Channel
@wywlhh123
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,891subscribers
-46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002085890682 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wywlhh123 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wywlhh123 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 1,891 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 1,897 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 1,904 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 1,915 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 1,921 | -11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 1,932 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 1,934 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 1,937 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 1,937 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 3 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
38 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 94.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
飞猪🐷<bao养>扬帆起航 点击进入bao养选择爱妃 👉👉👉👉👉👉 包养入会100U 入会下单 外围实时报名需30U定金 下单可以抵扣 👉👉👉👉👉👉👉 注⚠️【跑路包赔！售后到底 我们不对比某平台折扣 什么样的价格 带来什么样的服务】 飞猪🐷全网第一高端平台|学生妹|处女|良家等！先见面后付款/超严保密/ 见面不满意包退包换 专为老板打造专属私密圈📱 👉👉👉👉👉 @fz333 双向联系机器人 @fzsx123bot （需情绪价值/长期陪伴选bao养） ———————————————
开工中🌹预约联系 @fz333 发信息感叹号联系 @fzsx123bot
开工中🌹欢迎预约 @fz333 @fzsx123bot
http://www.xazzq123.shop/login 密码888 全国中圈 没有的城市私信我 🔥🔥🔥 总群https://t.me/feizhugkq
处女cn 感谢各位义父的支持☺️
❤1
满意就好😆
http://www.xazzq123.shop/login 密码888 全国中圈 没有的城市私信我
嘿嘿🌹年前了各位大哥冲冲冲鸭
好评➕
❤1
包yang 感谢信任🌹
❤1
中圈1️⃣ 加菲猫相册 https://jfm.zhiyuanche.com/ 密码999999 中圈2️⃣至尊相册 https://xc.zzun888.com/private/3979 密码123456 七十分钟两次 综合中⭕️各大城市 http://www.xazzq123.shop/login 密码888 高端相册1️⃣ https://02.oo00.shop 密码888888 ✅明星资源点击进入💎💎💎 ✅处nv资源点击进入🌹🌹🌹 飞猪🐷狼友交流群点击进入🌟 🔥🔥🔥🈴 既4.1号开始，飞🐷团队把价位让到最低，秉承着利薄多销原则，我们一直坚持高品质服务➕合理价格，感谢各位衣食父母 的支持❗️如有需要 预约联系 @fz333 信息发不过来联系 @fzsx123bot 🥰扫码浏览器打开，安排哪个截图给我就可以 全部自带豪华工作室，也可以上门， 明星🌟入会888安排名单，五位数起⁉️安排私信客服 ✈️中…
❤24👍1👎1
最近有好评款，中圈，需要的大哥可以预约啦🌹
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @wywlhh123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,396,309 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全国上海中大圈平价资源” (@wywlhh123), 1,891 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wywlhh123.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.