Channel
@xgrj66
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,384subscribers
-72 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002222821341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @xgrj4 @xgrj66 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xgrj66 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 2,384 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 2,384 | -23 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 2,407 | -34 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:41 | 2,441 | -15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 2,456 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (14 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,671 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6203789425361558645 | 1 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 东南亚吃瓜悬赏令 📢 ◒迪拜曝光|迪拜新闻◒ 迪拜资讯 📢 soso东南亚-百科🌍 📢 东南亚大事件｜大事件曝光 📢 东南亚新闻网 📢 泰国越南马来西亚新闻曝光 📢 东南亚风云大小事 📢 温州妩媚 📢 广东同城头条新闻 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口：@sooo
#金边跳楼后续：人已经被救下，随地大小睡，散会～ 订阅频道 @xgrj4 投稿 @bljxpg
#网友反馈：🇰🇭金边桑园区一中国男子试图跳楼，目前警方已到达现场 订阅频道 @xgrj4 投稿 @bljxpg
实时消息：综合多位网友早上反馈来的消息，今日特区开展大检查的消息已实锤。 目前，不止一号公馆被查，还有猛塞一栋检查，隆誉酒店旁也在检查，同时，现在特区大街上也有好多警察。 据现场实时消息：目前已经有一批人被抓了！！！ 订阅频道 @xgrj4 投稿 @bljxpg
🇱🇰 斯里兰卡批准国家政策，加强打击金融犯罪 2026年7月14日，斯里兰卡内阁已批准《2026—2030年斯里兰卡防止洗钱、打击恐怖主义融资及防范大规模杀伤性武器扩散融资国家政策》。 该提案由总统兼财政、经济稳定与国家政策部长阿努拉·库马拉·迪萨纳亚克（Anura Kumara Dissanayake）提交。 这项政策是依据斯里兰卡中央银行金融情报中心（Financial Intelligence Unit）于2024/2025年度开展的第三次国家金融犯罪风险评估制定的，并符合金融行动特别工作组（FATF）制定的国际标准。 斯里兰卡政府表示，洗钱、恐怖主义融资以及大规模杀伤性武器扩散融资，对斯里兰卡经济和全球金融体系均构成严重威胁。 随着科技迅速发展，金融交易日益复杂，识别和防范犯罪分子利用各种手段掩盖非法活动变得愈发困难。 新政策旨在进一步完善斯里兰卡应对上述金融风险的制度框架，确保符合国际标准，并增强公众对该国…
custom 62037894253615586451
#实时新闻：老挝金三角特区“壹号公馆”来了一堆治安局和老挝警察 目前到一号公馆一期4栋，正在敲门！ ps：检查是真的，各位有事的小伙伴躲起来，躲好。 订阅频道 @xgrj4 投稿 @bljxpg
#泰国资讯：调整免签政策！取消93国60天免签，59国获30天免签待遇 据泰媒报道：7月14日，泰国总理府副发言人普洛塔莱透露，当日内阁会议审议并批准了对泰国免签政策及其他签证便利措施的重新调整方案。此次调整旨在确保外国游客便利政策与当前形势相适应，堵塞安全漏洞，防止签证权益被滥用，同时减少政策重叠，坚持“一国一权益”原则。 本次调整的核心内容是：取消此前93个国家和地区原本享有的旅游、短期工作或短期商务联系免签入境待遇（即可停留不超过60天）。 泰方表示，由于60天停留期限较长，可能存在被部分人员利用从事非法活动或与旅游目的不符行为的情况。因此，政府将根据各国具体情况，综合考虑经济因素、国家安全、国际关系及互惠原则，重新授予相应签证权益。 新措施具体如下： 一、59个国家和地区获30天免签待遇 共有59个国家和地区将获得旅游免签待遇，入境后可停留不超过30天。其中新增6个国家获得30天免签资格，分别为：印度、克罗地亚…
