Channel
@xi328
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
25subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003544025583 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xi328 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 30 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xi328 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 25 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 25 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (30 May 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 273 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
最近盜號以及各種詐騙橫行 已看到不少人的賬號變成不是自己的。 夏夏在這邊做一個~減少被盜風險的防範 [不保證一定不會，但是可以保險一些] 防止盜號‼️預防盜號‼️ 電腦版/手機版一律‼️ 用上述方式先關閉掉【自動下載】 找到[settings]→點開[Advanced]→點擊[In private chats]+[In groups]+[In channels]逐個點擊進去把[Files]關掉 【最後一定要點擊保存才會成功，也就是[Save]】 也可以根據上圖步驟去設定‼️ 1️⃣避免私訊傳【病毒檔案】給你,系統自動下載 2️⃣避免頻道/群組有【病毒檔案】,系統自動下載 立馬設定【兩步驟驗證】+【驗證郵箱】 找到[settings]→打開[Privacy and Security]→開始設定[Two-Step Verification]+以及[Login Email] 也可以根據上圖步驟去設定‼️ 最後‼️ 請勿亂點連接…
為了避免你我賬號某天突然不在自己手上 還請可以多多加入夏夏的官方論壇 www.tw226.com 以做備用🙏 夏夏賬號不見會第一時間公告在論壇裡‼️ 你們賬號不在也可以透過論壇找到夏夏‼️
剛剛有一個 2023 年就跟我約過的老顧客重新找到我 他今天剛好出差，想找個時間放鬆一下 但又一直卡在猶豫不決。 一問才知道，他之前遇到了很不負責任的不良總機 打槍之後房間被轉接騷擾甚至威脅 搞得他現在心有餘悸，非常害怕給房號。 說真的，夏夏非常理解哥哥們曾經被劣質同行傷害過的戒備心。 他是我的熟客，我當然相信他的為人，我也確定知道他肯定是有開好房間的，但我手底下出勤的妹妹們，並不清楚你是什麼樣的為人跟處事風格，對於一切來說 跟古代的盲婚啞嫁沒有區別。 💡為什麼夏夏堅持一定要有確切房號才安排出發？ 這是對妹妹人身安全最基礎的保障： 妹妹們獨自出門，一個明確的房號是她們唯一的安全屏障，也是證明哥哥確實入住、真的有誠意安排的憑證。 誠意不是口頭說說而已： 我們沒辦法只憑一句：我真的在房間了、真的開好了 就直接讓妹子盲目跑一趟。 有了確切房號，大家安排起來都踏實，也不浪費彼此的時間。 🛡夏夏的保證與原則 絕對誠信，守口如瓶…
別讓一時衝動，變成一輩子的後悔‼️ 最近越來越多哥哥分享 約會過程中遇到的仙人跳套路 不只損失金錢，甚至還可能遭到恐嚇、勒索，真的不得不提高警覺‼️ ⚠️常見仙人跳手法 ❌到現場後冒出自稱男友、老公或朋友的人。 ❌利用偷拍照片、影片威脅索取高額賠償。 ❌藉口發生糾紛，要求私下和解、轉帳。 ❌多人圍堵施壓，不斷要求付款才能離開。 ❌假借警方、黑道等名義進行恐嚇。 ✅如何降低風險？ ✔️選擇值得信任、經營穩定的店家。 ✔️第一次見面盡量選擇安全、公開的場所。 ✔️不隨意透露個人身分、住址或工作資訊。 ✔️不接受臨時要求的匯款、轉帳或點數付款。 ✔️發現情況不對，立刻離開現場，不要逞強。 🚨如果真的遇到了怎麼辦？ ✅保持冷靜，不要與對方發生衝突。 ✅不要因恐嚇而急著付款。 ✅保留聊天紀錄、通話紀錄等相關證據。 ✅必要時立即報警，尋求警方協助。 💡記住一句話： 真正安全的約會，不需要靠恐嚇成交。 不要因為一時衝動，而讓辛苦賺來…
最近詐騙集團真的瘋狂到沒底線‼️ 聽好幾位客人說，找別間外送約妹 聊到後面要確定時間的時候 需要轉U才可以訂女生時間😱 後面才了解到，原來是詐騙冒用那間茶莊的名字以及所有內容😡 就是為了吸引客人加入轉U進行詐騙‼️ 現在的新型詐騙‼️手段非常下三濫‼️ 專門盯優質頻道，直接複製一模一樣的名稱、頭像和發文內容🤬 弄個山寨版在暗地裡主動私訊客人、騙取錢財。導致不僅名譽被毀，客人也平白無故損失了辛苦錢‼️ 甚至還會影響到外送茶的信譽問題‼️ 🔰約外送QA，請大家牢記以免被騙： Q：要線上交易、匯款、買點數的？ A： 絕對是詐騙！ Q：要求先給定金、押金、保留女生時間 A： 絕對是詐騙！ 茶客夏，夏夏家只有一種營業模式： 【見面滿意，現金消費】 ‼️不管對方編了多好聽的話、找了多可憐的藉口，只要人還沒見到就叫你先掏錢，100%是假帳號！ 出門消費圖的是開心與安全 為了保護大家，夏夏必須要先公示‼️ 請各位寶貝們擦亮眼睛 私…
✨夏夏的小建議 ✨ 想要約到正妹、優質好妹， 體驗完美不踩雷嗎？ 記得提前預約是最高原則唷！ 為了幫大家把關最高品質 請參考以下的預約攻略： [當天臨時約]➜提前2-4小時告知。 [完美不踩雷]➜提前1-3天卡位！ 💌預約時請主動提供： ‼️您的喜好與雷區 💰大概的預算範圍 ⏰具體的過來時間 提早確認，夏夏才能幫你安排最完美的靈魂伴侶！ 趕快私訊夏夏預約吧‼️
我真的會謝欸😅 加LINE不要 加TG沒有 下Gleezy不要 給手機號不要 最後跟我說17歲😳 還問我為什麼17歲不行 阿喂‼️ 弟弟你去問問台灣法律刑不刑呢❓ 重申‼️ 用Gleezy加夏夏了解的 用訪客狀態加入的 夏夏一律會不回復‼️ 要麼就是加入夏夏為好友 要就用確定的聊天軟體進行預約唷‼️ ‼️然後‼️很重要‼️ ‼️夏夏家沒有未滿妹妹‼️ ‼️也沒有在接未成年客人‼️ ⚠️有在上學的 先好好學習‼️ 不要用父母的錢出來花錢打炮‼️ ⚠️沒有在上學 在打工養自己的 先存錢，成年再來約個正妹犒賞自己
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @xi328. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 65,303 of 1,602,887entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“茶客夏約會小知識🎓” (@xi328), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xi328.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.