Channel
@xian_GK
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,534subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002672747880 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xian_GK |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xian_GK |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 6,534 | +11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 6,523 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 6,516 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 6,518 | first reading |
56 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 56 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 56 (5 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,258 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【时间】：2026-08-10 【群组】：西安都市日报 【老师】：甜梨 【留名】：匿名 【整体】：10 【过程】：今天想出击一个妹子，看了半天最后选择了甜梨，到了地方见了妹妹，人照一致没问题。真人比照片更好看，果断交费。等妹妹脱了衣服有惊喜，两个奶子是又大又圆，妹妹很温柔，带我洗澡两个奶子在我面前晃来晃去，忍不住上去揉搓，手感爆炸，很软很好rua，可以说在我玩过的妹妹里面。奶子可以排前10了。妹妹口活也不错，没有齿感，做的过程也比较配合，各种姿势顺利出水。不得不再提一下妹妹的身材绝对算是极品炮架。后入时屁股冲击感也十足。最后传教士体位抓着两个大奶出货，整体来说在我出击里面算很优秀的。
【时间】：2026-08-10 【群组】：西安都市日报 【老师】：玥玥 【留名】：Ycty 【整体】：9 【过程】：一进门妹子非常热情，笑脸相迎，本人比照片更加漂亮，毫不犹豫的给了水费，简单洗了洗，就上床享受服务，我喜欢老师给我口，口的很温柔 麻搜搜的我实在是受不了啦，就要她带套做，叫床声也很好听，几分钟就射了，帮我擦干净，让我躺休息，整个过程非常舒服，也很会聊天。整体确实值得！
【时间】：2026-08-10 【群组】：西安都市日报 【老师】：甜梨 【留名】：Gikc 【整体】：9.7 【过程】：第二次到老师这里来了，上次晚上来，想上两课的姐姐太忙了，所以那天只能一课，这次提前预约好两课，看到开课信息第一时间联系，预约定金轻车熟路。上次尝试了一课，最近一直对姐姐心心念念，再看其他老师真的有种曾经沧海难为水的感觉。进门忍不住抱把姐姐起来，感觉真好，一切都是那么的自然。姐姐性格很好👍，爱说爱笑，姐姐帮我洗澡，一边洗，一边口，真的太爽啦……这次没按老师的节奏来，选择自己操盘，在床上互动了一会儿，姐姐的身材真好，虽然个子小巧，但是身材比例很好，每个角度每个部位都恰到好处的完美，既可远观又可亵玩，老师也是极尽配合，姐姐的口活真的太好了，没有一点齿痕，小嘴舔的太厉害啦，后面又乳胶一阵，心满意足才放过老师。快受不了了，让姐姐戴上小雨伞让她上位坐下来慢慢插，小穴很紧，水多💦女上的时候特别有感觉，夹得又舒服，没多久就瘫软…
【时间】：2026-08-10 【群组】：西安都市日报 【老师】：好开心 【留名】：大家都觉得是黑色金属 【整体】：9.2 【过程】：来之前我选了露胸小短裙，见面后第一眼印象很性感的感觉，又有点可爱的风格，特别是穿着肉丝高跟鞋，穿着小裙的样子让人浮想联翩，进门看了一下房间环境不错，干净整洁，闲聊了一会就去洗澡了，出来后用手轻轻玩弄妹妹的瘦底大胸，热热的暖暖的，那个小表情好骚啊，感受还不错，最主要还是要夸一下妹妹在床上的服务，先调情，再吹箫，非常舒服，女上位，然后又从正面干，换了好几种姿势，骚叫声和水声一起，让人真的没办法忍受，配合着妹妹的小骚逼，顺利交货。不得不说年龄小就是好，b紧水多！
【时间】：2026-08-10 【群组】：西安都市日报 【老师】：夏雪 【留名】：Salome 【整体】：9 【过程】：人和身材跟照片基本一致，人也很有趣，快速洗完来到房间，老师会帮忙擦干。到床上老师就开始挑逗我，口也很舒服，一边口 一边舔蛋 能感受到舌头的波动，口的时间也很长。但我是奔着白虎来的，怎么能错过69呢，于是，丝滑切换到69模式，疯狂一顿舔，妹子逼干干净净的 舔的非常爽，感觉差不多了开干，下面也很紧很舒服，后入的视角看身材非常好，腰臀比绝了，女上也很能动。时候还能躺在一起聊会天。值得推荐！
【时间】：2026-08-10 【群组】：西安都市日报 【老师】：优悠 【留名】：陌寒 【整体】：8 【过程】：新老师自称刚到西安一天，怀疑之前的评价是刷的，没有🐍没有69，照片是本人，美颜了一下，没照片看起来年轻，比较瘦，对A，服务态度还可以吧。
