Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 全球新闻频道🅾️- @QQxinwen

Channel

全球新闻频道🅾️- @QQxinwen

@xinwenqun

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

854subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001545288115
TypeChannel
Usernames@qqxinwen @xinwenqun
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xinwenqun

Growth

8538558547 August 2026 — 855 subscribers8 August 2026 — 855 subscribers14 August 2026 — 853 subscribers16 August 2026 — 854 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 853–855 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 15:27854+1
14 Aug 2026, 10:39853-2
8 Aug 2026, 01:18855no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:00855first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.744%
avg views ÷ 854 subscribers
Avg views / post
6.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total127
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

近日韩国政府与哈萨克斯坦执法部门联手行动,成功抓获14名以哈萨克斯坦为基地活动的韩国籍诈骗团伙成员。这些嫌疑人已被押送回韩国并遭羁押。这是韩国政府首次直接在中亚地区捣毁韩国籍诈骗组织。 这些嫌疑人大多在20岁至30岁之间。他们在海外建立呼叫中心,假冒韩国金融监管机构和检察机关,以“涉嫌犯罪”为由诈骗受害者。团伙 点击查看完整内容: 跑到地球另一端也没用,诈骗团伙刚逃到哈萨克,就被韩国一锅端了 推荐链接: 88官方频道 待加 88官方频道 待加

7 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

金边市政府发言人表示,2026年上半年警方共清查1.7万余处集中住宿场所,破获139起网络诈骗案,抓获涉及27个国籍的2389名涉案人员,并缴获大量作案工具。 自2025年7月专项行动启动至2026年6月底,金边已累计打掉184个网诈窝点,逮捕3660人,并对107处违规隐瞒外籍人员入住的场所处以约27.56亿瑞尔罚款。 点击查看完整内容: 金边上半年抓获2389名涉诈人员 推荐链接: 88官方频道 待加 88官方频道 待加

7 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC5 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

据越媒8月3日报道:近日,岘港市警方开展针对外国人居住管理和社会治安秩序的专项检查行动,对当地两栋高端公寓楼进行突击检查,共检查200余套公寓、350余名外国人,并发现2名人员DU品检测呈阳性。 ​​​​​​​据岘港市公安部门消息:8月1日凌晨3时,岘港市海洲坊公安机关组织大规模行动,对辖区内的 Sam Towers公寓楼和Blooming Tower 点击查看完整内容: 岘港市凌晨突击清查200间公寓,发现中国籍、印度籍人员涉DU! 推荐链接: 88官方频道 待加 88官方频道 待加

7 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

8月6日,柬埔寨国家反人口贩运委员会公布数据显示,2026年上半年,全国执法部门共侦破人口贩运及涉黄案件112起,同比增长13起,增幅13.13%;共解救受害者581人,其中女性333人。 据介绍,上述案件由国家警察总署反人口贩运和未成年人保护部门、各省市警察机关以及宪兵等部门联合侦办。 国家反人口贩运委员会表示,当前人口贩运犯罪已不再是 点击查看完整内容: 柬埔寨半年侦破112起人口贩运案,同比增13% 推荐链接: 88官方频道 待加 88官方频道 待加

7 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC3 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

近日,柬埔寨警方抓获中国警方通缉的1名逃犯,于8月4日将其遣返回中国。 不仅如此,经澜湄执法合作中心协调,缅甸警方抓获中国警方通缉的1名逃犯,于7月15日将其遣返回中国;泰国警方抓获中国警方通缉的2名逃犯,于7月21日将其遣返回中国。 值得一提的是,8月3日,柬埔寨移民总局发布通报称,自7月21日至31日开展为期10天的集中执法行动,共依法 点击查看完整内容: 一名中国通缉犯,从柬埔寨被遣返回国 推荐链接: 88官方频道 待加 88官方频道 待加

7 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC3 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

8月7日凌晨,贡布省宪兵与金边宪兵联合开展行动,在金边隆边区河边附近一栋建筑内抓获6名涉嫌绑架案的中国籍嫌疑人,并成功解救1名受害者。 据初步调查,贡布省宪兵在侦办案件过程中锁定嫌疑人,发现其从贡布逃往金边后,随即联合金边宪兵实施围捕,并将6名嫌疑人全部控制。 警方表示,案件疑与一起绑架案有关,目前已发现1名受害者。调查显 点击查看完整内容: 金边6名中国籍男子涉嫌绑架被捕 推荐链接: 88官方频道 待加 88官方频道 待加

