9 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC6 viewsread 14 August 2026
Video
Video, posted without a caption
Channel
🤠鸣匠钟表🔥定制18k金 原装壳手表 纯原奢品
@xianhuo1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
73subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002105122434 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xianhuo1 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xianhuo1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 73 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 73 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.4%
- avg views ÷ 73 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 10.5
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 4 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (6 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 42 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 16s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
9 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC6 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo
皮蛋圈准备改装陨石盘
6 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC14 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
6 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC16 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo
王子文同款真钻💎腕表！AP女式腕表 全新改动升级各种细节跟足原版。表壳904精钢镶钻32颗2.0明亮式vvs级别切割美钻💎（约1.02克拉） 配备中国gtc权威机构检测证书，一物一证 一表一码，支持复检！手表吊牌 卡片 底盖 3码合一，扫描二维码可进官网查询对应型号手表！。腕表尺寸37毫米，厚度12.4毫米，均与原版一致！表盘饰以Lady Tapisserie格纹装饰，呈现出更强的视觉冲击效果。带来非凡与视觉享受，37尺寸的设计迎合了现代对于大表径女表潮流的追求，打造出女性更为英气的一面，熠熠生辉 质感十足，表带采用白色液态硅胶经欧盟认证环保材质制成脏了可用清水冲洗干净或湿纸巾擦净即可。六针计时石英机芯，走时精准零误差。真真正正做到零售后！蓝宝石防刮玻璃读时更加清晰明了，八角形表壳设计风格彰显独特，活力十足！女款中的最佳经典。
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @xianhuo1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 252,719 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
💍鸣匠🧑🏻性价比款男女首饰🔥饰品
@abc3124 · 2361 post🧥鸣匠钟表🧑🏻潮牌服装🔥衣服裤子等
@Asd123497 · 2,4621 post🍵鸣匠钟表🤵🏻礼品 茶叶 礼物 虫草 养生礼品等
@chayesongli · 3381 post💄鸣匠钟表🧑🏻男女香水🔥美妆等
@wanjudaren · 3191 post🥾鸣匠钟表🧑🏻奢侈品🔥广州莆田鞋子
@Xiezihaode · 3171 post👓鸣匠钟表🧑🏻男女眼镜🔥太阳镜等
@yanjingde · 711 post鸣匠钟表🧑🏻男女腰带🔥顶级复刻全套包装
@Yaodaihao · 1271 post🧐鸣匠钟表🤵🏻玉石 手镯 文玩 和田玉 等
@yushiwen · 931 post
@abc3124 · 2361 post🧥鸣匠钟表🧑🏻潮牌服装🔥衣服裤子等
@Asd123497 · 2,4621 post🍵鸣匠钟表🤵🏻礼品 茶叶 礼物 虫草 养生礼品等
@chayesongli · 3381 post💄鸣匠钟表🧑🏻男女香水🔥美妆等
@wanjudaren · 3191 post🥾鸣匠钟表🧑🏻奢侈品🔥广州莆田鞋子
@Xiezihaode · 3171 post👓鸣匠钟表🧑🏻男女眼镜🔥太阳镜等
@yanjingde · 711 post鸣匠钟表🧑🏻男女腰带🔥顶级复刻全套包装
@Yaodaihao · 1271 post🧐鸣匠钟表🤵🏻玉石 手镯 文玩 和田玉 等
@yushiwen · 931 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🤠鸣匠钟表🔥定制18k金 原装壳手表 纯原奢品” (@xianhuo1), 73 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xianhuo1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.