Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 杭州兮兮

Channel

杭州兮兮

@xixi340

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

8,142subscribers

+5,478 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002671353623
TypeChannel
Username@xixi340
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/xixi340

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

2,4578,7145,585.527 August 2026 — 2,664 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,672 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,685 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,683 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,685 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,673 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,618 subscribers28 September 2026 — 2,529 subscribers6 October 2026 — 2,515 subscribers12 October 2026 — 2,498 subscribers16 October 2026 — 2,487 subscribers19 October 2026 — 2,478 subscribers22 October 2026 — 2,470 subscribers25 October 2026 — 2,466 subscribers28 October 2026 — 2,461 subscribers31 October 2026 — 2,457 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,714 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,142 subscribers8,14227 August 20266 November 2026
18 measurements spanning 71 days, net +5,478. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,518–9,653 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 19:398,142-572
3 Nov 2026, 09:028,714+6,257
31 Oct 2026, 05:082,457-4
28 Oct 2026, 13:242,461-5
25 Oct 2026, 19:582,466-4
22 Oct 2026, 15:092,470-8
19 Oct 2026, 10:482,478-9
16 Oct 2026, 04:082,487-11
12 Oct 2026, 17:312,498-17
6 Oct 2026, 03:172,515-14
28 Sept 2026, 18:012,529-89
15 Sept 2026, 19:422,618-55
12 Sept 2026, 03:572,673-12
7 Sept 2026, 12:592,685+2
2 Sept 2026, 21:482,683-2
31 Aug 2026, 01:142,685+13
28 Aug 2026, 11:522,672+8
27 Aug 2026, 13:002,664first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 16 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 8,142 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.061%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held32 (16 December 2025 – 8 November 2026)
Views total12,731
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 02:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
20
Videos
7
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
31s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1027.8%
💩719.4%
🥰719.4%
❤‍🔥411.1%
👏411.1%
🔥25.56%
👍12.78%
😘12.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 04:22 UTC342 viewsread 9 November 2026

半岛嫩妹会报告模板: https://t.me/hangzhoubandao 【优势】肤白貌美气质佳 【不足】无 【妹子花名】:#言兮 【联系方式】:@HZ_yanxi 【妹子年龄】:21 【验证留名】:野区星探 【验证时间】:11月6日 【大概位置】:拱墅区 【修车水费】:竞拍p 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 【人照相似】:人照一致,颜值高,气质佳 【身高身材】:身高168筷子腿,A4腰,皮肤很光滑白嫩 【凶器罩杯】:胸型挺,不止B+,乳头粉/小,整体手感柔软,粉粉嫩嫩 【湿度紧度】:比比蝴蝶型,粉色,紧,包裹性好,毛量少 【环境细节】:交通/出入方便,房间整洁干净 【个人卫生】:有漱口水/牙刷/浴巾,事前事后都有清洗 【时间管理】:排课宽松,课时都做完 【服务点评】:课表上的都有,服务到位,情绪价值拉满 【推荐程度】:✅ 差评 中评 中…

3 Nov 2026, 04:21 UTC866 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

天气好凉来个宝宝给我暖暖被窝暖暖我的小手

16 Oct 2026, 08:02 UTC≈1,770 viewsread 9 November 2026

杭州星巴克:https://t.me/hzxbk (本栏不要删除否则不收录) 标签打分(包括但不限于以下标签)(支持自创) #日的很爽 【出击时间】:10月1x日 【出击老师】:#言兮 【联系方式】:@HZ_yanxi 【出击留名】:小明5.0 (带 @xmtx521 ) 【开课位置】:拱墅新天地 【修车水费】:竞拍p 【硬件描述】:照片去掉美颜就是本人,身材纤细,小巧的乳房,挺翘的屁儿,修长的大腿,滑腻的肌肤 【软件描述】:有点小调皮,情绪价值不错。沉浸式接吻,服务就是三件套 【床感描述】:水特多,光是亲嘴加亲胸后,就一手水了。 【整体描述】: 10月某日上午,小明沉寂了一个多月的聊天框终于收到了言兮的消息。 “宝,我1x号开课” “那我约1x号头课可以吧?地方没变吧” “好,xxxxx,没变” 时间匆匆而过,转头就到了约定的日子,当天天气晴朗,温度略感凉意,…

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @xixi340. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@xixi340 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
3 November 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @xixi340 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
7 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“杭州兮兮” (@xixi340), 8,142 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xixi340.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.