7 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

8月7日,柬埔寨国家警察总署反科技犯罪局发布提醒,呼吁民众提高警惕,谨防网络贷款诈骗,避免因借款而蒙受财产损失。 警方表示,诈骗分子通常以“快速审批、无需提供资料”等广告吸引受害者,随后要求提前支付“手续费”或“保证金”,并诱导点击陌生链接、下载安装来源不明的应用程序,甚至索要银行账户信息、短信验证码(OTP)及身份证件等 点击查看完整内容: 借钱变被骗钱!警方发布网贷诈骗预警 推荐链接: 88官方频道 待加 88官方频道 待加

7 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC5 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

迪拜国际机场的迪拜海关检查人员破获了一起黄金走私案,一名乘客试图将460克24K原料金隐藏在行李箱框架内带入境。 这些黄金被熔成细棒,并经过专业处理,嵌入行李箱的橡胶边框和内部结构中,使其看起来像行李箱本身的一部分,显然是为了在检查过程中逃避发现。 X光扫描出现异常,走私黄金被发现 尽管该行李箱外观看起来十分普通,也没 点击查看完整内容: 迪拜海关破获黄金走私案,行李箱内藏有460克黄金 推荐链接: 88官方频道 待加 88官方频道 待加

7 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

据缅甸官方媒体报道,安全部门近日在掸邦东部大其力镇开展联合执法行动,查获41名非法越境进入缅甸的中国公民。目前,相关人员已被依法拘留,并将依据缅甸《1947年移民(紧急规定)法》追究法律责任。 缅甸政府表示,为彻底铲除网络诈骗、网络赌博等违法犯罪活动,正持续联合国内有关部门及周边国家政府开展打击行动。同时,针对外国公民非法 点击查看完整内容: 缅甸大其力突袭抓捕41名中国公民!涉嫌非法越境入境,全部被依法拘留 推荐链接: 88官方频道 待加 88官方频道 待加

6 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC12 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

8月5日下午,菩萨省威荣县发生一起扫毒行动突发事件。一名涉毒嫌疑人在执法人员实施抓捕过程中投掷手榴弹,引发爆炸,造成现场5死2伤。 据了解,该男子手持手榴弹与执法人员对峙,并在过程中突然引爆手榴弹,造成地方警察局局长,3名协警及涉毒男子当场死亡,另外2名警员受伤并送院救治。 目前,官方尚未公布案件详细情况。 点击查看完整内容: 突发!涉毒男子引爆炸弹造成5死2伤 推荐链接: 88官方频道 待加 88官方频道 待加

6 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC11 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

8月4日,柬埔寨有关部门正调查犯罪团伙涉嫌招揽从泰国返乡的柬籍劳工参与电诈活动,并呼吁民众警惕陌生人以工作、高收入等名义实施诱骗。 柬埔寨内政部国务秘书兼国家反人口贩运委员会副主席周文英表示,这是近期出现的一种新情况,执法部门正在进行跟踪、调查和打击。 她指出,随着柬埔寨持续反电诈,一批大型电诈窝点已被查处,但部分 点击查看完整内容: 泰国返柬劳工成电诈集团新目标,警方介入调查 推荐链接: 88官方频道 待加 88官方频道 待加

6 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC5 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

西港省警方成功侦破一起持枪抢劫案件,抓获3名越南籍嫌疑人,并缴获手枪、子弹、疑似毒品及多项涉案物品。 据西港省警察局消息,8月4日,西港刑事警察展开调查行动,针对近期发生在西港第3和第4分区的两起抢劫案件展开侦查。 调查发现,两起案件均涉及持枪抢劫杂货店老板,且均由同一犯罪团伙实施。警方随后锁定嫌疑人身份及藏匿地点,并展 点击查看完整内容: 手枪、子弹被查获!西港3名劫匪被捕 推荐链接: 88官方频道 待加 88官方频道 待加

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xinwenqun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 543,909 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“全球新闻频道🅾️- @QQxinwen” (@xinwenqun), 854 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xinwenqun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.