Posted without readable text

Channel
8K.com 8K国际官方频道
@www8k
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,689subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003795439461 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @www8k |
| Description | 欢迎来到 8K国际 娱乐平台 信誉至上 财富相伴 诚邀您与8K国际 创造无限可能 💓官方网址: 8K.com 💓官方客服: @vip8k 💓官方代理: @daili8k 💓双向限制: @Tel8kbot 💓飞机投注: @vip8k_bot 💞8K, 让钱生钱更有效率~ |
| First recorded | 6 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/www8k |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 19:22 | 4,689 | no change |
| 6 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 4,689 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 29 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.44%
- avg views ÷ 4,689 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 114
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 7.67%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (29 September 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,717 |
| Reactions total | 78 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 19:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 480
- Videos
- 16
- Links
- 256
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 58s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
78 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 18 | 23.1% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 20.5% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 16.7% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 12.8% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 8.97% | |
| custom 6064312114770615960 | 4 | 5.13% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 3.85% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.85% | |
| custom 6082260508222692831 | 2 | 2.56% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.28% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚗假期玩得尽兴, 💸钱包也跟着“🔸掉电”了? ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ➡️ 不如换个节奏,来 8K电子 轻松玩两局 ➡️ 热门游戏随时在线,想玩就开,不用等 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🔴电子救援金8888U 🔴电子惊喜注单88888U 🔴无限电子刷单18888U 🔴无限赔率奖18888U 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✈️ 官方飞投 @vip8k_bot Telegram 小程序一键畅玩 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8K.com 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8k.bet 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8k.co 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 @www8k➡️关注领VIP #8K国际 #8KAPP #秒速到账 #公平公正
🔥4❤2👍2👏2🎉1🥰1😁1
Posted without readable text
❤1👍1
📢 8K国际,不只是为了玩得开心,更重要的是每一步都要顺畅、稳定、安心 🫶 🤣😌🤣😄😁😁😊😄 🫠 单笔提款奖励 😢50万 ➜ 5888U 😢100万 ➜ 8888U 😢300万 ➜ 28888U 😢500万 ➜ 88888U 😀😀😀😀 审核高效,到账更省心 从登录到游戏,从充值到提款 😘😘 把复杂的流程变简单,把等待的时间尽量缩短 👏 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✈️ 官方飞投 @vip8k_bot Telegram 小程序一键畅玩 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8K.com 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8k.bet 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8k.co 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 @www8k➡️关注领VIP
❤2👍2🔥2👏1🥰1😁1😱1
Posted without readable text
👍2❤1
🥺🔠🔣电子 · 《丛林水果》 🍉🍍🍓🍇🍌轮番登场,这一局直接打出亮眼表现 🇽🇰 提款:😀😃😀😃😀😃😃📈 😀不只是画面,更重要的是流程顺畅、体验稳定。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀U存U提 · 安全便捷 😀热门游戏精选 · 提款极速到账 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✈️ 官方飞投 @vip8k_bot Telegram 小程序一键畅玩 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8K.com 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8k.bet 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8k.co 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 @www8k➡️关注领VIP #8K国际 #8KAPP #秒速到账 #公平公正
👍3❤2👏2🔥2🥰1😁1custom 60822605082226928311
Posted without readable text
🇨🇳 国庆假期,与其堵 🚗 在路上,不如在家轻松玩 🏠 🙂宅家开着空调,热门游戏随时开局 🫠 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😊😘🥹☺️😊😆😍😁☺️ 🥲😍☺️😊☺️😅🥰😀🥹多种玩法选择 😀 爆奖高光来了,精彩不停,提款操作简单,体验更顺畅。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✈️ 官方飞投 @vip8k_bot Telegram 小程序一键畅玩 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8K.com 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8k.bet 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8k.co 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 @www8k➡️关注领VIP #8K国际 #8KAPP #秒速到账 #公平公正
❤3🔥2🥰2👍1custom 60643121147706159601custom 60822605082226928311
Posted without readable text
8K.com 8K国际官方频道 pinned a photo
🧐 注册即可享体验金,新人上手更轻松✅ 🥺注册即可享 😀😀😀 体验金 🥺 关注频道可抽取Telegram会员 🌟 每日⭐️限定😀😀😀 名额⭐️ ⭐️关注官方频道 @WWW8K 获得名额 ⭐️ 🧐 联系TG客服@vip8k即可进行申请 🎁 ✈️ 官方飞投 @vip8k_bot Telegram 小程序一键畅玩 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8K.com 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8k.bet 🌈🌈🌈🌈💓 8k.co 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 @www8k➡️关注领VIP
👍3❤2🎉1👏1🥰1custom 60643121147706159601
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @www8k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“8K.com 8K国际官方频道” (@www8k), 4,689 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/www8k.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.