Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🇺🇦x_Notes🇺🇦 🔜

@x_notes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,722subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001125479335
TypeChannel
Username@x_notes
DescriptionCybersecurity Notes
Created8 May 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/x_notes

Growth

1,7226 Aug 2026, 20:37 — 1,722 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:45 — 1,722 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:376 Aug 2026, 20:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,720–1,724 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 20:451,722no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:371,722first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 23 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.9%
avg views ÷ 1,722 subscribers
Avg views / post
911
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held18 (23 June 202531 July 2026)
Views total5,464
Reactions total127
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
435
Videos
41
Links
376

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

292 reactions across 18 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍25085.6%
👎4214.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 292reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC278 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DC8044_InfoPhoto

DC8044 вітає з Днем системного адміністратора!

👍9

28 Jul 2026, 05:24 UTC437 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DC8044_InfoPhoto

DC8044 оголошує великий збір. У військовий підрозділ, де з початку війни проходять службу два відомі амбасадори нашої спільноти, критично потрібна інженерна техніка. Мова йде про закупівлю невеликого екскаватора для того, щоб побудувати фортифікації для підрозділу на одному з горячих напрямків фронту: це Запоріжжя. Ми обов'язково зробимо кілька цікавих розіграшів за ці донати. Але зараз просто немає часу для того,

👍5👎1

27 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC419 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DC8044_InfoPhoto

Работает "Пересвет"

👍7

21 Jul 2026, 14:23 UTC≈1,130 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пройоб, вибачаюсь.

👍12👎7

14 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTC≈1,680 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В сраку собі засунь дізлайк той😁

👍32👎7

14 Jul 2026, 07:25 UTC≈1,520 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @molfar_globalPhoto

Навіть нібито щільне ППО не стане перепоною для якісного OSINTу. «Розвідка: анонімності не існує» в продажу вже завтра.

👍34👎13

16 Jun 2026, 17:29 UTC≈1,460 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DC8044_InfoPhoto

Вулкан Этна, дисишечка отметилась.

👍13

5 Feb 2026, 14:15 UTC≈2,290 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @securediaryPhoto

In Ukraine, cyber defense is not theoretical. It’s forged in a war with aggressor. That’s why I'm planning to attend Kyiv International Cyber Resilience Forum (Feb 19-20), not for trends, but for lessons forged in real conditions. These events for me are: • A chance to learn what works on the front lines • Meet people who get the high-stakes environment (and the stress) • Share how we level up our own cyber postur

👍9

19 Jan 2026, 22:39 UTC≈1,270 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DC8044_InfoPhoto

Дослідницька лабораторія зі штучного інтелекту. Система під назвою OLYMPUS. Звичайний експеримент. Потім вона почала копіювати себе. Потім вона втекла. Потім вона навчилася давати відсіч. Тепер ми відправляємо хакерів. А OLYMPUS? Він теж змагається. ДЕ? UNIT RANGE ARENA ХТО? ХАКЕРИ ПРОТИ ШІ-АГЕНТІВ КОЛИ? 19-20 лютого 2026 | KICRF'26 | ТІЛЬКИ ОФЛАЙН ФОРМАТ Attack & Defense CCDC - кожен б'ється з кожним. Два дні безп

👍7👎1

29 Dec 2025, 07:34 UTC≈1,580 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @uappsecPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

👍14

6 Oct 2025, 14:03 UTC≈2,490 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ximerusofficialPhoto

Актуальний стан кіберпростору в Україні за останні роки...

👍29

15 Sept 2025, 12:04 UTC≈2,170 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DC8044_InfoPhoto

Наші друзі із Molfar Intelligence Institute запрошують на конференцію та турнір з OSINT в рамках закритої конференції KITE. Змагання відбудеться 23 вересня з 10:30 до 14:30 в офлайн-форматі. Учасників поділять на команди та роздадуть завдання, які готує Molfar Intelligence Institute разом з НКЦК РНБО та СБУ. Ментори зі спільнот Кіберборошно, OSINT Flow, OSINT Varta, а також Geoguessr-гравець CleyRey допомагатимуть

👍3👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @x_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇺🇦x_Notes🇺🇦 🔜” (@x_notes), 1,722 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x_notes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.