❤️🩹
custom 53665408959549361913custom 53753836967464995703

Channel
@xafsa_7s
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
85subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002085365119 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xafsa_7s |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xafsa_7s |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 85 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:59 | 85 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
97 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5375383696746499570 | 41 | 42.3% | |
| custom 5366540895954936191 | 22 | 22.7% | |
| custom 5204350655841455663 | 13 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5210834793738041220 | 7 | 7.22% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 6.19% | |
| custom 5269592617816968483 | 3 | 3.09% | |
| custom 5269431247305724003 | 2 | 2.06% | |
| custom 5269528094523282829 | 2 | 2.06% | |
| custom 5357125322619773599 | 1 | 1.03% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2025 to 27 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❤️🩹
custom 53665408959549361913custom 53753836967464995703
❤️
custom 53753836967464995705custom 53665408959549361913
❤️
custom 53753836967464995704custom 53665408959549361913
🖤
custom 53753836967464995703
...
custom 53665408959549361912custom 53753836967464995702💔1
🤍
custom 53753836967464995703custom 52043506558414556631custom 52694312473057240031custom 52695280945232828291
Как сказал Шохрух: хамон севаман ростан бе хазл ишон ростан
custom 52043506558414556631custom 52108347937380412201custom 52695926178169684831custom 53753836967464995701
севги нима узи..?
💔1custom 52043506558414556631custom 52108347937380412201custom 53753836967464995701
Video, posted without a caption
custom 52043506558414556632💔1custom 53753836967464995701
Video, posted without a caption
custom 52108347937380412202custom 53665408959549361911custom 53753836967464995701
🥹🤍
custom 53753836967464995702custom 52043506558414556631custom 52108347937380412201custom 53665408959549361911
A ❤️🩹
custom 53753836967464995703💔1custom 52043506558414556631custom 52695280945232828291custom 52695926178169684831
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @xafsa_7s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“xafsa7_s” (@xafsa_7s), 85 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xafsa_7s.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.