Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝙄𝙉𝙁𝙊 ꒰ 𝙏𝙉 ꒱

@wuxuaoch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

54subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003259580840
TypeChannel
Username@wuxuaoch
Descriptionдата создания: 27 октября
Created27 October 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/wuxuaoch

Growth

549 Aug 2026, 12:15 — 54 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:01 — 54 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 12:1510 Aug 2026, 09:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53–55 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 09:0154no change
9 Aug 2026, 12:1554first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 27 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53098558703377050671420.0%
custom 53097787499049379981318.6%
custom 5235801322665557705912.9%
custom 5310062853401633429811.4%
custom 5328155360186351626811.4%
custom 5190549014658974722710.0%
custom 5235514667958295648710.0%
custom 523569155189141636545.71%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2025 to 8 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Feb 2026, 12:01 UTC394 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 51905490146589747223custom 53281553601863516261

Signed 𝙑𝙚𝙧𝙁𝙖𝙡'

8 Feb 2026, 12:01 UTC373 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed 𝙑𝙚𝙧𝙁𝙖𝙡'

8 Feb 2026, 12:01 UTC401 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed 𝙑𝙚𝙧𝙁𝙖𝙡'

8 Feb 2026, 12:01 UTC403 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⬛️⬛️⬛️𝙏𝙤𝙠𝙪𝙗𝙚𝙩𝙨𝙪𝙣𝙖 𝙣𝙞𝙠𝙪⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️ ⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⬛️⬛️🔤толетиями ранее люди и догадаться не могли, как может упасть в одно мгновение целое устройство мира: ни населения, ни страны, а просто всего континента. Если раньше слагали легенды о каннибалах , что без зазрения совести пожирали себе подобного, то теперь каждый второй на улице питается телами своих сородичей. ⬛️⭐️⬛️⭐️⭐️⬛️🌟⬛️⭐️⭐️ — ⬛️🔤ы слышал о не

custom 53098558703377050675custom 52358013226655577054custom 53100628534016334294custom 53097787499049379983custom 53281553601863516263custom 51905490146589747222custom 52355146679582956481custom 52356915518914163651

Signed 𝙑𝙚𝙧𝙁𝙖𝙡'

8 Feb 2026, 12:01 UTC452 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🩸 ⭐️⬛️自分の種類を食べる ⭐️ 家族がいる ⭐️ 神を食べる ⭐️ 天使を食べる ⬛️⬛️🔤 вы помните, как была питательна говядина? Одного стейка, который застревает между зубов, было достаточно, чтобы наесться. Но сейчас.. Нужно больше. Необходимо съесть чуть ли не четыре больших куска. У человеческого мяса — самая низкая питательность. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⬛️⬛️🔤 вы часто едите мYc@? 🔤сновное.:⬛️⬛️ 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 Список персонажей

custom 53097787499049379984custom 53098558703377050674custom 52356915518914163652custom 53100628534016334292custom 51905490146589747221custom 52355146679582956481custom 52358013226655577051

Signed 𝙑𝙚𝙧𝙁𝙖𝙡'

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @wuxuaoch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 846,042 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙄𝙉𝙁𝙊 ꒰ 𝙏𝙉 ꒱” (@wuxuaoch), 54 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wuxuaoch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.