Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

WALL STREET PLUS

@wsproplus

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,667subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002573885061
TypeChannel
Username@wsproplus
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wsproplus

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

5,960 average views per post against 5,663 subscribers — an engagement rate of 105.3%. Across the 40,483 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 7.15% and 26.5%, with a median of 14.2%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured19 of 19 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled113,260
Mature posts only105.3% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers5,663 measured 10 August 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 40,483 channels · p10 3.46% · p25 7.15% · p50 14.2% · p75 26.5% · p90 43.8%
Position in cohort99.138th percentile · 7.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.052% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

5,6615,6675,6647 August 2026 — 5,661 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,661 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,663 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,667 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 5 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,660–5,668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:555,667+4
10 Aug 2026, 11:025,663+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:315,661no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:285,661first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
105.2%
avg views ÷ 5,667 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,960
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total113,260
Reactions total1,480
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,553 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍95661.6%
🔥30219.4%
875.60%
😭432.77%
😢392.51%
😁312.00%
😱201.29%
🤔171.09%
🕊140.901%
👏90.58%
🤯80.515%
🤝60.386%
🤣60.386%
🍾40.258%
🦄40.258%
💔30.193%
🍌20.129%
🐳10.064%
😴10.064%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,553reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC≈2,900 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸#SPCX #US SpaceX удвоила квартальную выручку, но осталась в минусе Во втором квартале выручка Space Exploration Technologies достигла $7,8 млрд против $4,1 млрд годом ранее. Рост оказался сильнее ожиданий рынка, а убыток — меньше прогнозов: $0,09 на акцию. Теперь внимание инвесторов смещается с финансового отчёта на способность компании поддерживать темпы развития. Ключевыми факторами станут расходы на исследован

👍468🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC≈3,260 views79 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸#OWL #US Сегодня на фоне хорошего отчета пробили важный уровень по Blue Owl. Страхи вокруг Private Credit начинают уходить. Дивиденды около 9% @wsproplus

👍658😁5🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC≈5,380 views104 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#MSFT #US Microsoft +15%. Наконец-то поняли ценность конторы @wsproplus

🔥64👍27😁7🍾4🕊2

30 Jul 2026, 06:54 UTC≈4,660 views87 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#QCOM #META #MSFT #SBUX Отчётность США: Microsoft ускоряется, Meta* наращивает выручку 💿 Qualcomm превзошла прогноз по выручке, но немного уступила по прибыли. EPS ожид. — $2,22 EPS факт. — $2,21 Выручка ожид. — $9,67 млрд Выручка факт. — $9,94 млрд Выручка оказалась на 3% выше ожиданий, однако год к году снизилась на 4%. EPS сократилась на 20%. 🔷 Meta* продолжила быстро расти, хотя прибыль не оправдала прогноз.

👍55🔥1913

29 Jul 2026, 19:58 UTC≈12,900 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸#macro #US ФРС сохранила ставку на уровне 3,5–3,75%. Решение принято большинством голосов, однако сразу три руководителя региональных банков выступили за повышение на 0,25 п.п. Столь заметного коллективного несогласия в ФРС не было с 2016 года. Причина — инфляция, которая уже пять лет превышает целевые 2%. Тарифы, подорожание энергии из-за конфликта с Ираном и масштабные инвестиции в инфраструктуру для ИИ поддерж

👍34🤔164🔥3

28 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC≈3,380 views97 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇮🇹#ISP #IT #EU Весной вас знакомил с интересным итальянским банком. Крупнейшим в Италии. Типа Сбера для РФ. Супер дивиденды и хороший рост показателей. Тогда акции стоили всего 5,2 евро. Сегодня уже 6,4 + выплатили полугодовой дивиденд! Мастерство смузи не пропьешь! @wsproplus

👍778🤝6😁6

28 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC≈3,310 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#ADBE В Adobe пошли мощные покупки Шикарную компанию еще вчера отдавали за сущие копейки. Промах Уолл-Стрит @wsproplus

👍42🔥16

28 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC≈3,540 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸#KO Народ перекидывает деньги в потребительский сегмент из IT. Это вам на хайповый ИИ. Но мы то уже набрали позиции)) @wsproplus

👍44😁41

27 Jul 2026, 14:07 UTC≈3,660 views138 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇨🇦#TD #CA Закрываю позицию по канадскому банку Toronto Dominion. За 1,5 года удалось удвоить вложения в него. Перекладываю часть денег в T и VZ @wsproplus

👍111🔥22👏2🕊2🐳1

25 Jul 2026, 18:36 UTC≈4,230 views168 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Подводим полугодовые итоги дивидендного портфеля США Заодно решил посмотреть результаты за последние четыре года инвестирования. Портфель уже преодолел отметку +100%. То есть за четыре года капитал удалось удвоить. Да, это не история про взрывной рост компаний из сферы искусственного интеллекта. Основа моего портфеля - качественные дивидендные компании, многие из которых покупались в периоды сильной просадки. Сре

👍118🔥3313👏4

24 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC≈4,420 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🇵🇼#FFKZ #RU Freedom Finance приостановил пополнение счетов через Цифра-банк Российские инвесторы, использовавшие Цифра-банк для перевода денег на счета во Freedom Bank Казахстан, столкнулись с ограничениями. После включения Цифра-банка в санкционный список Евросоюза пополнение казахстанских счетов через него стало временно недоступно. Freedom уже предупреждает об этом пользователей при входе в приложение, а Цифра-б

😭43👍16🕊5🦄42🍌2🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC≈3,900 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🛰#T #VZ Starlink напугал американских операторов связи Акции Verizon и AT&T заметно снизились после сообщений о том, что SpaceX обсуждала с Charter Communications запуск мобильной связи в США. Инвесторы опасаются, что Starlink может стать полноценным четвертым оператором. С 26 июня акции Verizon потеряли 8,5%, AT&T - 7,2%. T-Mobile чувствует себя лучше рынка, поскольку уже сотрудничает со SpaceX в области спутников

👍38😱65

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wsproplus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 280,694 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WALL STREET PLUS” (@wsproplus), 5,667 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wsproplus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.