Channel
@xinbitiyu666
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5,973subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001310319996 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xinbitiyu666 |
| Description | 【转转娱乐☆综合平台】 新人福利： 首充100u送38u 官方频道： https://t.me/zzylvvip 官方群组： https://t.me/vip_zzyl 游戏链接： https://t.me/zzyl_bot?start=pid_89992 官方客服： @ZZYLvipbot |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xinbitiyu666 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
1.9 average views per post against 5,973 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.032%. Across the 2,355 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,164–9,990 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 2.67% and 19.2%, with a median of 8.16%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 58 of 58 published in the window (58 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 109 |
| Mature posts only | 0.035% over 41 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 5,973 measured 11 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:zho · 2,355 channels · p10 0.77% · p25 2.67% · p50 8.16% · p75 19.2% · p90 38.6% |
| Position in cohort | 0.425th percentile · 1/250 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.048% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 5,973 | -24 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 5,997 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 6,003 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 6,003 | first reading |
58 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 58 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 109 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🏆 省吃俭用，还不够大佬喂的鱼饲料 👠 真正的大佬都是真枪实战直接干 #新币体育 #PG电子 #麻将胡了｜大水直接漫灌 🚀 提现：😞😞😞😞😞😞 😡 💸 再等下去，连下个月房租都发愁~ ⏱️ 财富列车已靠站，现在就来一战封神 ————————————————— 👉 点击终结牛马人生： rr69.online 📬 官方频道： @xinbitiyu666 👩 官方客服： @xinbitiyu666999 ————————————————— #财富洗牌 #神话诞生 #全网最稳 #一战封神 #秒速下分 #大水 🚀点击进入游戏（无需注册）
🧧恭喜发财，大吉大利🧧 🕴新币体育-VIP彩金专员婉婉发了个140000RMB的拼手气红包，剩余红包个数0/100 大家快来抢！ 🚀点击进入游戏（无需注册）
🧧恭喜发财，大吉大利🧧 🕴新币体育-VIP彩金专员婉婉发了个70000RMB的拼手气红包， 大家快来抢！ 🚀点击进入游戏（无需注册）
🧧恭喜发财，大吉大利🧧 🕴新币体育-VIP彩金专员婉婉发了个35000RMB的拼手气红包，剩余红包个数0/100 大家快来抢！ 🚀点击进入游戏（无需注册）
🧧恭喜发财，大吉大利🧧 🕴新币体育-VIP彩金专员婉婉发了个35000RMB的拼手气红包，剩余红包个数0/500 大家快来抢！ 🚀点击进入游戏（无需注册）
🥲😞😞😞🥲🤣😞😞😞😞 ⛏把人脉变成钱脉！ 💰#新币体育 面向全球招合作伙伴，如果您有资源群或线下实体资源：实体赌场、酒店、KTV、酒吧、洗浴中心、都可以尝试合作。 💰合作代理分红最高50%，欢迎各行业大佬精英加入新币共同致富！ 🎉今天起，锁定你的赚钱管道，有意咨询 @xinbitiyu6666666 ——————————————————— 👉 新币体育机器人：点击开始游戏 📬 新币官方频道： @xinbitiyu666 👩 新币官方客服： @xinbitiyu666999 🚀点击进入游戏（无需注册）
🏆#新币体育 全球玩家娱乐符号 💱 欢迎来与全世界玩家同台竞技 —————————————— 🥲😞😞😞🥲🤣😞😞😞😞 😆😒😒😒 😆😒😆😆 😆😆😒 😞🤣🤣 😆😆😒 😒😒😒 😒😒😒 😍😍😒 😒😒😒 😍😍😔 😒😒😒😒😒😒 😔😍😍 ———————————————— 👉 官网：rr69.online 📬 新币官方频道： @xinbitiyu666 👩 新币官方客服： @xinbitiyu666999 #新币体育 #国际综合娱乐平台 #全球同服 #全球玩家社区 #游戏无界 🚀点击进入游戏（无需注册）
😃😄😄😃 😄😁😁😁😁😄😄😄😄 新币体育·首存嘉奖 新会员首存金额＞50USDT，即可申请获得首存礼金，最高3888USDT 首存金额 首存礼金 流水倍数 ＞50USDT 3 3倍（本金+彩金） ＞100USDT 5 3倍（本金+彩金） ＞500USDT 18 3倍（本金+彩金） ＞1000USDT 28 3倍（本金+彩金） ＞5000USDT 158 3倍（本金+彩金） ＞100000USDT 3888 3倍（本金+彩金） 活动规则： 1.首存活动不限制游戏场馆，本金+彩金3倍流水提现； 2.首存彩金自动派发到邮箱，会员可…
🧗♂️ 大哥说：每天省吃俭用、疯狂加班，最后换来可怜的几千块全勤奖，我不甘心 👑 #新币体育 #PG电子 #亡灵大盗 ｜ 黄金大盗狂野掠夺，超高水位填满 💵 提现：😏😞😞😞😏😏😡 😶🌫️ 平平淡淡才是真，只是在安慰自己 🔥 老板的选择是，满地劳力士还是超跑 🔥 今晚不冲，一辈子只能坐在马路牙子吸尾气 ————————————————— 👉 点击终结牛马人生： rr69.online 📬 官方： @xinbitiyu666 👩 客服： @xinbitiyu666999 ————————————————— #一夜暴富 #秒下分 #全网最稳 #暴富通道 #高爆率 #逆天改命 🚀点击进入游戏（无需注册）
😞😞😞😏😞😞😞😞😞 🎉VIP大神｜麻将胡了2 · 爆疯了 充值: 😞😞😞😞😞 提现: 😞😞🤣😞😞😞 ⭐️ 幸运降临，荣耀开启！ 财富之门已为强者敞开 每一次选择，都是迈向巅峰的机会； 每一次挑战，都是实力与幸运的双重证明！ 👑 真正的赢家，从不等待命运安排， 而是主动抓住每一个闪耀时刻！ 荣耀属于敢拼的人，财富属于勇敢者！ ⏳ 犹豫就会错过，果断才能“胡牌” 👑 爆奖一分钟，远胜十年功。 —————————————— —— 🥲😞😞😞🥲🤣😞😞😞😞 😆😒😒😒 😆😒😆😆 😆😆😒 😞🤣🤣 😆😆😒 😒😒😒 😒😒😒 😍😍😒 😒😒😒 😍😍😔 😒😒😒😒😒😒 😔😍😍 ———————————————— 👉 官网：rr69.online 📬 新币官方频道： @xinbitiyu666 👩 新币官方客服： @xinbitiyu666999 🚀点击进入游戏（无
🧧恭喜发财，大吉大利🧧 🕴新币体育-VIP彩金专员婉婉发了个35000RMB的拼手气红包，剩余红包个数0/500 大家快来抢！ 🚀点击进入游戏（无需注册）
🧧恭喜发财，大吉大利🧧 🕴新币体育-VIP彩金专员婉婉发了个35000RMB的拼手气红包，剩余红包个数0/100 大家快来抢！ 🚀点击进入游戏（无需注册）
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @xinbitiyu666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 285,302 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@xinbitiyu666 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“新币体育官方频道” (@xinbitiyu666), 5,973 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xinbitiyu666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.