Channel
@xinxin88100
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
416subscribers
+275 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004317120428 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xinxin88100 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 6 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xinxin88100 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 416 | +275 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 141 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,559 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎰 贤时局白嫖抽奖第十八波 📮 参与条件： 🎫 加入-欣欣的朋友圈 🎫 加入-小蓝莓🫐的心房 🎫 加入-七七小窝 🎫 加入-快乐星球🎉 🎫 加入-重庆贤者时间规划局 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 1 条 🎫 加入-雾都逼友の谈 🎁 奖品内容： 💰️ 七七1P白嫖劵 × 1 💰️ 土拨鼠1P白嫖劵 × 1 💰️ 小蓝莓1P白嫖劵 × 1 💰️ 欣欣1P白嫖劵 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： 贤时局白嫖抽奖第十八波 总计69个自营老师已参与，感谢支持 1.老师生理期不同，中奖后在3个开课日兑奖；过期不侯，不得买卖、转让！ 2.退出频道、炸号，不予兑换。 3.中奖后凭获奖信息自行联系老师兑奖，要求反馈评价，以报告或锐评形式给出。 4.如遇兑奖过期、炸号等状况，经老师确认后，老师的白嫖劵流入群内活跃度抽奖，按相应规定即时抽出。 土拨鼠 @TBS5200 小蓝莓 @xiaolanmeiaa 七七 @qiqi2008q 欣欣 @xi…
休息了，明天见哥哥们
好评➕1
尾课还有位
现在哪位哥哥来宠幸我啊
【重庆狼友聚集大队】https://t.me/xzq520 【老师艺名】欣欣 【车 牌】 @xinxin6861 【留 名】碧空 【水 费】600 【颜 值】 8.5 【硬件评分】8.5 【服务/态度】9.5 【推荐程度】9 【老师情况】：性格好，态度好 【服务内容】：欣欣年龄19岁，身高165，体重85左右，人照七分，身材比较高挑苗条，腿细长，皮肤黄偏黑，比较光滑，胸b-，双臂有纹身。进门聊了会，能感觉出来妹子态度很好， 有问必答，不冷场，有情绪价值， 共浴时候洗的挺认真，洗好后上床开始口，口活不错，无齿感，而且时间长，还会舔蛋蛋，口好后插入，小穴比较紧，日了一会后水开始变多，开始小声叫床，反馈可以，换了几个姿势都挺配合，后入时候屁股有臀浪，很刺激，顺利出货。 【优点】：嫩妹，态度好，听话，认真，日感好。
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
起床了，3点开课，头课还在哦
👍2
【重庆狼友聚集大队】https://t.me/xzq520 【老师艺名】欣欣 【车 牌】 @xinxin6861 【留 名】我心本无泪 【水 费】300（工兵卷） 【颜 值】 8 【硬件评分】8 【服务/态度8 【推荐程度】9 【老师情况】： 【服务内容】：老师遥控上门 进门看到老师一脸羞涩的表情 一看就是个新手hhh 然后就跟老师吹了会牛批 交了学费 老师陪着我去洗浴 🐻有点小小的 还没有完全发育起来 洗完就上了床 老师就开始吃我的小鸭儿 吹了有2分钟左右 鸭儿有点受不了了 就开始进入战斗喽 先是传教士 日了有10分钟左右吧 给我日的累了 老师想让我后入 那我就满足她的请求 激烈对战后 我已经累倒 老师就开始了他的观音坐莲花 女上位 一上一下的 还带有摇摇车 哈哈哈哈 今天不知道是怎么回事 我觉得我有点强还是怎么着…… 给老师日的累了 套套都日干了 换…
休息了，哥哥们，晚安
❤1
欣欣的朋友圈 pinned a photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xinxin88100. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 486,906 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“欣欣的朋友圈” (@xinxin88100), 416 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xinxin88100.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.