Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 小柔的🏠

Channel

小柔的🏠

@xiaor312

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 10 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003990191197
TypeChannel
Username@xiaor312
Created9 November 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 November 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/xiaor312

Growth

13191610 Nov 2026, 00:48 — 13 subscribers10 Nov 2026, 01:22 — 13 subscribers10 Nov 2026, 13:39 — 19 subscribers10 Nov 2026, 00:4810 Nov 2026, 13:39
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 13:3919+6
10 Nov 2026, 01:2213no change
10 Nov 2026, 00:4813first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 9 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
335.8%
avg views ÷ 19 subscribers
Avg views / post
63.8
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held7 (9 November 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total319
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 01:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 19:25 UTC19 viewsread 10 November 2026

【重庆集团】专属验证报告 基础信息 【女秘书】:#小柔 【秘书工号】:@xiaor132 【验证留名】:陪跑冠军儿 【验证时间】:2026-11-09 【所在位置】:石油路地铁站出口 【上课费用】:600p(工400) 硬件评价 【身高体重】:身高170,体重未知 【有无符文】:胸口有个较大的“樂”,左手腕有个“發财” 【皮肤状态】:整体白皮,皮肤光滑,紧致,稍微有痘 【秘书年龄】: 课表18,应该无误 【bb外观】:蝴蝶型、毛量较少、颜色肉色偏褐 【湿度紧度】: 湿度6分,紧度偏紧,初入时感觉明显 (湿度标准填写:6分为 湿润指尖、7分为 内裤明显潮湿、8分为 能顺大腿根流下、9分为 内裤床单有大片湿痕、10分为 潮喷) 【凶器罩杯】:A杯,乳头淡褐色 【人照相似】:8.5-9分 【颜值评分】:8.5 (6分中下水平,7分路人水平,8分中上耐看水平,9分惊艳水平,10分出众水平,此括号内容勿删) 软件评价 【…

9 Nov 2026, 13:31 UTC82 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @CQCBDBG

重庆茶百道楼凤总群: https://t.me/CQCBD 【妹子花名】:#小柔 【联系方式】:@xiaorou1314 【验证留名】:拖孩 【大概位置】:大坪 【修车水费】:600p 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ② 69舔逼 ③ 情绪价值 ✔️ ④ 毒龙 【人照相似】:9 【硬件身材】:8 【软件态度】:8 【服务点评】:8 【推荐程度】:8.5 【细节描述】: 先说结论:大杯上 羞涩170高身长排骨嫩妹。 硬件方面:大杯上。 170身高,A胸,嫩。蝴蝶福。虽然是平胸,但是傲人的大长腿弥补了着一些。长相非常清纯,有一种高中时期的同学的既视感。手上有花刀,有小面积纹身。无花臂。胸口纹了个樂,脚踝和手腕有小纹身。整体不影响观感。发质比绝大部分的嫩妹好,整体观感良好。 软件方面:大杯中 首先,没🐍。虽然我对🐍兴趣不大,但是考虑到很多狼友对这个感兴趣,客观评分些许降低。其次是因为妹…

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @xiaor312. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小柔的🏠” (@xiaor312), 19 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaor312.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.