Instagram unbans are up send cases
Signed Virtual

Channel
@x78works
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
111subscribers
-688 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003850987510 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @x78works |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 3 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/x78works |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 09:17 | 111 | -8 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 119 | -380 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 499 | -50 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 549 | -46 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 595 | -44 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 639 | -61 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 700 | -82 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 782 | -17 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 799 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:29 | 799 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Instagram unbans are up send cases
Signed Virtual
rep in send cases @notimmersion
Signed Virtual
💎 Virtual Media 🛄 Since 2018, Virtual Media has been trusted by creators, brands, and businesses. ✅ Our process is built on integrity, experience, and proven results. ➡️ Contact us today to get started!
Signed Virtual
Send cases 299$ instant unban
Signed note (instant unbans)
Doing IG unbans, $100 firm can only do intergrity and fraud tat is almost instant. Contact @notimmersion
Signed note (instant unbans)
50+ cases done within past 1 day ✈️@notimmersion
Signed note (instant unbans)
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed note (instant unbans)
Rep is in Keep Sending Cases
Signed note (instant unbans)
Meta representative in office send your cases
Signed note instant unbans
$550 flat any reason
Signed note instant unbans
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed note instant unbans
rep logged in send cases
Signed note instant unbans
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @x78works. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@x78works named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Virtual Media” (@x78works), 111 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x78works.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.