxybg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 457 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 466 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 470 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,833 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
师傅领进门，修行在个人，望各位学生自行斟酌⚠️ 厦门技师学院 报告模板 【上课时间】： 8.21 【学生留名】： 酱鱼肚 【老师花名】： 小不点 【老师账号】： @gdssvhjkjj 【开课区域】： 思明 【上课花费】： 700 ———————————— 【老师印象】： 去美颜基本一致 【目测年龄】： 22 【颜值妆造】： 8.5 【身材曲线】： 8 【服务评分】： 8.5 【情绪价值】： 8 ———————————— 【课后评价】： 进门看与照基本相符抠掉点美颜差不多，对味交米，有帮洗但穿着帮洗索性自己洗，别的不说👄活不错差点交代了，全身手感偏软型，配合挺好的也会卖骚，总体还行，值得推 【总体评分】： 8.5 （1-4分不推荐，5-7分一般，8-10推荐） 提交报告： @XMJSXYKF （加积分需提供约课记录及出击报告）
❤1
厦门技师学院报告模板 师傅领进门，修行在个人，望各位学生自行斟酌⚠️ 【上课时间】： 8.21 【学生留名】： 知秋 【老师花名】： 顾梓萱 【老师账号】： @gzx05 【开课区域】： 厦门 【上课花费】：700 ———————————— 【老师印象】： 9.5（基本没差） 【目测年龄】： 22 【颜值妆造】： 9.2 【身材曲线】： 9.5 【服务评分】： 9.8 【情绪价值】： 9.8 ———————————— 【课后评价】：本人比照片还好看、服务态度很好不会敷衍、1米7几身高还好没穿高跟鞋～_～、老婆口技很棒口太久估计就要交代了哈哈、刚进去就感觉水哇哇的很舒服、环境整体干净整洁 【总体评分】：9.6（理想型女友）（阳光高挑）
师傅领进门，修行在个人，望各位学生自行斟酌⚠️ 厦门技师学院 报告模板 【上课时间】：8.21 【学生留名】：fengfeng 【老师花名】：麦子 【老师账号】：@mz5211 【开课区域】：湖里 【上课花费】：600p ———————————— 【老师印象】：8.5（人照相似等） 【目测年龄】：21 【颜值妆造】：8.5（满分10） 【身材曲线】：9（满分10） 【服务评分】：10（满分10） 【情绪价值】：10（满分10） ———————————— 【课后评价】：又是一年秋，不知怎的，本已养胃的我，小腹那团火又隐隐躁动起来。凑巧，得到校长福源，榜上随意约了一个有空的老师。遥控上门，在楼下跟老师说好久没出击，让老师主动一点，果然一开门还没站稳，老师已经🐍上来了。经过一段剧情演绎的激情拥吻，这才在沙发上简单端详了一下老师，身材苗条，样貌清秀。然后在老师指导下脱衣与老师共浴。转战卧室老师又A上来一顿激情🐍。然后给我展示一排…
师傅领进门，修行在个人，望各位学生自行斟酌⚠️ 厦门技师学院 报告模板 【上课时间】：8月20日 【学生留名】：👅B（用户名） 【老师花名】：小不点 【老师账号】：@gdssvhjkjj （用户名） 【开课区域】：思明 【上课花费】：700p ———————————— 【老师印象】：9.5（人照相似等） 【目测年龄】：18 【颜值妆造】：9.5（满分10） 【身材曲线】：9.5（满分10） 【服务评分】：9.8（满分10） 【情绪价值】：9.9（满分10） ———————————— 【课后评价】：出击小不点，一个重庆妹子，小小个子，皮肤白，全无纹身。就这么说吧！是我最近以来配合度还有情绪价值最高的一个妹子。课表有的一点也不偷工减料，一进门就会主动热情的坐到身边，交流非常愉快。主动陪洗，在浴室就可以大蟒蛇，上床后，主动口，不喊停不停的那种，口活非常好，几乎能被口出来，人工白虎，非常粉嫩，👅B会有互动，紧紧抓住你的手，姿势配…
