Photo, posted without a caption
👍2❤1
Signed XiNGRZ

Channel
@xingnewz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,071subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001201432703 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xingnewz |
| Created | 17 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xingnewz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:21 | 1,071 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 1,072 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 1,072 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 23 September 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
17 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 58.8% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 23.5% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2021 to 23 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2❤1
Signed XiNGRZ
笑死
👍4
Signed XiNGRZ
升了 KiCad 6,新配色不错
Signed XiNGRZ
我又开始写博客了 https://xingrz.me/2022/09/05/issue-3.html
🎉4👍4👏1🥰1
Signed XiNGRZ
今天,网飞上线了柯南第 129 - 173 话的高清修复版
Signed XiNGRZ
Lycoris Recoil 太好看了吧,应该是今年最好看的动画了。
Signed XiNGRZ
Chrome 100.0.4896.127 终于修复了在 MacBook Pro 2021 上从浏览器复制图片色彩会变浓、从外面向浏览器粘贴图片颜色会变淡的问题。
Signed XiNGRZ
Gmail 的 UI 终于更新了
Signed XiNGRZ
喔,上一次把李剑叶设计的小东西插在一个大东西上,也是在鸟巢
Signed XiNGRZ
https://sspai.com/post/70058
Signed XiNGRZ
分享一些最近在 Node.js 领域的产出: 1. https://github.com/xingrz/cppzst zstd 的 Node.js 原生绑定,支持 Promise,支持 Stream,支持阻塞调用。 zstd 是 facebook 开源并且提交了 RFC 的压缩算法。特点是压缩比第二优秀的情况下解压速度非常快。 该 Fork 在原始版本的基础上: * 升级到了 zstd 1.5.0 * 自带了 x86_64 × win32/linux/darwin × node-10/12/14/16 的预编译二进制 * 原生 TypeScript 2. https://github.com/xingrz/decompress 一个解压库,支持 Promise。支持流式解压到本地目录,或不落盘解压到内存中。 该 Fork 在原始版本的基础上: * 增加了 zstd (*.tar.zst) 的支持 * 支持解压带…
Signed XiNGRZ
哦豁真没了
Signed XiNGRZ
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @xingnewz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,046,401 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XiNGRZ's” (@xingnewz), 1,071 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xingnewz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.