Залили новый видос о TOPS vs SUBSCRIBE 😁 Все в тт смотреть 1⃣WS ORGANIZATION‼️

Channel
WS ORGANIZATION
@ws_organization
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
7,389subscribers
+221 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002277720369 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ws_organization |
| Description | DM - @WATCHMMME @slzzzm044 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ws_organization |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 21:21 | 7,389 | +311 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 07:06 | 7,078 | +53 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:09 | 7,025 | +18 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:36 | 7,007 | -9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 7,016 | -27 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 | 7,043 | -19 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 7,062 | -11 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 7,073 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 7,077 | -10 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 7,087 | -28 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 19:20 | 7,115 | +79 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 06:58 | 7,036 | -87 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 7,123 | +115 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 7,008 | +9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 6,999 | -53 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 7,052 | -6 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 7,058 | -48 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:35 | 7,106 | +48 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 7,058 | -23 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 7,081 | first reading |
Engagement
153 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.78%
- avg views ÷ 7,389 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 722
- 80 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 6.48%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 80
- of 153 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 42 of 80 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 153 (28 July 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 57,794 |
| Reactions total | 2,215 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 17:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 575
- Videos
- 14
- Links
- 780
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
4,839 reactions across 75 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 2,276 | 47.0% | |
| 🐳 | 1,179 | 24.4% | |
| ⚡ | 718 | 14.8% | |
| ❤ | 413 | 8.53% | |
| 👍 | 59 | 1.22% | |
| 🍓 | 36 | 0.744% | |
| ❤🔥 | 34 | 0.703% | |
| 🦄 | 22 | 0.455% | |
| 👻 | 17 | 0.351% | |
| 🤯 | 17 | 0.351% | |
| 🕊 | 11 | 0.227% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 0.186% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 0.165% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 0.124% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 0.124% | |
| 🍾 | 5 | 0.103% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 0.083% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.062% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.062% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 0.041% | |
| 8 further kinds | 11 | 0.227% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 153 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,839 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3,620
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 6
- of 153 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 1,800
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ws_organization. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 153 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 37 of 80 posts held from the last 30 days (46.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ПРОВЕРКА В TOP CIS 🍏ПРОВЕРКА PAD: PRICE: 120₽ | 50₴ | 100⭐️ Проверяющий - VINAMOR🇺🇦 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🍏ПРОВЕРКА MOBILE: PRICE: 120₽ | 50₴ | 100⭐️ Проверяющий - SAYWAY🇺🇦 🍏TOP IPHONE 🍏TOP IPAD Приобрести — @bxxxIxxl @deadline_organization
NEW FREE TDM TOURNAMENT? По реакциям поймем
❤35🔥2⚡1🍓1🐳1👻1🕊1🥰1
FULL✅
❤1
Турнир 3/3 надо?
⚡14❤7❤🔥4🎉1🐳1👀1👌1🔥1
WS TOPS vs SUBSCRIBERS🏆 QUALIFICATION TOURNAMENT#8 〰〰〰〰〰 🫂ИГРОКОВ: 16 🏆PRIZE: SLOT ON THE WS TOPS vs SUBSCRIBERS с призовым фондом 150💸 ✅SLOT: YOU+12 SUB | 120💸| 70🪙 👤SPONSORS: 1) WS 💬Связь/вопросы: @WATCHMMME 〰〰〰〰〰 ⏺UC СЕРВИС 24/7 UC за 3 сек - @NIKLOSUC_bot 🤩
👌2💯2🤝2
Добейте 100 реакций по братски🐸
❤4
FULL✅
WS TOPS vs SUBSCRIBERS🏆 QUALIFICATION TOURNAMENT#7 〰〰〰〰〰 🫂ИГРОКОВ: 16 🏆PRIZE: SLOT ON THE WS TOPS vs SUBSCRIBERS с призовым фондом 150💸 ✅SLOT: YOU+12 SUB | 120💸| 70🪙 👤SPONSORS: 1) WS 💬Связь/вопросы: @WATCHMMME 〰〰〰〰〰 ⏺UC СЕРВИС 24/7 UC за 3 сек - @NIKLOSUC_bot 🤩
❤2
FULL✅
❤1
Список услуг предоставляемые нами💼 🏆Приобрести проверку в топ - ЖМИ 🎓Приобрести обучение в нашей школе для оргов - ЖМИ 📈Приобрести проект по продвижению - ЖМИ 💬Приобрести рекламу - ЖМИ 🫂Приобрести спонсорку - ЖМИ по вопросам и покупке писать: @slzzzm044 @WATCHMMME
Один из последних отборочных турниров на масштабку с призовым фондом 150$
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 153 posts we hold for @ws_organization. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ws_organization edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 18 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 10 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 14 posts on @ws_organization as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 8 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 21 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 9
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
WHO WIN?
