Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🔥谷歌推广 海外引流♨️启航网络🌐谷歌引流 海外推广 引流🔰谷歌竞价 谷歌代投 谷歌广告 谷歌开户 谷歌搜索引流推广推特推广 推特引流♨️FB推广 fb引流 谷歌排名 谷歌霸屏 谷歌竞价 推广谷歌 竞价引流 谷歌 海外推广

Channel

🔥谷歌推广 海外引流♨️启航网络🌐谷歌引流 海外推广 引流🔰谷歌竞价 谷歌代投 谷歌广告 谷歌开户 谷歌搜索引流推广推特推广 推特引流♨️FB推广 fb引流 谷歌排名 谷歌霸屏 谷歌竞价 推广谷歌 竞价引流 谷歌 海外推广

@wuhanqihang2

3 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

11,097subscribers

-70 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001936800102
TypeChannel
Usernames@wuhanqihang @wuhanqihang1 @wuhanqihang2
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 October 2026
Measurements held94
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/wuhanqihang2

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,37812,74911,563.511,0977 August 202631 October 2026
94 measurements spanning 85 days, net -70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,022–13,105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 94
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Oct 2026, 15:5011,097no change
31 Oct 2026, 12:5511,097-99
30 Oct 2026, 16:2111,196no change
30 Oct 2026, 13:0411,196-72
29 Oct 2026, 16:1911,268no change
29 Oct 2026, 14:0611,268-99
28 Oct 2026, 15:0911,367no change
28 Oct 2026, 14:4611,367-65
27 Oct 2026, 16:2111,432no change
27 Oct 2026, 15:1911,432-52
26 Oct 2026, 15:1811,484-1
26 Oct 2026, 13:0911,485-94
25 Oct 2026, 12:5011,579no change
25 Oct 2026, 12:1511,579-44
24 Oct 2026, 13:1011,623no change
24 Oct 2026, 13:0111,623-68
23 Oct 2026, 16:0411,691no change
23 Oct 2026, 15:0511,691-397
22 Oct 2026, 13:4112,088no change
22 Oct 2026, 12:4912,088first reading

Engagement

No public post preview. We read this entry on 22 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔥谷歌推广 海外引流♨️启航网络🌐谷歌引流 海外推广 引流🔰谷歌竞价 谷歌代投 谷歌广告 谷歌开户 谷歌搜索引流推广推特推广 推特引流♨️FB推广 fb引流 谷歌排名 谷歌霸屏 谷歌竞价 推广谷歌 竞价引流 谷歌 海外推广” (@wuhanqihang2), 11,097 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wuhanqihang2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.