Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 外流吃瓜🍉(每日更新)

Channel

外流吃瓜🍉(每日更新)

@xiali90

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,694subscribers

+74 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002594890243
TypeChannel
Username@xiali90
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xiali90

Growth

2,6202,6942,6578 August 2026 — 2,620 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,621 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,633 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,642 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,649 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,665 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,678 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,694 subscribers8 August 202628 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,609–2,705 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 08:472,694+16
25 Aug 2026, 02:362,678+13
21 Aug 2026, 09:352,665+16
18 Aug 2026, 19:472,649+7
15 Aug 2026, 19:062,642+9
12 Aug 2026, 03:522,633+12
8 Aug 2026, 23:562,621+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:212,620first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 09m
Average length
9m 15s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2395.8%
👍14.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 November 2025 to 21 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Dec 2025, 09:45 UTC≈4,630 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @av5224Photo

👑👑👑本月優惠福利來啦👑👑👑 🎆🎆🎆限時本月31號之前🎆🎆🎆 🎀約一節選一個福利 🎀約二節選二個福利 🎀約三節選三個福利 ➡️以此類推➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️ 福利: 1️⃣永久免車資 2️⃣永久免房費 3️⃣永久半價約妹 4️⃣每次約妹送黑絲 5️⃣第二節半價優惠 6️⃣包夜送3萬優惠卷 7️⃣每次享1萬優惠卷 8️⃣無套或特殊服務免費 9️⃣伴遊妹遊艇陪游一天 1️⃣0️⃣伴遊妹最低價陪一夜 1️⃣1️⃣每次約妹享情趣套裝一套 🔣聯絡方式: 📱電報:@xlav525 📱line:tea58 ⭐Gleezy:wtea58 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

9

11 Dec 2025, 07:36 UTC≈6,310 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @av5224

#最新出爐高中生兼職 不能錯過的學生妹 約起來 貝拉152cm.40kg.B奶.18歲⭐ 在校高中生 年輕可愛#短髮 小梨155cm.41kg.小Ccup.18歲⭐ 身材纖細 水靈靈蘿莉裝扮 一線鮑經驗少【+1000可無套】 萌萌162cm.44kg.C奶cup.18歲⭐ 清純氣質外表 舞蹈正妹嫩漂亮 淺淺154cm.40kg.B+cup.18歲⭐ #短髮年輕可愛嫩妹 剛成年滿18歲 十一158cm.46kg.Ecup.18歲⭐ 比同齡的發育的早.有傲人胸圍 嫩白膚色【+2000私底下可無套】 ============🍅================ 📱密我 ➡️LINEtea58 📱密我 ➡️xlav525 ⭐密我 ➡️Gleezy 🥹獨家正妹 🥹 🍒客評專區 🩲 😉新手手冊😉 😛外流吃瓜 😛 💞二次元界💞 ➡️小琳心情 ⬅️ 💞一鍵鎖定小琳的世界➡️點我呀⬅️

2 Dec 2025, 10:26 UTC≈2,200 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @av5224

👑👑👑本月優惠福利來啦👑👑👑 🎆🎆🎆限時本月31號之前🎆🎆🎆 🎀約一節選一個福利 🎀約二節選二個福利 🎀約三節選三個福利 ➡️以此類推➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️ 福利: 1️⃣永久免車資 2️⃣永久免房費 3️⃣永久半價約妹 4️⃣每次約妹送黑絲 5️⃣第二節半價優惠 6️⃣包夜送3萬優惠卷 7️⃣每次享1萬優惠卷 8️⃣無套或特殊服務免費 9️⃣伴遊妹遊艇陪游一天 1️⃣0️⃣伴遊妹最低價陪一夜 1️⃣1️⃣每次約妹享情趣套裝一套 🔣聯絡方式: 📱電報:@xlav525 📱line:tea58 ⭐Gleezy:wtea58 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

3

1 Dec 2025, 07:44 UTC≈5,720 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @av5224Video

❤️巨乳學生妹 罕見極品 ❤️雙北可約 158/H/19 ❤️6000一節 機會難得 ❤️偷偷告訴妳可無套哦 ❤️反差風騷 表面清純學生妹 ❤️私下叫爸爸求幹 會主動掰開小穴讓你進來

2

30 Nov 2025, 13:49 UTC≈4,860 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @av5224

華航空姐誰要約!!!!!

2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xiali90. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 378,695 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“外流吃瓜🍉(每日更新)” (@xiali90), 2,694 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiali90.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.