繁花报告模板:https://t.me/HZFHLYQ 【优势】人照一致 皮肤很白 体验感满分 物超所值 【劣势】 【妹子花名】:#小咪 【联系方式】:@xiaomi993 【妹子年龄】:20左右 【验证留名】:c 【验证时间】:10月8 【上课费用】:2500p 【颜值】:人照一致 【身材】:冷白皮 【服务态度】:耐心不催 【时间管理】:合理 【卫生环境】:很干净 【额外加分项】:叫声很真实,冷白皮 【综合评价】:必反 【流程小文】:身材高挑,颜值高,化着和照片一样的妆容,真人比照片漂亮,卡姿兰大眼睛,高鼻梁,是位大美女。人照9成,与频道照片无差。老师刚刚下海,身材高挑,穿上高跟鞋和小姨裙特别有欲望。大奶子触摸起来软软的。 由于我是个i人第一次见面很腼腆,交好水费就一起共浴了。到床上后,口技了得无齿感,很舒服,而且不叫停不带停的。小妹妹下面特别的紧致,包裹感十足,而且水多,很暖,以至于小弟一直处在超硬的状态。做爱的时…

Channel
小mimimimi
@xiaomimimi998
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004391423328 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaomimimi998 |
| Created | 7 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaomimimi998 |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:22 | 26 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 7 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 866.3%
- avg views ÷ 26 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 225
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.287%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 5 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (7 October 2026 – 8 October 2026) |
| Views total | 901 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 3
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 24s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Video, posted without a caption
刚到杭州,今天下午6点开课哦哥哥们!
小咪 @xiaomi993 00年 162 95斤 🐻D 课费 (不议价) 1300p 60分钟 2500pp120分钟 5500下午茶3小时 (限3p) 熟客包夜私聊 🐍吻 无🍑口 🉑69 🉑陪洗 调情 丝袜 制服(提前说要制服) 爱爱 冷白皮 情商高会聊天 妹妹水多紧致 乖巧听话配合 注意事项!不接无套 液体套酒💊客假钞拔套偷拍 不接受口爆 毒龙 后花园!!! 迟到按原时间计算 有事取消麻烦哥哥提前6小时告知 双向联系 : @xiaomi223_bot 约课必须定金约课100口令红包!
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @xiaomimimi998. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小mimimimi” (@xiaomimimi998), 26 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaomimimi998.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.