中国赞赏东帝汶迅速打击网络诈骗呼叫中心 强调加强跨国执法合作 据东帝汶本地媒体7月14日消息——中国驻东帝汶大使王文丽表示，中国政府坚定反对网络赌博和网络诈骗等违法犯罪活动，并将继续加强与东帝汶政府合作，共同预防和打击跨国犯罪。 王文丽是在当天于帝力总统府会见东帝汶总统后作出上述表示。她指出，双方在会谈中讨论了网络赌博及诈骗中心问题，中国政府也向东帝汶方面重申了在这一问题上的官方立场。 王文丽表示：“中国政府始终坚定打击网络赌博和网络诈骗活动。去年5月，我们已向东帝汶政府通报了网络诈骗所带来的风险和威胁。” 王文丽对东帝汶政府，特别是东帝汶国家警察（PNTL）和刑事科学调查警察（PCIC）迅速采取行动表示高度赞赏，认为有关部门高效开展执法行动，有力打击了相关网络犯罪组织。 她说：“我们高度赞赏东帝汶政府，特别是PNTL和PCIC迅速、高效开展行动，打击这些网络犯罪。” 她强调，中国政府将继续加强与包括东帝汶在内的东南亚各…
#群友投稿：我出来东南亚也有几年了，现在每天的生活都差不多，睁眼就是电脑，聊天，找客户，熬夜，睡觉，然后第二天继续重复。 时间久了，人都快活成机器了。每天唯一能让我提点神的，就是嚼几颗榔子，喝杯咖啡，抽两根烟。榔子不吃，浑身没劲；咖啡不喝，眼睛睁不开；客户不谈，钱包难受，会所不去，小弟弟抗议。 好不容易发了工资，我也会约几个兄弟出去吃顿饭，喝点酒，或者找个地方放松一下。有人觉得花钱浪费，可我觉得，人一直绷着，迟早会疯。 出来东南亚，我从来没觉得自己是什么追梦的人，我就是个普通人。出来，无非就是为了挣钱。当然，也喜欢漂亮女人。男人嘛，说不好听一点，拼死拼活赚钱，不就是为了让自己的日子过得舒服一点。每天给客户画饼，给别人提供情绪价值，轮到自己的时候，总得给自己一点快乐，不然天天除了电脑就是键盘，除了业绩就是压力，人迟早会把自己熬废。 在这里待久了，我也看明白了。今天还能坐在办公室跟兄弟吹牛，明天可能就搬地方；今天还能一起吃夜…
#网友爆料：此人外号阿木，名字世豪，飞机网名：木。中国海南海口人，年龄32岁，身高170cm，体型较胖。现位于缅甸御龙湾10排3栋3楼【恒福公司】。 此人来缅甸亚太已经工作7年多、近8年的时间，今年一月份才搬去御龙湾。此人不仅担任公司大主管，另外还持有公司数百万元人民币的股份投资，是利益深度绑定的核心骨干。全公司约200人左右，主要从事面向国内外的精聊诈骗以及色粉项目，员工绝大部分为中国同胞。 表面上给福建老板打工，内心却极其看不起福建人。他在聊天记录里公开吐槽、狂妄贬低福建人，称福建人就知道画饼、吹牛逼。 相关聊天记录已全部存证。我想知道，福建的老板们、同行们，听到你们手下的人这么咬你们，你们怎么看？特别是恒福公司负责人九哥。 公司专门针对中国人实施色粉项目诈骗，以及国内精聊、刷单等诈骗项目，坑害了无数中国人的血汗钱。另外，还有欧美精聊，目前阿木正在其外号卡卡团队公司学习项目。 据爆料，此公司每天逼迫员工工作长达18…
#小姐姐投稿：姐妹们，很多中国男人对自己真正爱的女人，其实是很有情商的。 你们看看那些嫁给中国男人的菲律宾女人，很多都被照顾得很好，被当成皇后一样宠着。丈夫会帮忙做家务，也会照顾妻子。 他们对自己真正爱的女人就是这样。就连中国男人对娶了同胞的中国妻子，很多也是很疼爱、很体贴的。但是，如果你的另一半从来没有向你展现过情绪价值，也没有给予你情感上的关心，那说明他并没有真正地爱你。其实你们自己心里最清楚。 因为我看到很多在这里的菲律宾姐妹，总是拿“我老公没有情商”当借口，为对方开脱，只是为了掩盖一个事实——他其实并不是真的爱你。也许他只是需要你，而不是爱你。想到这里，真的很让人心痛。😥 订阅频道 @xgrj4 投稿 @bljxpg
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @xgrj66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,098,261 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“西港日记/柬埔寨大事件” (@xgrj66), 2,384 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xgrj66.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.