【温馨提示】:作业反馈仅供参考 注:提交作业反馈需要约课记录 【验证留名】:canyou kobe 【验证老师】:雨雨 @yu19yu19 【验证地址】:浦东 【验证时间】:8月1日 【修车水费】:6P 【服务内容】:有 【颜值身材】:9.5分 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:年轻高挑 【推荐程度】:较好 【过程描述】:课室很好找,大楼临街,没有门禁。老师遥控上楼,是一间两室的日租,老师自住里间,外间上课。老师一身萝莉装,身材瘦高,长发,忽闪着一双大眼睛,颜值9分。先慢慢聊天,一声声“哥哥”,把人叫得浑身里外酥痒。退衣一起冲凉,老师帮着打沐浴露,我也给老师打沐浴露。老师胸虽不大,非常挺拔,头儿一点点大。肚子上没有一丝赘肉,小腹平坦。上床后老师给三点口,没有齿感,很尽力。带雨衣先女上,很紧。再让老师背过去女上,双手背后撑床,我撑着她细腰,每动一下都能感觉洞口的刮擦。再传统动作,看着老师的坚挺胸部,平坦小腹,老师夹紧下面,每动一下…

Channel
上海凤栖楼报告榜📋
@xflzy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003991091282 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xflzy |
| Description | 打造上海安全可信的修车平台(免费上榜) 总站入口:@XFL98 上海凤栖楼公告群🔔:http://t.me/xflgg 上海凤栖楼甄选榜🏆:http://t.me/xfltop 上榜管理员: http://t.me/xflgl 合作 咨询: http://t.me/xflgl 双向机器人: @XFL_kefubot |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 8 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xflzy |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 17 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 17 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 783.2%
- avg views ÷ 17 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 133
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 June 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,864 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 22
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
【温馨提示】:作业反馈仅供参考 注:提交作业反馈需要约课记录 【验证留名】:🐉 少爷 【验证老师】:水灵儿 @Shuiliner 【验证地址】:闵行 【验证时间】:8/8 【修车水费】:19pp 【服务内容】:课表一致 【颜值身材】:9 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:优点颜值高,服务态度很好,无明显缺点。 【推荐程度】:强烈 【过程描述】:进门人照一致,去掉磨皮就是本人,老师也是很热情拉着我的手到沙发上坐下,拿出冷藏矿泉水给我解渴,交了水费,提出yyy,也是可以,老师冷白皮,胸C,肚有肉不是排骨却很紧致,感觉桩起来更舒服,洗的特别仔细,还有szx,差点给我交代了,口活太棒了,洗完细心给你檫干,来到床上也是大蟒蛇,要了69,发现老师特别敏感,亲着亲着,老师下面都已经淫水泛滥,喊ls拿出☔戴上,后入起手,屌感无敌,水超级多,真是人如其名呀,在九九八十一次的冲击下,完美出货,老师也是说非常满意。 总结 老师水多,不事逼车机,提出的…
