这周的位置都已预约满,抱歉😞下周的位置是不预约的,有空就能直接来我会发频道的(中奖的哥哥可以预约噢)🥰🥰🥰
😭2

Channel
@xiaoxiao720
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,258subscribers
+275 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004349802130 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaoxiao720 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 2 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaoxiao720 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 1,258 | +186 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:10 | 1,072 | +89 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 983 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (2 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,522 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
35 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 91.4% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
这周的位置都已预约满,抱歉😞下周的位置是不预约的,有空就能直接来我会发频道的(中奖的哥哥可以预约噢)🥰🥰🥰
😭2
今日检测🥳
❤5
🎉 大沥小小 @Xxiao0720 优惠福利 🎁 奖品清单 • P半价 × 1 • P - 100优惠券 × 5 • PP - 200优惠券 × 3 • 🧧9.9 × 10 🛡️ 参与条件 • 加入 广州佛山修车出击大队🦅 • 加入 小小❤️小屋 • 加入 修车出击大队推广轮播群 • 加入 抽奖专栏 • 参加抽奖后需在 广州佛山修车出击大队🦅 内发言30次 └ 群内发送“抽奖进度”查看完成度(每日限5次) • 必须设置用户名 🔮 祝福加持 • 祝福消耗:10无限宝石 • 祝福上限:10次 • 祝福一次增加一个抽奖号,提高中奖率 • 幸运值祝福:支持 幸运值说明 ⌛ 开奖时间 • 2026-08-09 14:00:00 📜 抽奖说明 1 半价/课费优惠不兑现,🧧兑现,炸号无效,兑奖联系 @Xxiao0720 2 自开奖日七天内有效 老师因个人原因,需延长有效期。 3 半价券需提交出击报告! 中奖选手已开启自动拉黑抽奖…
胸不巨何以聚人心 https://t.me/+e9b5nbURD143ZTll 💃 艺名:小小 🆔 电报:@Xxiao0720 💒 地点:大沥 📆 时间:8-6 💸 水费:600 🥰 颜值:9.5分,麻麻呀好可爱啊…明眸皓齿,小嘴吧啦吧啦的,眼里有光!!老黄融化了… 🥰人照几成:人照一致的,个人是感觉真人更漂亮了啦 👸皮肤肤色:妹子自嘲黄黑皮,三点黑🤣🤣其实就两点啦…下面还是挺粉嫩的,而且很光滑 👙 身材: 1.有无小肚子:不算小肚子,正常小肉肉 2.屁股形状和大小:屁股有肉的,但好像是向两边不是集中翘起那种 🐻 胸器:罩杯A+!嗯…再给个+吧!还是有肉包子的量的!较挺,很敏感!! 🐍 舌吻:都有的!! 🚬 抽烟:电子~ 👄口活技术评分:9.5…没看错…很厉害…就比水老师差一点了,无论时间深度润度,还有舌头…她怎么这么会!! ❤️ 态度:社牛…无敌了…沉船佬自觉绕开… 🤭 优点缺点:缺点除了妹子自嘲…
【永乐报告】https://t.me/guangfoyongle2020 【所在位置】滘口 【老师艺名】#小小 【联系方式】@Xxiao0720 【验证留名】灰猫 【验证时间】8.5 【上课价位】600p(白嫖券) 【人照几成】8 【颜值分数】8(满分10分,朱茵王祖贤之流算10分) 【身材分数】7(满分10分,车模超模般的身材可打10分) 【课表服务】全做(全做,做大部分,做一半,几乎全没做) 【态度分数】态度满分(满分10分) 【优点缺点】优点服务好 态度好,缺点小只马 黄皮肤 【推荐程度】吃服务的可以 【体验细节】 感谢永乐中的白嫖,这两天看到小小上榜 颜值不错 也很多好评,忍不住去试试 本来昨天就想去的可惜满了。今天终于约上 遥控上门,中间有点小插曲 还改了一下时间,但是老师也很好说话 进门看到老师 妆容不错 但是老师说今天的妆不好看,哈哈 但是嫩妹无疑,黄皮肤 🐻不大(老师课表也有说),先坐沙发休息一下 桌子还有水…
❤1
【永乐报告】https://t.me/guangfoyongle2020 【所在位置】#滘口 【老师艺名】#小小 【联系方式】@Xxiao0720 【验证留名】小汤姆 【验证时间】八月五号 【上课价位】pp 【人照几成】8.5 【颜值分数】8(满分10分,朱茵王祖贤之流算10分) 【身材分数】8(满分10分,车模超模般的身材可打10分) 【课表服务】全做(全做,做大部分,做一半,几乎全没做) 【态度分数】10(满分10分) 【优点缺点】服务十分的满意 【推荐程度】8.5 【体验细节】居然有超10公里补贴50的新靓靓 赶紧预约好老师,指引上楼,见面人照八成左右,交水费,脱衣,老师熊大概是b-左右,皮肤有点点黄黑皮吧 不介意,老师态度好的 一起去洗澡,水中萧都是有的,出来帮忙擦干 上床服务,舔两点,看着老师忍不住了,就先蛇了一会,老师可以大猛蛇,各位师兄请提前做好口腔清洁,也很会蛇,然后一路游走下方,口技也很好的,会…
❤5
再次提醒@aaaggg6688此号现为盗号骗定的骗子,小小上课从不收定 !!!
https://t.me/GZTHYB/673
😀 #南海 #小小 【广州学院】: @gzwww @gzbbb 【出击日期】:8月4日 【学生留名】:#ss 【体验细节】:📰 📰 在频道看到小小老师,马上预约,到达地方遥控上楼。老师挺可爱,笑容甜美。服务跟课表一致,很不错。有女朋友的感觉,也可以提供情绪价值,挺健谈的。老师自己所说的“缺点”我倒是觉得没什么的,挺真诚、真实的。 【总结概括】:📰 📰 服务好,健谈,总体不错 【联系老师】:@Xxiao0720👆 投稿需要提交记录 隐私可打马赛克 萝卜白菜各有所爱 建议多观察对比
课表更新
❤4
😀 #南海 #小小 【广州学院】: @gzwww @gzbbb 【出击日期】:8月3日 【学生留名】:#ok哥 【体验细节】:📰 无意间刷到玉哥频道的小小,评价还不错,当天马上预约。一个小时的车程真的是折磨人,不过想到马上就能看到小小,多大的苦都能顶住。到达公寓后遥控上楼,开门见到本人真的眼前一亮,这笑笑笑是真的好看,好看到已经可以忽略掉脱衣后原皮不够白嫩甚至算女生中的黑皮了。真的,看着那张脸,我估计都能自己撸一发。言归正传,交水费陪浴后上床开干,服务跟着课表一样不落,三下浅一下深喉,全程口吹不带停的,还不用吐口水,事后问一下,才知道都吞下去了,我的天,真的有意思这个小小。服务够仔细,深喉够力。差不多10分钟前戏做完后带伞上马,全自动摇摇椅,抱着小小的屁屁,看着她那张脸蛋,忍不住🐍了起来,边🐍边抽查,123顺利出水。出水后鸡儿还在小小身体里,并没有刻意拿出来,就像女朋友一样,趴在身上🐍了一分钟才开始清理。这个真的可以加很多分。追…
❤1
小小新号@Xxiao0720 有预约的哥哥们方便联系我一下吗?真的不好意思!
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @xiaoxiao720. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 158,465 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小小❤️小屋” (@xiaoxiao720), 1,258 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaoxiao720.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.