不禁言大群
Channel
底价包养(面付介绍费
@xjhfby
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
323subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002684805126 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xjhfby |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 16 April 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xjhfby |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 06:54 | 323 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 325 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:59 | 326 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 328 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 329 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 332 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 332 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 16 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 29s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
15 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 80.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2025 to 27 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/+hnEYyfveq7BkOWI0
❤4👏1
面付怎么做的:
转长包,妹子全网下架 😄
❤3
现在不 #成交 一单发一次了,偶尔发一下,需要客户成交记录录屏的私我获取
#成交 回头客 这老板从第一个群还没被封的时候一直 到第三个群 都在 感谢支持 老板出于信任 没有全款面付 但是也不想一下子付完(因为前一阵子内部出了叛徒,也就是 @woshinihaodie 这个逼,导致人员组织混乱),老板出于对自己资金安全考虑先给了一半,见到妹子后又面付了一半,对妹子比较满意,打算长包 😂过去有骗子在群里捣乱 捣乱也改变不了回头客一次次来下单的事实!😂👌👌靠谱就对了 介绍费三种支付方式全开: 1.付款后见人(可议价 2.拉担保(可议价 3.见面再付(不可议价,且要留真实姓名,真实电话
❤3
从8点到凌晨2点深夜安排两位老板成功 #成交 ps: https://t.me/addlist/7v6PlfN07-E0Y2Nk 没加的加一下 注意诈骗犯 @woshinihaodie 我手上有其诈骗证据 谨防被骗
❤2👏1
底价包养(面付介绍费 pinned Deleted message
Channel name was changed to «底价包养(面付介绍费»
底价包养(面付介绍费 pinned Deleted message
底价包养(面付介绍费 pinned Deleted message
那一堆闪字,一堆表情,花里胡哨的,有啥用,谁不会
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @xjhfby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“底价包养(面付介绍费” (@xjhfby), 323 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xjhfby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.