【温馨提示】:作业反馈仅供参考 注:提交作业反馈需要约课记录 【验证留名】:cjw 【验证老师】:柰倩 @lzwhqian 【验证地址】:闵行 【验证时间】:8月3日 【修车水费】:P 【服务内容】:yyy sw 【颜值身材】:8分 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:嫩吧,是有点也是缺点 【推荐程度】:较好 【过程描述】:约了工兵p,ls身高挺高的170左右,皮肤略黄胸b,感觉这行没做多久,两个人洗好澡各自躺床上,我也醉了,然后我开始给ls做服务😂,doi可以,ls是我最近cj过的嫩妹中最紧的一个,123不对没3秒了。没有活动应该不会二刷
【温馨提示】:作业反馈仅供参考 注:提交作业反馈需要约课记录 标准作业模板如下 【验证留名】:tl 【验证老师】:浦东雨雨 【验证地址】:浦东区 【验证时间】:8月2日 【修车水费】:1900PP 【服务内容】:有 【颜值身材】:9分 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:嫩,紧,听话 【推荐程度】:嫩妹值得推荐 【过程描述】:淡淡的素妆很是好看,人也不矮,身材可以,见面后穿着火辣的着装,立马就有反应了,已经硬的不行了,光溜溜的身子。然后在服务这一块很是到位细致不含糊,始服 务,老师先吻遍了全身每一寸肌肤,然后红红的嘴唇亲吻我的小弟弟。嘿嘿嘿,中间补脑吧。到了关键一步,将龟头插入老师的小穴穴里面,那感觉简直不要太爽了,太紧了,欲求不满的感觉。让我深深的迷恋,九浅一深的活塞让老师声音来回在耳边传递。不死鱼不机车,满满的到位
【温馨提示】:作业反馈仅供参考 注:提交作业反馈需要约课记录 【验证留名】:x 【验证老师】:乐乐 【验证地址】:浦东 【验证时间】:7月31日 【修车水费】:P 【服务内容】:有 【颜值身材】:10分 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:嫩 【推荐程度】:强烈 【过程描述】:位置很好找,停车也方便。也是非常的满意,态度也很热情,声音很甜。直接就交了课费,口活很丝滑,很紧,69口都有,下面很干净,无异味,配合得很好。各种姿势,无缝衔接(自行脑补)每次叫床的声音都来的正是时候,快射的时候她的下面在一阵阵的夹你,感觉一起来的高潮!意犹未尽,强力推荐
【温馨提示】:作业反馈仅供参考 注:提交作业反馈需要约课记录 标准作业模板如下 【验证留名】:欢喜哥 【验证老师】:浦东🍓金桥小怡08年(可外可夜) 【验证地址】:上海浦东 【验证时间】:7月29日 【修车水费】:1000P 【服务内容】:有 【颜值身材】:10分 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:无 【推荐程度】:强烈 【过程描述】:怡老师给我的第一印象就是年轻 漂亮 身材好 颜值好 穿着的小短裙很诱人 怡老师皮肤很白 脱衣很惊艳 圆润饱满的小白兔在眼前蹦出来 性欲感🈵🈵 老师口活很好 小嘴巴舌吻很舒服 吃得小弟弟硬邦邦 口活爽到不行 小穴水很多 润滑润滑的 而且非常紧 叫声销魂 就好比邻家小妹妹变小浪姐 十分满意👍🏻 值得二刷
【温馨提示】:作业反馈仅供参考 注:提交作业反馈需要约课记录 标准作业模板如下 【验证留名】:张先生 【验证老师】:@anyimo522 【验证地址】:黄浦 【验证时间】:7月28 【修车水费】:500/p 【服务内容】:课表上都有 【颜值身材】:9.6 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:态度好推荐 【推荐程度】:强烈 【过程描述】:科室交通便利很好找遥控上楼 老师声音甜甜的长发皮肤白皙,整个服务过程都很主动热情 课表内容都有 口活一流 全程都很享受 事后也不催 还给按摩放松就服务而言 性价比无敌 强烈推荐👍
【温馨提示】:作业反馈仅供参考 注:提交作业反馈需要约课记录 标准报告模板如下 【验证留名】:jan 【验证老师】:温迪咖啡 【验证地址】:徐汇 【验证时间】:7月26日 【修车水费】:P 【服务内容】:有 【颜值身材】:9分 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:性感热情 【推荐程度】:强烈推荐 【过程描述】:闲来没事上来群里瞅了几眼。刚好看见温迪妹妹在,尝试问了一下妹子空么,没想到约上了。遥控上楼后,妹子一身淑女装,短发,相貌甜美,画了淡妆很相宜。妹妹特别主动聊天,不会觉得尴尬,反而作为老司机的我有点害羞,洗漱完毕后,开始服务,从上慢慢到下,再把小弟弟含入口中吮吸。不知怎么的,遇到妹妹后后龟头变得特别特别特别的敏感。然后让妹妹反过来口,69式可以看到妹妹的花蕾,不一会儿就硬到了极致,带上小雨伞,换了几个姿势后就让我到达了云端,值得各位狼友cj 漂亮有激情,整个过程结束,让人觉得如沐春风。
