Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 小酱的🌸园

Channel

小酱的🌸园

@xiaojiang67457

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,414subscribers

+143 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003865213709
TypeChannel
Username@xiaojiang67457
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xiaojiang67457

Growth

1,2711,4141,342.57 August 2026 — 1,271 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,271 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,303 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,353 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,354 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,414 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +143. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,250–1,435 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 16:461,414+60
14 Aug 2026, 02:361,354+1
11 Aug 2026, 01:111,353+50
8 Aug 2026, 01:011,303+32
7 Aug 2026, 22:471,271no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:261,271first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.8%
avg views ÷ 1,414 subscribers
Avg views / post
577
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.172%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total11,532
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
981.8%
😢218.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC205 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎰 杭州修车协会福利【小酱】 📮 参与条件: 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-小酱的🌸园 🎫 加入-杭州修车协会抽奖公告 🎫 加入-杭州修车协会 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 10 条 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 单P半价优惠券 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 刷屏、灌水、纯表情、复制粘贴、无意义对话、撤回内容等,一律视为无效发言,不计入统计!请用心交流。 开奖如果不在群内,一律视为自动放弃,奖品将会回到奖池继续抽奖活动最终解释权归本群管理团队所有。 中奖的人员核实元宝数量,开奖即查,达到200扣除后再联系老师约定约时间(在抽奖期间提交过本群老师原价出击报告可以不扣除直接兑奖),元宝不够奖品作废回到兑换区供其他狼友兑换 24小时内预约时间,3天内出击,过时自动作废 中奖需本人出击,转让需经过老师同意并与管理协商,不得私下买卖,出现买卖双方都将被踢出群里!出击完成后提交报告(提交报告额外奖励元宝)如若不提交,将永久拉黑! 老师:@xj6357

1

7 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC222 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

半岛嫩妹会报告模板: https://t.me/hangzhoubandao 【优势】嫩 , 温柔,敏感 【不足】暂无 【妹子花名】:#小酱 【联系方式】:@xj6357 【妹子年龄】:18 【验证留名】:汤姆 【验证时间】:8月6日 【大概位置】:拱墅 【修车水费】:800p 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 √ ② 69舔逼 √ ③ 情绪价值 √ ④ 毒龙 【人照相似】:9,真人很可爱 【身高身材】:160 90 【凶器罩杯】:B,白嫩 【湿度紧度】:非常紧,水量正常 【环境细节】:回迁房 【个人卫生】:事前时候有清洗 【时间管理】:开课准时,排课宽松,课时做完 【服务点评】:服务到位,无少做,过程无机车 【推荐程度】:好评 【流程小文】:上周末想约小酱,结果课满了没对上时间,正好今天看到在线问了一下,被鸽子了有空,于是直接出发,到达后熟门熟路上楼,见面还是憨憨的对我笑,一起洗澡后上

1

5 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC434 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

杭州颜值嫩妹报告 https://t.me/hzyanzhi 【综合评价】:‼️下面只留一个 #超级好评 【妹子花名】:#小酱 【联系方式】:@xj6357 【妹子年龄】:18 【验证留名】:锄禾当午 @chuhedangwu 【验证时间】:7月31日 【大概位置】:拱墅 【修车水费】:4000夜 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 【人照相似】:人照相似9分,人美条顺 【身材皮肤】:身高160腿长,胸前小纹身,皮肤观感手感超滑 【凶器罩杯】:胸b,乳头颜色粉色, 正常大小,手感软绵绵 【湿度紧度】:户型饱满,颜色粉嫩,水量充足,紧度强,周围毛量较少 【环境细节】:交通便利, 停车方便,房间环境干净整洁 【个人卫生】:不抽烟,有漱口水 一次性浴巾,事前事后有清洗 【时间管理】:开课准时,排课宽松,课时做完 【服务总结】:服务到位,无少做,过程无

4 Aug 2026, 02:21 UTC672 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

杭州狼友出击协会模板 https://t.me/+yI0wXTr_cK8wMTA1 【综合评价】:好评 【验证留名】:马里奥 【验证时间】:7月29日 【妹子花名】:小酱 【联系方式】:@xj6357 【所在位置】:拱墅石桥 【修车水费】:800p 【包含服务】: ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 【身高身材】:身高160,身材好,小个子曲线很完美,A4腰 【颜值相似】:人照相似程度9,本人比首页照片好看 【凶器罩杯】:ab之间吧,嫩妹还在发育中 【服务总结】:女友感十足,应该刚做不久,很清秀,配合度高 【个人卫生】:有漱口水不抽烟,地方很干净,可以陪洗澡 【时间管理】:很准时,妹妹刚搬过来,人不多,提前就在等了 【推荐程度】:9分,已经二刷 【流程小文】:程小文】: 提前和小酱约好时间后,开车到小区,现在小区刚交付停车全都免费好评,地方很安全没有门禁,本

1

3 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC631 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

杭州颜值嫩妹报告 https://t.me/hzyanzhi 【综合评价】:‼️下面只留一个 #超级好评 【妹子花名】:#小酱 【联系方式】:@xj6357 【妹子年龄】:19 【验证留名】: 高群 【验证时间】:8月2日 【大概位置】: 拱墅 【修车水费】:工兵p 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻✅ ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 【人照相似】:人照一致,真人非常可爱 【身材皮肤】:身高160,嫩妹身材,皮肤雪白细腻 【凶器罩杯】:胸型b,乳头颜色 粉,非常软。 【湿度紧度】:普通蝴蝶,逼逼很浅,水量充足 【环境细节】:回迁房,在装修的多,整体幽静 【个人卫生】:无抽烟,有漱口水 浴巾,事前事后有清洗 【时间管理】:开课准时,排课宽松,课时做完无少做。 【服务总结】:服务非常到位,无少做,过程无机车 【流程小文】: 无聊时刷到了小酱的工兵,那还说啥嘞,直接拿下。两个月不见,小

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xiaojiang67457. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,121,465 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小酱的🌸园” (@xiaojiang67457), 1,414 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaojiang67457.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.