【上课时间】：8月19 【学生留名】：儺 【老师花名】：林豆豆 【老师账号】：@Ldd131288 【开课区域】：集美 【上课花费】：5 ———————————— 【老师印象】：好看 【目测年龄】：24 【颜值妆造】：9 【身材曲线】：9 【服务评分】：9 【情绪价值】：9 ———————————— 【课后评价】：看照片挺漂亮的，实际上有照片八分美，进门帮我洗了澡，胸大屁股翘，一双大长腿特别吸睛。说的要求也挺配合的，总体下来体验还是不错的 【总体评分】：9 （1-4分不推荐，5-7分一般，8-10推荐） 提交报告： @XMJSXYKF （加积分需提供约课记录及出击报告）
厦门技师学院 报告模板 师傅领进门，修行在个人，望各位学生自行斟酌⚠️ 【上课时间】：8月 【学生留名】：丝滑 【老师花名】：尔尔 【老师账号】：@xmbuguoerer 【开课区域】：#湖里 【上课花费】：700/p ———————————— 【老师印象】：9分 【目测年龄】：18 【颜值妆造】：8（满分10） 【身材曲线】：9（满分10） 【服务评分】：8（满分10） 【情绪价值】：8（满分10） ———————————— 【课后评价】： 最近非常火的妹妹，据说一堆人蜂拥而上。提前好几天跟妹妹说要约会。思念苦等多日，终于成行。 相见后一个小小的，可可爱爱的，JK小妹妹。黑长直的头发，乖乖的齐刘海。穿着水蓝色的JK服，呆萌可爱天然呆，肥宅杀手了简直是。肥宅们看到不得血压升到190。呼出的空气都带着荷尔蒙，哈斯哈斯的流口水。 沐浴洗得干干净净。房间可可爱爱，很搭配小妹妹。 约会的时候很羞涩，配合度还可以，水多多啊，滑溜…
厦门技师学院报告模板 师傅领进门，修行在个人，望各位学生自行斟酌⚠️ 【上课时间】：8.19 【学生留名】：玉q～（用户名） 【老师花名】： 【老师账号】：@gzx05（用户名） 【开课区域】：湖里 【上课花费】：1P ———————————— 【老师印象】：人照一致（人照相似等） 【目测年龄】：25 【颜值妆造】：10（满分10） 【身材曲线】：10（满分10） 【服务评分】：9（满分10） 【情绪价值】：9（满分10） ———————————— 【课后评价】：感谢校长和技师学院，顾姐姐红休完就马上预约，非中介代聊，很热情指引上楼，进门的老师一袭黄色长裙，身材凹凸有致，妆容精致，交完水费后就帮忙洗澡，试水温，擦拭身体还有脚，接着躺着就开始服务，老师身体很滑，用胸来回蹭你的胸口，蹭完之后开始用嘴巴吸，接着到了最喜欢的环节，用绝佳的口技吸蛋蛋和小弟弟，确实厉害，差点忍不住缴械，和顾老师说想进去了，传教士体位，看着顾老师的颜一直…
师傅领进门，修行在个人，望各位学生自行斟酌⚠️ 厦门技师学院 报告模板 【上课时间】：8.17 【学生留名】：浪子 【老师花名】：奈奈 【老师账号】：@NaizuikeaiBot 【开课区域】：湖里 【上课花费】：7 ———————————— 【老师印象】：（人照相似等）9 【目测年龄】：20 【颜值妆造】：9 【身材曲线】：9 【服务评分】：9 【情绪价值】：9 ———————————— 【课后评价】：（描述老师颜值、服务态度、身材曲线、服务过程、爱爱体验、优缺点、课室环境等）这次cj感觉不错，老师身材高挑，屁股很翘，妆容精致，长的很好看，是个嫩妹，进入的感觉又紧又润，体验也是拉满了，大长腿扛着也是得劲！ 【总体评分】：（满分9.7） （1-4分不推荐，5-7分一般，8-10推荐） 提交报告： @XMJSXYKF （加积分需提供约课记录及出击报告）
