Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for X402 Hyper Layer

Channel

X402 Hyper Layer

@x402hyperlayer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

65subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002907163767
TypeChannel
Username@x402hyperlayer
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/x402hyperlayer

Growth

656665.57 August 2026 — 66 subscribers10 August 2026 — 66 subscribers14 August 2026 — 65 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65–66 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:4665-1
10 Aug 2026, 02:0166no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:4766first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 03s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
853.3%
🔥426.7%
👍213.3%
🎉16.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Apr 2026, 14:15 UTC48 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Hi everyone, how interested are you guys in moving to the Ethereum network?

  1. interested33%
  2. no67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Nov 2025, 22:02 UTC182 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/X402Hyperlayer/status/1995251991900307805

29 Nov 2025, 14:14 UTC191 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

https://x.com/X402Hyperlayer/status/1994771377237496069

24 Nov 2025, 09:04 UTC260 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Has anyone tried this utility yet? 👀 Our new modules - Private USDC Payments (Alpha) and the Encrypted Global Lounge - are now live and ready to use. 👉 hyperlayer.online We’d love to hear your experience. Feel free to share any feedback or issues you encounter.

1

24 Nov 2025, 07:40 UTC229 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

📢 HyperLayer Update 1.4 - Release Notes Live We’ve just shipped Update 1.4, bringing major improvements across privacy payments, encrypted messaging, and client-side cryptography. What’s New 🔹 Private USDC Payments (Alpha) First iteration of private, client-side–signed USDC transfers powered by our lightweight zk-STARK stack. 🔹 Encrypted Global Lounge Upgrade Faster message handling, reduced overhead, and improve

23 Nov 2025, 21:58 UTC177 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

X402 Hyper Layer is now listed on Web3Privacy Explorer. Bringing next-gen privacy, encrypted data flow, and zk-powered execution to Web3. 🔗 https://explorer.web3privacy.info/project/x402-hyper-layer- More updates coming soon.

👍1

22 Nov 2025, 23:16 UTC177 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

HyperLayer - Solana Developer Grant Submission Update We’ve officially submitted our Developer Tooling proposal to the Solana Foundation this week. Our submission focuses on: • Private AI agent payments using the X402 settlement engine • Client-side zk-STARK based identity & message verification • Encrypted cross-chain messaging modules • A lightweight SDK for AI agents to sign, validate & execute payments privatel

3

22 Nov 2025, 01:08 UTC159 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/X402Hyperlayer/status/1992035218417746292

21 Nov 2025, 16:38 UTC174 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

HyperLayer Our Full zk-STARK Protocol Stack Is Now Live Today we’re excited to reveal the end-to-end architecture powering HyperLayer: a unified stack for Private Identity, Private Messaging, and Private Payments all secured by client-side zk-STARK proofs. This is the system that allows HyperLayer to run: • wallet creation without servers • global E2E encrypted messaging • private USDC transfers • public verifiabl

3

21 Nov 2025, 10:10 UTC124 viewsread 10 August 2026

Repo is currently being prepared cleaning up the codebase, structuring the cryptography modules, and adding proper documentation so it fits well within the zk-STARK ecosystem. The goal is to publish it as a lightweight privacy stack starter: client-side identity, STARK-inspired keygen, encrypted messaging, and local signing flows. Will share the repo soon once everything is polished.

21 Nov 2025, 10:00 UTC146 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Quoting @EliBenSasson - “it’s szn time to ship real zk stuff” here’s my small contribution to that spirit. Just shipped the first working build of HyperLayer, a minimal privacy dApp inspired by the principles behind zk-STARKs: • client-side zk-style identity generation • STARK-like “no trusted setup” approach to key material • auto wallet derivation • real-time global lounge with full E2EE • USDC send with local si

1

21 Nov 2025, 00:20 UTC115 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Just got a DM from Endrit (Starknet Ecosystem Reviewer) regarding our submission to the Starknet Ecosystem directory. Yes we’re officially on their radar. 👀 Our Starknet integration module is in progress, and the team requested more details about our current development. Which means: ✨ They’re reviewing us seriously ✨ The project is considered “worth checking” ✨ A potential listing is getting closer Step by step, w

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @x402hyperlayer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Apr 2026, 14:15 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

Hi everyone, how interested are you guys in moving to the Ethereum network?

  1. interested33%
  2. no67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 1 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,060,025 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“X402 Hyper Layer” (@x402hyperlayer), 65 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x402hyperlayer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.