【温馨提示】:作业反馈仅供参考 注:提交作业反馈需要约课记录 标准作业模板如下 【验证留名】:zfd 【验证老师】:@TTianxxin2008 【验证地址】:浦东 【验证时间】:7月24日 【修车水费】:6P(工兵) 【服务内容】:yyy,sw,三点口 【颜值身材】:9 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:颜值高,热情 【推荐程度】:较好 【过程描述】:位置在陆家嘴附近,核心地段,一个大楼里,是个改造的一排公寓,一排长长的走廊,到门口发现房间对着过道的窗户还开了一条五厘米的缝,能亲眼看到老师穿着工作服来开门,只能说有点刺激,不过说明老师安全意识不太高的样子,果然是不太懂的嫩妹。 进门,老师比照片好看很多,的确和之前ly的评价一样,班花级别,这个脸就值了。不过皮肤不如照片白,而且稍微有点痘痘,汗毛也偏多,不过还算正常。聊了两句,刚开始一分钟老师不太说话,结果一分钟后,变成了话痨模式,电影里青楼门口招揽客人的老妈子的状态:哥哥~你热…
【温馨提示】:作业反馈仅供参考 注:提交作业反馈需要约课记录 【验证留名】:瑞昌(haif) 【验证老师】:甜馨 @TTianxxin2008 【验证地址】:上海浦东 【验证时间】:7月25日 【修车水费】:1000pp 【服务内容】:有 【颜值身材】:9 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:嫩妹,亲和力好。 【推荐程度】:较好 【过程描述】:老师河南人,亲和力非常好,和人聊的非常好,不机车不催时间,下面开发不算多,无味干净,进去之后嫩妹的优势就是紧紧的,🐍吻配合度高,身材属于苗条又不排骨精,无纹身,do起来蛮耐受的,整体体验非常不错,市中心位置,没多久老实结束。
【温馨提示】:作业反馈仅供参考 注:提交作业反馈需要约课记录 【验证留名】:大力金刚果 【验证老师】:小美 @xiaomeiqt118 【验证地址】:普陀 【验证时间】:7月23日 【修车水费】:P600 【服务内容】:全套,舌吻,六九,毒龙,陪浴帮洗 【颜值身材】:9分 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:无 【推荐程度】:较好 【过程描述】:小美老师整体体验下来还是非常不错的,工作室好找,楼下停车场就可以停车很方便。遥控上楼,空调提前开好的屋里很凉快,这点值得表扬。进门见到老师穿着性感的情趣制服,奶子若隐若现,以及下面黑森林展露出来,看的我的老二直接硬起来。褪去衣物洗澡都是老师帮我完成的,甚至老师还帮我擦脚上的水。很不错!特别是老师在口的时候,那个眼神简直像蜘蛛精要吃了我一样,风骚至极!!很舒服!!啪啪结束后,了解到老师还会按摩,果断加了个钟按摩。很舒服的一次体验!
【温馨提示】:作业反馈仅供参考 注:提交作业反馈需要约课记录 【验证留名】:yoyo 【验证老师】:温迪 【验证地址】:徐汇 【验证时间】:7月22日 【修车水费】:600 【服务内容】:课本上都有 【颜值身材】:性感 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:口活一流 【推荐程度】:极力推荐 【过程描述】:朋友推荐来的,见面就极度缠绵,差点在浴室就大战起来,一双美腿玉足加持,来到床上,Jo舔遍我的半身,还有蛋蛋和鸡鸡。等到一触即发之时,我让她坐在那根硬邦邦的棍子上面,看她一边浪喘一边摇动。若干时刻,我也不甘示弱,翻身做了主人,让她在我的胯下有节奏地抖动起来。最后换了几个姿势,在她上下两个口同时夹击之下缴械。
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xflzy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 78,741 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“上海凤栖楼报告榜📋” (@xflzy), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xflzy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.