师傅领进门，修行在个人，望各位学生自行斟酌⚠️ 厦门技师学院 报告模板 【上课时间】：8.16 【学生留名】：nine rain 【老师花名】：奶思，美萱 【老师账号】：@xmmeixuan1，@xmnaisi1 【开课区域】：湖里 【上课花费】：双排1000 ———————————— 【老师印象】：人照一致 【目测年龄】：19 【颜值妆造】：9 【身材曲线】：8.5 【服务评分】：9.5 【情绪价值】：9.5 ———————————— 【课后评价】：看到姐妹花可以双飞，两个女仆喊着主人，按耐不住。两个妹子之前都分别去过，人照一致就不多说了。进门已经在房间等着，认出我之前来过，都挺开心🥳。浴室太小，美萱先洗，奶思陪我一起。 躺在床上左拥右抱，开后宫的感觉就是爽，两个妹子有说有笑，还剧情扮演起来，争风吃醋，🐍吻美萱，奶思在一旁撒娇为什么不亲我，哈哈哈，别急别急，大蟒🐍，边亲边摸🐻，两个分别👅着咪咪，就依偎在胸前，抚摸。都…
厦门技师学院报告模板 师傅领进门，修行在个人，望各位学生自行斟酌⚠️ 【上课时间】： 8.14，2点 【学生留名】：打开盒子 【老师花名】：沈佳玉 【老师账号】：@xmxjy520 【开课区域】：湖里区 【上课花费】：600p ———————————— 【老师印象】： 【目测年龄】：24 【颜值妆造】：素 【身材曲线】：8 【服务评分】：9 【情绪价值】：9 ———————————— 【课后评价】：老师的很打，房间很大，先聊了一下交完课费就开始上课老师服务态度好，老师口很久，没有齿感，有舔🥚，很厉害，传教士几下软了，就手打出来了，老师有点感冒。希望老师健康平安。 【总体评分】：8 （1-4分不推荐，5-7分一般，8-10推荐）
厦门技师学院 报告模板 师傅领进门，修行在个人，望各位学生自行斟酌⚠️ 【上课时间】：8.13 【学生留名】：龙王（用户名） 【老师花名】：曼妮 【老师账号】：@xiaoxiamen33 【开课区域】：罗宾森 【上课花费】：700p ———————————— 【老师印象】：完全一致（人照相似等） 【目测年龄】：18 【颜值妆造】：8（满分10） 【身材曲线】：8（满分10） 【服务评分】：8（满分10） 【情绪价值】：8（满分10） ———————————— 【课后评价】：先洗澡，然后就上床舔了一会儿胸，然后抱了一会儿也有蛇，然后基本也都配合吧，但感觉期待太高了，有点失望，看群里面兄弟们都非常推荐，但实际体验感觉也就普普通通吧。态度是挺好的，也没有说敷衍吧，但是相对来说也没有其他妹妹那么配合，虽然他课表里面本来就没写，但是我看有些报告里是有写的，然后也被拒绝了。可能多去几次，熟了才会体验比较好吗？我也不知道，但是在去过的…
【上课时间】：2026.08.12 【学生留名】：超级凉（用户名） 【老师花名】：曼妮Manny🌸105°甜妹 【老师账号】：@xiaoxiamen33（用户名） 【开课区域】：湖里 【上课花费】：700-300P ———————————— 【老师印象】：9.5（个人感官：真人好看）（人照相似等） 【目测年龄】：19 【颜值妆造】：9 （满分10） 【身材曲线】：9.5（个人喜爱，她穿这套黑色衣服对我很有诱惑力（满分10） 【服务评分】：10（满分10） 【情绪价值】：10（满分10） ———————————— 【课后评价】： 已经戒色一个多月，都没有出击，昨天朋友发了个信息给我说曼妮在搞抽奖，没曾想我一个中奖绝缘体居然中了个减三张。因为风大不想去，不过这可是曼妮，我朋友前天刚去说曼妮会夹功非常牛逼。那就只能破戒去一下。约好了时间取好了现金就打车，没曾想车子那么多提前了20多分钟到了，只能去买瓶水再楼下等待，蚊子真多，还看到曼…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xmjsxybg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 907,554 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“厦门技师学院（报告榜）” (@xmjsxybg), 457 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xmjsxybg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.