8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,190–4,223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 06:04
4,195
+1
24 Aug 2026, 16:16
4,194
-13
21 Aug 2026, 02:47
4,207
-2
17 Aug 2026, 23:41
4,209
-3
14 Aug 2026, 17:08
4,212
-6
11 Aug 2026, 10:08
4,218
-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:31
4,219
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:23
4,219
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.52%
avg views ÷ 4,195 subscribers
Avg views / post
232
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
20 (29 July 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
3,939
Reactions total
55
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
62 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
17
27.4%
🥰
15
24.2%
💯
8
12.9%
🫡
7
11.3%
🏆
4
6.45%
👍
4
6.45%
🆒
3
4.84%
🤩
2
3.23%
😁
1
1.61%
😘
1
1.61%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📊 I’ve built a Crypto Dashboard Screener that ranks every coin’s bullish/bearish strength across multiple timeframes, scoring each one out of 10 based on my framework.
Why it matters? 🔍
In a bullish market, finding the strongest assets is key. This tool cuts through the noise—no more manual chart scanning, just quick, clear opportunities.
The question is: should I share it with you? 👀
If this post hits 500+ reactio…
🔥 ETHFI long setup — quick play with tight risk
📈 Entry: CMP or 3612
🎯 Target: 4542
🛡️ Stop: 3446
Setup looks solid, but sizing is smaller than usual — NFP news day adds volatility. Keep it lean.
⚠️ Risk only what you can afford. Trade safe.
— X268 Signal 🎯
📊 BTC Market Update
The chart stays clean and simple.
🔴 Red zone = my key accumulation area.
🟢 Green zone = profit-taking region, not a short setup.
If the POC (red line) keeps holding at current levels, price likely has room to push toward the VAH.
The market is also forming a b-Pattern. A clean breakout from the overbought zone could trigger a strong expansion move.
— X268 Signal 🎯
🚀 $UNI update — delivered as promised within 24h ✅
📈 Price is up 7% unleveraged, while most alts are still flat or bleeding.
⚡ Stop moved to breakeven — trade is now fully protected.
Funny how it works: when a trade hits SL, everyone’s asking. When TPs keep stacking, it’s crickets. 😅
— X268 Signal 🎯
🚀 UNI Update — Momentum Building
📈 Price climbed 4.5% from entry, with 1RR locked in ✅
💰 Partial profits booked — remaining position is now risk-free 🛡️
🔥 The move is just warming up — eyes on the next leg ahead 🔍
— X268 Signal 🎯
🎯 ZEC Update — 1.3RR secured ✅
Price climbed 6.5% from entry. Partial profits booked, rest moved to risk-free 🛡️
Watching for more upside 🔍
— X268 Signal 🎯
📉 BTC Scalp Short — Rejection Confirmed
Entry: CMP
🎯 Target: 62500
🛡️ SL: 64250 (tight)
Price hit our short zone, rejected, and is forming a P-pattern — small risk, clean setup.
⚠️ Manage risk, stick to the plan.
— X268 Signal 🎯
📉 $BTC Update
The short zone played out exactly as mapped — clean rejection from resistance. ✅
I missed the entry myself due to timezone overlap, but props to everyone who caught the move. 🎯
Fresh market plans dropping soon. 🔍
— X268 Signal 🎯
$ZEC update — holding up nicely ✅
📈 Price is up 3.5% so far — solid start, no complaints
🛡️ Keeping the same plan, just tightening risk — SL moved just above 457
Stay locked in, and drop a reaction if you're riding this with us 🙌
— X268 Signal 🎯
📊 BTC — LTF Watch
Grateful for all the votes — much appreciated ❤️
🔍 Watching the 63600–64000 zone for a possible short setup.
⏳ No limit orders — waiting for confirmation before acting.
🔥 Bonus: hit 100+ reactions in the first hour and I’ll drop a full August Market Outlook video.
⚠️ Educational content only — not financial advice. Trade at your own risk.
— X268 Signal 🎯
❤4💯4🤩1😘1🆒1
Signed Heart | X268 💎
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @x268Signal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Binance Trading Crypto Futures Signals @Crypto_Signals_Trading_Binance · 75,196 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 19 August 2026
Rose Challenge - 0.1BTC to 100BTC🌹 @CryptoRoseChannell · 103,205 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Kahramanov | Crypto 📈 @kahramanov_trader · 58,569 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Binance Crypto Signal - X268” (@x268Signal), 4,195 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x268Signal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
