今天开课哦
❤1

Channel
@xiaorandepenyouquan1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,123subscribers
+200 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004497923601 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaorandepenyouquan1 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 28 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaorandepenyouquan1 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 1,123 | +38 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 1,085 | +26 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:56 | 1,059 | +136 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 923 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 923 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (28 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,010 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 96.2% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
今天开课哦
❤1
红休了🥹
❤2
真实白虎哦🙈
❤5
头课还在哦
谢谢你的喜欢
众所周知,我向来追求灵魂契合,追求柏拉图式的完美关系,可有些时候,又不得不直面自己的内心,直面最原始的欲望,这两方面似乎是相悖的,但是有没有可能,灵魂契合和原始欲望能达成完美平衡呢? 有的兄弟,有的。 小冉妹妹,就是可以在这两方面达成完美平衡的特殊存在。 首先是灵魂契合,她的性格十分有趣,笑点非常低,随便三言两语,屋内就笑声不断,而且可以很清楚的感受到并非是逢场作戏的假笑,可能这就是十九岁少女的魅力所在,纯真,青春,俏皮,一颦一笑都宛若天成,很有感染力,反方向的钟似乎真的出现了,让人仿佛回到了青涩无比但热烈恣意的高中时代。 其次是原始欲望,有什么比天然白虎、一线天,更能激起欲望的呢?如果有,那一定是再加上青春滑嫩的肌肤,柔软细腻的酥胸,再加上修长笔直的双腿,以及圆润饱满的翘臀。那如果小冉妹妹将这些要素全部集齐了呢?那还说啥了兄弟,欲望控制大脑,直接进入肤浅模式,任由紧致温暖裹挟着快感如峰峦般不断迭起。 当一个人同时具备…
❤3
小冉的朋友圈 pinned a photo
菜单在这里哦
❤5
💎艺名:#小冉 💎位置:#金水区 💎课费:#600P 💎老师: @xiaoran633 💎硬件:嫩妹,身高168,体重47kg,胸B 💎服务:口,做,陪洗,69,制服 💎标签:#颜值车 #嫩妹 #丝袜制服 #态度车 #白虎 #一线天 个人体验: 听闻郑州出现了一位白虎一线天嫩妹,再一问还是天然白虎,出于严谨认真的态度,当即决定去检验一下,替广大狼友把把关,看看真假。 课室位置很安全,妹妹出门迎接,防范意识在线,让人安全感满满,个子不低,一袭修身长裙,勾勒出窈窕动人的完美曲线,来到房间里,才有空一睹妹妹芳颜。 乍一看并不算惊艳,但妹妹那股青春气息浓郁到仿佛要溢出来一般,并且看久了后,妹妹似乎有些羞涩,脸颊微微泛红,嘴角也浮出一抹害羞的微笑来,很有种回到高中时期,遇到青涩女同学的感觉。 这种感觉瞬间就让我泛起了回忆,也让弟弟随之昂扬起来,褪去衣衫,动人的身躯毫无遮拦的呈现在眼前。 尚未发育完全但已经小有规模的…
❤2
💘💘💘
❤1
#小冉 @xiaoran633 硬件 #颜中上 妆容精致,某些角度是好看的。年纪不到20?身高170,身材匀称偏瘦,腿臀有肉,熊b比较挺。皮肤状态可以手感好,肤色偏白,两处小纹身,大腿一个蝴蝶结🎀,手腕一个招财猫🐱,可可爱爱的,不精神 软件 69,口活好,女上技术好。气质媚。比较敏感,水多,屌感好 总结 #嫩妹型。资料本人,美颜美白,气质不太一样,真人有点御姐。大长腿值得一玩,外貌服务对得起价格,没有精神小妹的气质,比较乖乖女,在这个价格是品质之上的水准 分类:人上人🔺🔺
❤6😁1
小冉的朋友圈 pinned Deleted message
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @xiaorandepenyouquan1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小冉的朋友圈” (@xiaorandepenyouquan1), 1,123 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaorandepenyouquan1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.