Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 北部外約⚜️𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖊:𝐟𝐮𝟑𝟒𝟗

Channel

北部外約⚜️𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖊:𝐟𝐮𝟑𝟒𝟗

@xlin55

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

310subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002031051956
TypeChannel
Username@xlin55
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xlin55

Growth

3083103097 August 2026 — 309 subscribers8 August 2026 — 309 subscribers15 August 2026 — 308 subscribers23 August 2026 — 310 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 308–310 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 05:38310+2
15 Aug 2026, 20:37308-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:47309no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:08309first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.33%
avg views ÷ 310 subscribers
Avg views / post
22.7
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held7 (25 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total159
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC14 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📍 #北部推薦 #雙北推薦 🇹🇼瑤怡 🔥🔥🔥 166/46/D/23歲 她能夠滿足你的任何幻想~ 跟她約會 是享受極致的誘惑和激情 😀 #12000一節 <#本照 #台妹 #外約> ➖➖➖🦋➖➖➖ 🔣📱 LINE➕ fu349 🔣✈️ 飛機➕@fnu99 🔣全台本照選妹區 🔣點擊加所以外約群組 🔣點我把TG變成中文版 ➖➖➖🦋➖➖➖ 😀 一律見面付現金 😀 不接受其他交易方式 不唬爛不騙人 長期經營 給我1次機會=給自己1次安心 外約交給我們給你最專業服務

6 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC13 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📍 #北部推薦 #雙北推薦 🇹🇼小元 🔥🔥🔥 164/46/C/20歲 北一學生妹妹 身材苗條比例好 皮膚白嫩 五官精緻 第一次報班 乖巧聽話 😀 #10000一節 <#本照 #台妹 #外約> ➖➖➖🦋➖➖➖ 🔣📱 LINE➕ fu349 🔣✈️ 飛機➕@fnu99 🔣全台本照選妹區 🔣點擊加所以外約群組 🔣點我把TG變成中文版 ➖➖➖🦋➖➖➖ 😀 一律見面付現金 😀 不接受其他交易方式 不唬爛不騙人 長期經營 給我1次機會=給自己1次安心 外約交給我們給你最專業服務

6 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC12 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📍 #北部推薦 #雙北推薦 🇹🇼只只 🔥🔥🔥 163/48/D+/23歲 百變甜心的感覺很甜美 水嫩肌膚隱約還透著淡紅粉 胸型漂亮 皮膚白 顏值很讚 😀 #6000一節 <#本照 #台妹 #外約> ➖➖➖🦋➖➖➖ 🔣📱 LINE➕ fu349 🔣✈️ 飛機➕@fnu99 🔣全台本照選妹區 🔣點擊加所以外約群組 🔣點我把TG變成中文版 ➖➖➖🦋➖➖➖ 😀 一律見面付現金 😀 不接受其他交易方式 不唬爛不騙人 長期經營 給我1次機會=給自己1次安心 外約交給我們給你最專業服務

5 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC14 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📍 #北部推薦 #雙北推薦 🇹🇼十一 🔥🔥🔥 161/46/C+/23歲 學生妹短期報 #首次乾淨無套 外貌可愛 便宜大碗試車中 剛兼職服務不多 但會撒嬌態度好 #妙芙獨家報班資訊 😀 #6000一節 <#本照 #台妹 #外約> ➖➖➖🦋➖➖➖ 🔣📱 LINE➕ fu349 🔣✈️ 飛機➕@fnu99 🔣全台本照選妹區 🔣點擊加所以外約群組 🔣點我把TG變成中文版 ➖➖➖🦋➖➖➖ 😀 一律見面付現金 😀 不接受其他交易方式 不唬爛不騙人 長期經營 給我1次機會=給自己1次安心 外約交給我們給你最專業服務

31 Jul 2026, 02:40 UTC21 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @una079Photo

我必須每天宣傳,因為這是我的工作,關於能不能成功一看勤奮,二看緣分,勤奮我做到了,緣分看你了!

26 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC50 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📍 #北部推薦 #雙北推薦 🇹🇼雪雪 🔥🔥🔥 170/50/E+/24Y 精緻的臉蛋 讓人心生憐愛 #身材超讚 完美戀人般氛圍 😀 #27000一節 <#本照 #台妹 #外約> ➖➖➖🦋➖➖➖ 🔣📱 LINE➕ fu349 🔣✈️ 飛機➕@fnu99 🔣全台本照選妹區 🔣點擊加所以外約群組 🔣點我把TG變成中文版 ➖➖➖🦋➖➖➖ 😀 一律見面付現金 😀 不接受其他交易方式 不唬爛不騙人 長期經營 給我1次機會=給自己1次安心 外約交給我們給你最專業服務

25 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC35 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📍 #北部推薦 #雙北推薦 🇹🇼舒瑤 🔥🔥🔥 168/46/D+/23Y 反差萌可愛清純型 高顔值 奶大 腰細 屁股翹 床上超級會扭 😀 #20000一節 <#本照 #台妹 #外約> ➖➖➖🦋➖➖➖ 🔣📱 LINE➕ fu349 🔣✈️ 飛機➕@fnu99 🔣全台本照選妹區 🔣點擊加所以外約群組 🔣點我把TG變成中文版 ➖➖➖🦋➖➖➖ 😀 一律見面付現金 😀 不接受其他交易方式 不唬爛不騙人 長期經營 給我1次機會=給自己1次安心 外約交給我們給你最專業服務

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @xlin55. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,047,873 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“北部外約⚜️𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖊:𝐟𝐮𝟑𝟒𝟗” (@xlin55), 310 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xlin55.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.