【北关情景】好评反馈 感谢大哥对阿信的大力支持 ㊗️大哥🥰 🥰 😘 🥰 ✅点击联系客服阿信 被双向请点击这里联系机器人🤖 西安洗浴会所 西安外围上门 车友出击反馈 西安商务KTV 【西安阿信🔥优选】

Channel
西安💯老司机反馈【阿信】
@xianlaosijifankui
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,253subscribers
+414 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002111228464 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xianlaosijifankui |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xianlaosijifankui |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 6,253 | -23 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:56 | 6,276 | +135 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 6,141 | +24 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 6,117 | +43 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 6,074 | +61 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 6,013 | +105 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 5,908 | +70 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 5,838 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 5,839 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 5,839 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
【高新MT】好评反馈 感谢大哥对阿信的大力支持 ㊗️大哥🥰 🥰 😘 🥰 ✅点击联系客服阿信 被双向请点击这里联系机器人🤖 西安洗浴会所 西安外围上门 车友出击反馈 西安商务KTV 【西安阿信🔥优选】
【三悦水汇原好再来】好评反馈 感谢大哥对阿信的大力支持 ㊗️大哥🥰 🥰 😘 🥰 ✅点击联系客服阿信 被双向请点击这里联系机器人🤖 西安洗浴会所 西安外围上门 车友出击反馈 西安商务KTV 【西安阿信🔥优选】
【玉如意原大唐】好评反馈 感谢大哥对阿信的大力支持 ㊗️大哥🥰 🥰 😘 🥰 ✅点击联系客服阿信 被双向请点击这里联系机器人🤖 西安洗浴会所 西安外围上门 车友出击反馈 西安商务KTV 【西安阿信🔥优选】
❤2
【高新顶奢】好评反馈 感谢大哥对阿信的大力支持 ㊗️大哥🥰 🥰 😘 🥰 ✅点击联系客服阿信 被双向请点击这里联系机器人🤖 西安洗浴会所 西安外围上门 车友出击反馈 西安商务KTV 【西安阿信🔥优选】
【高新顶奢】好评反馈 感谢大哥对阿信的大力支持 ㊗️大哥🥰 🥰 😘 🥰 ✅点击联系客服阿信 被双向请点击这里联系机器人🤖 西安洗浴会所 西安外围上门 车友出击反馈 西安商务KTV 【西安阿信🔥优选】
❤1
上门【初恋-一栗】好评反馈 感谢大哥对阿信的大力支持 ㊗️大哥🥰 🥰 😘 🥰 ✅点击联系客服阿信 被双向请点击这里联系机器人🤖 西安洗浴会所 西安外围上门 车友出击反馈 西安商务KTV 【西安阿信🔥优选】
上门【芭芭拉-Mila】好评反馈 感谢大哥对阿信的大力支持 ㊗️大哥🥰 🥰 😘 🥰 ✅点击联系客服阿信 被双向请点击这里联系机器人🤖 西安洗浴会所 西安外围上门 车友出击反馈 西安商务KTV 【西安阿信🔥优选】
【西关情景】好评反馈 感谢大哥对阿信的大力支持 ㊗️大哥🥰 🥰 😘 🥰 ✅点击联系客服阿信 被双向请点击这里联系机器人🤖 西安洗浴会所 西安外围上门 车友出击反馈 西安商务KTV 【西安阿信🔥优选】
安排娱乐项目,怎么可能找谁都一样呢?每天现场实操的营销和对着屏幕只会扣字的肯定是天差地别。 了解客户需求,掌握产品本身,才会匹配最合适的资源。
【高新顶奢】好评反馈 感谢大哥对阿信的大力支持 ㊗️大哥🥰 🥰 😘 🥰 ✅点击联系客服阿信 被双向请点击这里联系机器人🤖 西安洗浴会所 西安外围上门 车友出击反馈 西安商务KTV 【西安阿信🔥优选】
❤1
【未央星湖】好评反馈 感谢大哥对阿信的大力支持 ㊗️大哥🥰🥰😘🥰 ✅点击联系客服阿信 被双向请点击这里联系机器人🤖 西安洗浴会所 西安外围上门 车友出击反馈 西安商务KTV 【西安阿信🔥优选】
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @xianlaosijifankui. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“西安💯老司机反馈【阿信】” (@xianlaosijifankui), 6,253 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xianlaosijifankui.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.