Channel
@xcdd_hs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,435subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001319111332 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xcdd_hs |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xcdd_hs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 8,435 | +7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 8,428 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3 (5 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,086 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 23:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
店名:陆家嘴高颜值旗舰店 坐标：浦东陆家嘴 价格：#599元 类型：#推油 营业时间12：00－02:30 高端SPA 不一样的享受 全场00后颜值体系 (私聊每天更新出勤) 全体服务人员最低净身高1.65以上高的1.7--1.73身高 身材凹凸有致 服务时间60分 照片预约不满意 您说了算 随便换 停车方便，更多乐趣，尽在商城，请予以客服沟通，这边尽量满足 水费：599 「累积优惠详情咨询客服」 地址：商城商务楼附近 ⭐️［其他更多店铺联系⬇️］ 💗米兰电话：15121028359 💗微信：milan2023spa 💗QQ：1770954401 💗客服：@shptspa 💗总群：@mlshhxspa 💗频道：@mlshspa
❤1
#推油 #徐汇 #四推 百花楼 #上海 #徐汇 #四推 #全裸 #主打泡泡浴 上海徐汇区第一高质量 4T门店 👍本店主打颜值 颜值 颜值👍 每天出勤15＋ 环境优雅，颜值巅峰服务天花版 致力打造SPA届的巅峰、理想天堂圣地 🔥原价498🔥 🔥活动价😍😍😍 🔥三人行😍😍😍 🔥🔥🔥泡泡浴😍😍😍 开业特价活动:双飞一🐉二鳯同进同出 50-60分钟不限制 射了妹子继续服务 店铺服务： 胸推 臀推 漫游 过水吸皮 制服诱惑 丝袜诱惑 情趣诱惑 高跟鞋诱惑 角色扮演 cos 调情 颜射 毒龙 抓龙筋 指滑 舌滑 足交 乳交 按摩 陪聊天 限时不限次 按摩 射身 店铺 4t 莞式 双飞 欲贯满盈＋性感胸滑＋嫦娥之吻＋波涛汹涌＋蚂蚁上树＋毒龙+调情＋指划＋猴子偷桃＋高山流水＋漫游＋双宝夹龙+制服诱惑＋丝袜诱惑+大🦵推+臀推+胸推+足推+腿夹=6T 可摸可揉可亲，还可以射到妹子😀😀😀身上 无套路、不办卡、没有任何隐形消费！…
❤2
🔞【上海鑫鑫——抓龙筋精选】🔞 专为哥哥们寻找上海本土优质抓龙筋老师，收录真实用户体验反馈，帮助哥哥们少走弯路，避免踩坑。 🤗上海区域广泛覆盖： 目前已覆盖：📍浦东新区｜静安｜普陀｜长宁｜杨浦｜徐汇｜闵行｜松江｜更多区域持续开发中…… 价格：价格：599起 ~~1099 鑫鑫专属频道：@shanghaixxjx 预约客服：@xinxinjingxuan 双向机器人：@xinxinjingxuan_bot 查看>>上海全区鑫鑫——抓龙筋精选>>更多介绍 上海修车大队会所榜 https://t.me/xcdd_hs
❤1
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @xcdd_hs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 243,938 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“上海修车大队会所榜” (@xcdd_hs), 8,435 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xcdd_hs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.