🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🔖 防伪编号:H178591314064 🎰 🌸浦东小九联合【杏花楼】派送🎟通用半价工兵券(工兵价400P/800PP)福利名额抽奖活动 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 须在开奖后1天内截图中奖联系老师 @xiaojiu25_r 约课 须在 7 天内安排出击或转让,特殊情况报楼主回收活动券 须在完成出击后2天内提交出击报告给楼主:@xinghualouzhu 💁 参与情况:8达标 / 18报名 🎅 联系领奖:@xiaojiu25_r 1. Squidward 奖品:🌸浦东小九🎟通用半价工兵券 2. 音. 奖品:🌸浦东小九🎟通用半价工兵券 祝大家心想事成好运连连!
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @xinghualoubaogao/215 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC | @SHXHLXF/12432 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xinghualoubaogao/218 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC | @SHXHLXF/12442 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xinghualoubaogao/219 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC | @SHXHLXF/12575 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xinghualoubaogao/220 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC | @SHXHLXF/12585 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xinghualoubaogao/221 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC | @SHXHLXF/12597 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @SHXHLXF | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @SHXHLXF (3–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
- Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
- 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
- shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
- Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @SHXHLXF. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
