出售 @yemen (爷们) @shangke (上课) @panguan (判官) @nezha (哪吒) @liren (离人) @fuyao (扶摇) @dglive (DG真人) @caizi (才子) @bglive (BG真人) @bawang (霸王) @baideng (拜登 ) @badao (霸道) @aglive (AG真人) @xianzhi (先知) @gaobai (告白) @wuzetian (武则天) @tianxing (天行) @xiaozhang (嚣张) @jiuye (九爷) @txssc (腾讯时时彩) @pangu (盘古) @tianshu (天书) @shijiege (世界哥) @ximen (西门) @aichen (艾辰) @xingcai (杏彩) @zhongyi (忠义) @muchen (牧尘) @longwang (龙王) @q…
Channel
新神话 @xinshenhua 出售中
@xinshenhua
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001916307299 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xinshenhua |
| Created | 7 July 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xinshenhua |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 1 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:11 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
2 posts held, back to 7 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @xinshenhua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@aicom · 1,4891 post布朗 @bulang 出售中
@bulang · 21 post@chengyu 出售中
@chengyu · 31 post公子待遇频道@daiyu
@daiyu · 451 post多彩联盟
@duocailianmeng · 21 post方块 @fangkuai 出售中
@fangkuai · 71 post地主精品用户名2
@ganggan · 411 post告白 @gaobai 出售中
@gaobai · 21 post地主精品用户名12
@jingshi · 41 post蓝狮代理 蓝狮娱乐
@lanshi · 241 post李兵 @libing 出售中
@libing · 61 post力扬 @liyang 出售中
@liyang · 81 post哪吒 @nezha 出售中
@nezha · 551 post欧美高清 欧美剧情 日韩剧情 国产AV
@oumei · 4,8901 post@paotou 出售中
@paotou · 21 post平头 @pingtou 出售中
@pingtou · 31 post乾隆通宝
@qianlongtongbao · 21 post神州通付
@shenzhoutongfu · 11 post世界哥
@shijiege · 11 post世爵 @shijue 出售中
@shijue · 41 post天书/天枢/天舒/天述
@tianshu · 41 post通联 @tonglian 出售中
@tonglian · 31 post腾讯时时彩 @txssc 出售中
@txssc · 41 post武财神 @wucaishen 出售中
@wucaishen · 71 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@xinshenhua named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“新神话 @xinshenhua 出售中” (@xinshenhua), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xinshenhua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.