Channel
@x1693
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,188subscribers
-154 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003727352199 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @x1693 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 12 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/x1693 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 2,188 | -133 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 2,321 | -21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 2,342 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 12 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (12 March 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
24 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 83.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌 其他 📢 精选福利社 📢 菲律宾大事件 菲律宾日记 📢 缅甸新闻 泰国大事件 越南大事件 📢 金三角大事件 特区实时资讯 📢 西港事件 西港曝光 西港大事件 西港日记 西港新闻 📢 斯里兰卡大事件 东南亚动态 东南亚早报 东南亚新鲜事 📢 内涵段子🔥搞笑视频 📢 吃瓜 猎奇 热门 搞笑 📢 娱乐头条（吃瓜段子） 📢 内涵段子TV 📢 搞笑视频 内涵段子 吃瓜视频 📢 东南亚热点|新闻|曝光 📢 国产热门擦边短剧 📢 海外素材库/人设 套图 📢 欧美AV无码女优 📢 人间文案馆 📢 擦边短剧精选热播 📢 日本AV 中文字幕 精品女优合集 📢 日本AV|高清无码 📢 日本AV 中文字幕 精品女优合集 📢 每日精选AV（黑丝 自慰 露出 巨乳 ） 📢 中文字幕 | 日本AV 📢 日本无码AV/在线/最新 📢 日本无码破解av少妇人妻 📢 无码AV精选 📢 热门电影速看/高分电影推荐 📢 每日素材精选 📢 热门BGM｜抖音神曲 📢 …
🔍同城交友 📢 767资源导航|精品资源 🧩兴趣社区 📢 网红极品无码推特 📢 伪娘TS人妖男同 📢 足交黑丝白丝母狗玉足 📢 大屌人妖女王伪娘高潮 📢 欧美黑人无码AV 📢 伪娘男奴潮喷 📢 热点曝光台 📢 i8国际娱乐平台（⚽️2026世界杯专属平台） 📢 体育|电竞|足球|NBA【每日推荐】 🍉新闻吃瓜 📢 搞笑视频 内涵段子 吃瓜视频 📢 亚太曝光 亚太大事件 金边大事件 国家大事件 📢 东南亚吃瓜搞笑 📢 木牌大事件 戈公日记 西港新闻 📢 迪拜新闻|东南亚大事件|曝光群 📢 全网热搜社 📢 东南亚吃瓜 @cg258 📢 东南亚吃瓜新闻|新闻快讯 📢 新闻情报局 📢 吃瓜群众丨抖音热搜 📢 国际新闻|吃瓜新闻|突发事件 📢 全球新闻|曝光|吃瓜|突发事情 📢 东南亚大事件 | 吃瓜新闻 📢 东南亚大事件 | CG快报 🎬影视资源 📢 口爆反差极品 📢 群P巨乳妹迷奸 📢 母狗|反差|福利 📢 网红资源之家 📢 网…
📌 其他 📢 精选福利社 📢 菲律宾大事件 菲律宾日记 📢 缅甸新闻 泰国大事件 越南大事件 📢 金三角大事件 特区实时资讯 📢 西港事件 西港曝光 西港大事件 西港日记 西港新闻 📢 斯里兰卡大事件 东南亚动态 东南亚早报 东南亚新鲜事 📢 内涵段子🔥搞笑视频 📢 吃瓜 猎奇 热门 搞笑 📢 娱乐头条（吃瓜段子） 📢 内涵段子TV 📢 搞笑视频 内涵段子 吃瓜视频 📢 东南亚热点|新闻|曝光 📢 国产热门擦边短剧 📢 海外素材库/人设 套图 📢 欧美AV无码女优 📢 人间文案馆 📢 擦边短剧精选热播 📢 日本AV 中文字幕 精品女优合集 📢 日本AV|高清无码 📢 日本AV 中文字幕 精品女优合集 📢 每日精选AV（黑丝 自慰 露出 巨乳 ） 📢 中文字幕 | 日本AV 📢 日本无码AV/在线/最新 📢 日本无码破解av少妇人妻 📢 无码AV精选 📢 热门电影速看/高分电影推荐 📢 每日素材精选 📢 热门BGM｜抖音神曲 📢 …
🔍同城交友 📢 767资源导航|精品资源 🧩兴趣社区 📢 网红极品无码推特 📢 伪娘TS人妖男同 📢 足交黑丝白丝母狗玉足 📢 大屌人妖女王伪娘高潮 📢 欧美黑人无码AV 📢 伪娘男奴潮喷 📢 热点曝光台 📢 i8国际娱乐平台（⚽️2026世界杯专属平台） 📢 体育|电竞|足球|NBA【每日推荐】 🍉新闻吃瓜 📢 搞笑视频 内涵段子 吃瓜视频 📢 亚太曝光 亚太大事件 金边大事件 国家大事件 📢 东南亚吃瓜搞笑 📢 木牌大事件 戈公日记 西港新闻 📢 迪拜新闻|东南亚大事件|曝光群 📢 全网热搜社 📢 东南亚吃瓜 @cg258 📢 东南亚吃瓜新闻|新闻快讯 📢 新闻情报局 📢 吃瓜群众丨抖音热搜 📢 国际新闻|吃瓜新闻|突发事件 📢 全球新闻|曝光|吃瓜|突发事情 📢 东南亚大事件 | 吃瓜新闻 📢 东南亚大事件 | CG快报 🎬影视资源 📢 口爆反差极品 📢 群P巨乳妹迷奸 📢 母狗|反差|福利 📢 网红资源之家 📢 网…
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5😁1
点击下方添加全部贴纸包👇 https://t.me/addstickers/CGY2GqJxPFh
❤1
2026年3月15号起，中国公安部门成立了“拖手行动”。 也就是说，现在纸飞机上也有中国警方的人，藏在你们发现不了的地方，不会轻易让你们找到。 希望各位国内的朋友不要轻易发“欧意地址钱包”，因为欧意都是实名制的，现在快不安全了。尽量用冷钱包。 因为在3月23号当天，在山东、河南、河北、广西抓获共159名网络诈骗嫌疑人，全部来自“色盘”。 现在色盘不好做了。希望各位平安顺利。 PS：捞偏门的种类很多，怎么会有畜牲专门骗国内的小孩出国？你们说这种畜牲都是没爹妈的孩子吗？ 关注CG快报频道： @x5823 商务 投稿： @cgyinliu_com
❤7👍3
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 点击下方添加全部表情包👇 https://t.me/addemoji/CGYDVy9AqVD
❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
点击下方添加全部贴纸包👇 https://t.me/addstickers/CGYwCKAiU5M
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @x1693. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 135,822 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 52 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@x1693 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“可爱表情包|搞笑表情包|猫猫表情包” (@x1693), 2,188 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x1693.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.