Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Филипп Богачев про еду и вес

Channel

Филипп Богачев про еду и вес

@wtprofood

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

653subscribers

-40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003882639410
TypeChannel
Username@wtprofood
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 23 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/wtprofood

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6536936737 August 2026 — 693 subscribers8 August 2026 — 693 subscribers8 August 2026 — 692 subscribers14 August 2026 — 670 subscribers21 August 2026 — 672 subscribers4 September 2026 — 667 subscribers12 September 2026 — 664 subscribers25 September 2026 — 655 subscribers6 October 2026 — 653 subscribers7 August 20266 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 59 days, net -40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 647–699 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 03:58653-2
25 Sept 2026, 15:59655-9
12 Sept 2026, 13:57664-3
4 Sept 2026, 18:56667-5
21 Aug 2026, 01:56672+2
14 Aug 2026, 14:58670-22
8 Aug 2026, 06:01692-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:20693no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:49693first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

190 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12666.3%
😁2814.7%
⚡136.84%
💯136.84%
😍73.68%
🤔31.58%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wtprofood. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC160 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мои студенты знают лучше всех - худеть на шашлыках не только можно, но и нужно

💯11🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC185 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Марафон завтраков продолжается ;) курогрудь сувид в домашней аджике + ленивый салат

🔥10⚡2

1 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC294 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У меня только один вопрос: ЧТО ЭТО ЗА ХУЙНЯ???? Мне реально нужно ваше мнение

🔥3😁2🤔1

1 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC293 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😍6🔥4⚡2

1 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC262 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Завтрак «американский стандарт» - стейк и яйца. Стейк - пиканья в сувиде плюс гриль

🔥8⚡2

31 Jul 2026, 18:18 UTC233 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

"И взываем мы к Повелителю всего знания. Пролей свою силу на эту машину. Напитай это устройство своим священным зарядом" - Отрывок из "Литании призыва к двигателю" "Восславьте все приток и отток, Почуйте все воссияние нимба, Воспойте все электрику тела, Почуйте, как трещит полный заряд!" - Отрывок из песни электрической нагрузки "О, великое вместилище чести, Пусть сервомоторы твои будут ограждены от сбоев, Как тв…

🔥9😁3💯1

31 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC254 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Big Muzzy’s breakfast. Мой авторский завтрак ;) салат с домашним ростбифом (делал сам), песто, моцарелла, яйца, авокадо. p.s. почему биг Маззи, кто вспомнит? :)

🔥13😍1

30 Jul 2026, 11:37 UTC241 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уголок фудблогера ;) на вытяжке - два bt термометра, один щуп-термометр, мобильный свет. Все - магнитные ;) Кстати, если найдете свои температуры для еды, она станет куда вкуснее. Ибо запекать до готовности и запекать свинину до 72 градусов - суть разное. Помните, как познали температурный дзен?

🔥10⚡2

27 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC364 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Американский хлебушек для сендвичей. С ПРОТЕИНОМ. Проведите такой эксперимент с обычным хлебом, и скажите - есть ли разница :)

😁10🤔2

27 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC339 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кстати, хумус с огурцом вполне себе закуска для похрустеть. Углей мало, ГИ < 20, жира много, клетчатка есть. Единственный минус - звуковые эффекты на низких частотах, но это не всегда и не у всех :)

😁5

27 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC352 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Завтрак наутро после тренинга: половина краковской, 4 яйца, 100 хумуса.

🔥13

25 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC338 views16 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ультра мармелад! На сто грамм: ноль углей, ноль жира, 5 грамм белка. Филатова схомячила весь :)

🔥15⚡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @wtprofood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Филипп Богачев про еду и вес” (@wtprofood), 653 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wtprofood.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.