【时间】：2026-08-10 【群组】：西安都市日报 【老师】：小果冻 【留名】：peaunt 【整体】：9 【过程】：今天天气很好，适合出击。进门看到老师长的很好看，一双大长腿很诱惑人😍遂坐下递交水费，老师给了个大大的拥抱，闲聊几句后脱衣洗澡。老师主动帮忙洗澡，主动用咪咪贴在我身上游来游去，很是舒服，忍不住在浴室就抱着老师的咪咪一顿亲。洗完上床后，老师换上了性感的黑丝，然后开始服务。灵巧的小指头不断游走在你的上半身，然后含住你的小弟不断吸吮和深喉。刺激的感觉不断上涌，但老师还没有停下的意思，只能叫停老师，带上小雨伞，开始doi。先是正面强攻，边揉奶边做也是经典姿势，由于前面口的太爽，感觉都快忍不住射了，于是换上后入姿势。老师细腰翘臀，屁股又嫩又软，没撞击几下，就释放了。事后躺下休息，和老师闲聊，老师情商很高，情绪价值给的很足。下次再来。
【时间】：2026-08-10 【群组】：西安都市日报 【老师】：诗涵 【留名】：WAP56741 【整体】：9.8 【过程】：老师人照10分，本人和照片一致，本人更可爱，属于娇小身材，前凸后翘。见面先一起在沙发上依偎，相拥聊聊近况，就像许久未见的小女友。付水费，一起浴室陪浴，全程不用自己动手，结束全程帮擦。回到战场，A面耐心胸推，舌漫，小嘴缓缓自上而下转移至坚挺处，舔舐好久，才整根含住，无齿感，吞吐好久，不喊停就不停。后带伞女上，很紧很暖，技术异常高超，时长拉满，快高潮于是换姿势，在一边喊住樱桃，一边快速进出，成功发射。休息期间一直握着坚挺帮老师测心跳，聊家常很惬意。时机成熟，又让老师开始口，口时长拉满，带伞女上，传教结束。全程不催，喜欢娇小，颜值好，态度好，请无脑冲。这个价位无敌的存在。而且老师很容易高潮。
【时间】：2026-08-09 【群组】：西安都市日报 【老师】：赵安冉 【留名】：小白板 【整体】：9 【过程】：到达地点遥控上楼，开门见到妹妹本人挺满意的，主动上交水费，照片与本人相符，妹妹帮忙沐浴，🐍吻非常有感觉，妹妹好温柔，个子高高瘦瘦的。跪下给我口活非常有成就感，洗完澡妹妹帮忙擦干，主动牵手拉着我上床，开始进入战斗状态此处省略小黄文…… 总结妹妹口技了得，颜值清纯，脾气好，态度好，会提供情绪价值，腿我非常喜欢又直又细，好滑，抗着艹非常带劲。喜欢嫩妹的师兄们无脑冲就对了～
【时间】：2026-08-09 【群组】：西安都市日报 【老师】：娜娜 【留名】：马东锡² 【整体】：8.7 【过程】：感谢老师和日报群的活动！ 实人照是差异最大的，但是反向差异，照片看起来真的一般，见到人却是大惊喜，纯纯的混血美女，没一点毛病。身材匀称，胸刚刚好，大概在c。口活儿有一说一真的不错，包裹的足够紧，但毫无齿感，深喉感觉相当不错，入口也不着急剧烈地活塞运动，而是让你慢慢享受。美中不足胸有点儿松了，不过也可以理解，毕竟97年的老师了。服务态度正常，相处很自然。主动坐上来动了很久，用子宫摩擦的感觉挺舒服，也会主动拿着我的手往胸上抓。遗憾的是不能69，总体来说，想要体验混血和异域风情，五张的性价比是挺好的，有幸抽中半价，那性价比简直爆炸。
【时间】：2026-08-09 【群组】：西安都市日报 【老师】：玥玥 【留名】：不吃青菜 【整体】：9.5 【过程】：人照基本一致，个人感觉确实是新下海的老师，很嫩，口的时候没有齿感，态度很好，身材匀称，无赘肉，户型好，很粉嫩，很敏感，最棒的就是那对c大白兔是真的诱人，大白挺，弹性实足，出门前忍不住，又撸了一波大白兔才走的，喜欢嫩妹的兄弟该出击了，再夸一句，真的挺嫩的，属于清纯范！
【时间】：2026-08-09 【群组】：西安都市日报 【老师】：呆呆 【留名】：大狗 【整体】：9.5 【过程】：呆呆是一个像雾像雨又像风的女人。和她操逼，每次都有不一样的感觉。 她有时候像薄雾，进来时软软地包住我的鸡巴，穴里又湿又热，慢慢吸吮着龟头；有时候像细雨，水多得往外流，抽插时咕啾咕啾的水声不停；有时候又像一阵风，突然夹紧、扭腰、抬臀，把我往最深处顶，逼得我只能跟着她的节奏猛干。 她像大海，我像水手。每一次操她都像出海。刚开始海面平静，她躺着让我插进去，阴道又紧又滑，层层肉壁裹着鸡巴往里吸。可很快浪就起来了，她开始主动扭屁股，或者翻身骑上来，用逼上下套弄，腰一沉就把我整根吞到底，再慢慢抬起来，穴口咬着龟头不肯松开。那种不确定感就是挑战——不知道她下一秒会突然夹紧，还是把腿掰开求我狠狠往子宫口撞。 我只能死死抓住她的腰或者腿，像抓住船舷，跟着她的起伏猛干。她的骚穴会一下下收缩，把鸡巴箍得死死的；有时她会叫着让我再深一点，…
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @xian_GK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 295,310 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“西安车评榜” (@xian_GK), 6,534 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xian_GK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.