Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 星火

Channel

星火

@xinghuo1966

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

473subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001607881822
TypeChannel
Username@xinghuo1966
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xinghuo1966

Growth

473474473.57 August 2026 — 474 subscribers8 August 2026 — 474 subscribers16 August 2026 — 473 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 473–474 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 04:23473-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:35474no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:11474first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 30 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 49s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2137.5%
👍2035.7%
🥱58.93%
😁35.36%
23.57%
😭23.57%
😡11.79%
🙈11.79%
🤡11.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2024 to 9 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jul 2024, 14:53 UTC≈2,530 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

2

9 Jul 2024, 14:52 UTC≈1,890 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Communism1976

对于最近讨论、批评以及污蔑观点的回应 我们本来不想回答一些问题的,但是到了这里我们认为在谎言变成真理之前我们应该对一些意见进行回应。 我们发现,有的同志被停滞派蒙蔽了,认为我们是一帮恐怖分子,认为我们删掉了同志们的成果并因此认定为我们是“反革命”“不值得团结的”。我们在这里,对此表示两点意见 我们的第一点意见是,我们对于我们当时在情绪中做出的行为,对频道的订阅者们造成的不良影响致歉。 但我们的第二点意见就是,反抗就要完美的反抗,反抗不完美就是恐怖主义,这不就是马督工式的社会主义? 而且,我们还要提醒两点: 第一点,抛开停滞派颠倒黑白的话语,就事实而言,我们删除的绝大部分内容的创作者正是实干派自己创作的。我们承认并接受各位质疑的同志对我们这一冲动的、情绪化的、不理智的错误斗争策略及其行为的批评。但是,我们依旧想要提醒各位同志:批评也要讲究策略与方法,批评应当是理性地指出对面的错误而不是人身攻击、扣帽子,如果批评不是实

👍1

9 Jul 2024, 14:52 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Communism1976

火炬的未来在何方

6 Jul 2024, 16:53 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Communism1976

炮打自由主义停滞派:革命火炬分裂始末 “我以为在现在,“左翼”作家是很容易成为“右翼”作家的。为什么呢?第一,倘若不和实际的社会斗争接触,单关在玻璃窗内做文章,研究问题,那是无论怎样的激烈,“左”,都是容易办到的;然而一碰到实际,便即刻要撞碎了。关在房子里,最容易高谈彻底的主义,然而也最容易“右倾”。西洋的叫做“Salon的社会主义者”,便是指这而言。“Salon”是客厅的意思,坐在客厅里谈谈社会主义,高雅得很,漂亮得很,然而并不想到实行的。这种社会主义者,毫不足靠。 ...... 第二,倘不明白革命的实际情形,也容易变成“右翼”。革命是痛苦,其中也必然混有污秽和血,决不是如诗人所想像的那般有趣,那般完美;革命尤其是现实的事,需要各种卑贱的,麻烦的工作,决不如诗人所想像的那般浪漫;革命当然有破坏,然而更需要建设,破坏是痛快的,但建设却是麻烦的事。所以对于革命抱着浪漫谛克的幻想的人,一和革命接近,一到革命进行,便容易失望。听说俄

22 Feb 2024, 10:12 UTC≈2,260 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

有同志投稿,认为斗争公社(应该是图中的“mieraaaa”和“暴风Snow”同志)的同志在对待大群问题上前后不一。

🥱5🤣2😡1

14 Feb 2024, 08:10 UTC≈1,890 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

白匪如何报导红军。 央视提到,纳萨尔派宣称要在2050年前夺取政权(播送时间:2010年5月)

14 Feb 2024, 05:38 UTC≈1,740 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

干部问题又被重新提出来。「钢派」说,「把刘真和张华排除在湖北省革委会之外是右倾的表现」。 他们把张体学攻击为「右倾翻案的元凶」,企图打倒张等由「新派」提名安排在省市革委会中的一切干部。 而「新派」则开始攻击由王任重培植的所谓影子政府,即由「钢派」推荐的所有安排在湖北省和武汉市革委会里的干部。 到了4月底,两派间关系十分紧张,导致工代会和红代会瓦解。湖北省和武汉市革委会的存在也处于危险边缘。 由于造反派头头整天忙于派别斗争,他们就根本没时间处理这两个机构的日常事务。 选自——《超凡领袖的挫败---文化大革命在武汉》王绍光 著

👍1

8 Feb 2024, 08:14 UTC≈1,520 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

在保守派建立联盟的同时,造反派也试图形成自己的联盟,但他们的联盟并不像保守派联盟那样容易建立。 造反派都希望文化大革命将有助于实现他们的利益要求,但他们的目标是各不相同的。 有些人想得到物质利益,另外一些人希望提高其社会政治地位,还有一些人渴望得到权力。 即使他们具有共同的目标,如果胜利到来的话,由于资源有限,他们之间也会为战利品的分配而不得不展开争夺。 1月夺权就是一个很好的例子。 所有的造反派都想建立一个强大到可以确保胜利的同盟,但他们同时又希望使同盟的规模最小化。 他们的如意算盘是,如果有太多的组织参与夺权,就会没有足够的位置可供分配。 基于这种考虑,造反派倾向于建立的只能是一种可以取胜的最小化同盟。 选自——《超凡领袖的挫败---文化大革命在武汉》王绍光 著

😭2

7 Feb 2024, 17:57 UTC≈1,320 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

马振华组织边区抗日军政组织制定“红黑点条例”,对伪军开展攻心战。红点条例:“不逮捕抗日同志;营救抗日工作同志;能掩护抗日工作;能帮助抗日军搞情报与购买军用品;不残害抗日人民;应付拖延征粮征麦者。”黑点条例:“逮捕抗日同志;破坏我下属政民工作;侦查实报我军活动情况;破坏我后方抗日机关;残害抗日人民;积极帮助敌人征粮征麦者。”抗日干部战士上门做伪军家属的工作,叫家属把伪军约回家,拿“红黑点条例”给伪军看,讲形势,讲政策,指出路,教育他们“身在曹营心在汉”。同时,开展锄奸活动,对作恶多端的汉奸特务予以严惩,杀一儆百,震慑敌人。 (节选)

👍3😁2

6 Feb 2024, 16:28 UTC≈1,140 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

又一教毛主席拉清单的土匪头子 “在井冈山有两条大地头蛇,东边有肖家璧,西边有罗克绍,不把他们打掉,我们不得安宁!” ———毛泽东

👍1

5 Feb 2024, 17:34 UTC≈1,200 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

一个教毛主席“记恨”二十多年,誓要枪毙的人 1950年11月的一个深夜,毛主席伏身案前,亲自签署了一份逮捕令。 主席要求湖南地方政府,应从速逮捕一男子,并且将其就地处决。 这个男人到底是谁?他到底做了什么,何以让主席如此生气,甚至要在深夜亲手签署逮捕令呢?

👍9😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @xinghuo1966. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“星火” (@xinghuo1966), 473 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xinghuo1966.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.