- AWER🇪🇪60%
- WISKAS🇺🇦40%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
WHO WIN?
- PAHAN🇷🇺74%
- SMASH🇷🇺29%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
WHO WIN?
- TITIVA🇺🇦37%
- ORUSS🇰🇬63%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
WHO WIN?
- MURASHEK🇷🇺21%
- CVV🇺🇦79%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
WHO WIN?
- CHEBA🇺🇦68%
- SINDZY🇷🇺36%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
WHO WIN?
- AXSEN🇺🇦36%
- WHYME🇺🇿64%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@fovaritTDM · 9617 postssstSenkay_Organization🇲🇩
@bysenkay · 26812 postssst/onvALEXxcom
@a1expubgm · 18711 postsonã frozzyyy
@sbdvdhudnd · 12010 posts𝘿𝙐𝙍𝙆𝘼𝙕𝙕🇷🇺
@DURKAZZ228 · 3,5329 postsWind 🇺🇦
@windnn1 · 2248 postsk.
@kartotrapp · 3426 posts𝟗𝟏𝟏𝐬𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬
@slosedness · 1565 postsonã VINAMOR eup
@VINAMORx69 · 4684 postsDEILL PubgM
@DEILLpm · 373 postsKARMA🇷🇺
@KARMA611 · 963 postsSST TDM🇷🇺
@SSTpubgm · 3993 postsLOUIS TDM
@louis_tdm · 1693 postsaveDAIKIT1
@BRODYAGA_tom · 742 posts𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐒𝐄𝐈
@Senselpubrm777 · 2422 postsARSLAN PM 🇺🇿
@arslanpm · 1,6412 postsЗабрал тег
@avangardpm · 12 posts𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗖𝗥𝗢𝗡 𝗣𝗨𝗕𝗚𝗠
@unicronpubgm · 1832 posts𝐄𝐔𝐑𝐎 𝐄𝐌𝐏𝐈𝐑𝐄🇪🇺
@EUROTDMM · 2171 post𝐒𝐏𝐄𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋 𝐑𝐀𝐈𝐃 𝐓𝐄𝐀𝐌
@SpacialRaidTeam · 8831 posthotVorzok
@Vorzok446 · 5601 postWATCHME
@WATCHHHME · 2141 postAXSEN WW
@axsenpubgm · 1,7501 postDESIRE COMPANY
@desirecompanypm · 6041 postNEEX🇧🇾
@neextdm_org · 3421 postSayway PubgM
@sayway_pubg · 681 post𝟏𝟒𝟎𝟖 𝐓𝐃𝐌🏳️
@tdmcis1408 · 851 postᴠᴘᴏᴛᴏᴋᴇ ɢᴀᴍɪɴɢ ᴘᴜʙɢ ᴍᴏʙɪʟᴇ
@vpotokegaming · 2261 postWISAD EDITOR
@wisadedit · 2051 postZODD WIN🇺🇦
@zoddn1TDMpubgm · 3,8951 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 21 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@NIKLOSPUBG · 24,7256 posts𝐍𝐎 𝐅𝐎𝐕𝐀𝐑𝐈𝐓
@fovaritTDM · 964 postsLOUIS TDM
@louis_tdm · 1694 postssst/onvALEXxcom
@a1expubgm · 1873 postsWind 🇺🇦
@windnn1 · 2243 postssstSenkay_Organization🇲🇩
@bysenkay · 2682 postsk.
@kartotrapp · 3422 postsSayway PubgM
@sayway_pubg · 682 postsonã frozzyyy
@sbdvdhudnd · 1202 postsonã VINAMOR eup
@VINAMORx69 · 4682 postsARSLAN PM 🇺🇿
@arslanpm · 1,6411 postAXSEN WW
@axsenpubgm · 1,7501 postBARDAK
@bardak_org · 7761 postaveDAIKIT1
@BRODYAGA_tom · 741 post.
@cheba180 · 1381 postDEILL PubgM
@DEILLpm · 371 post𝘿𝙐𝙍𝙆𝘼𝙕𝙕🇷🇺
@DURKAZZ228 · 3,5321 post・KoLibri・
@KoLibri2024 · 3511 postWALKERS
@newwalkerslll · 1,6081 post𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐍 𝐓𝐃𝐌
@onevennnnn · 6001 post𝟗𝟏𝟏𝐬𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬
@slosedness · 1561 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@EUROTDMM · 21716 postsFOLLOW TDM💋
@followtdm · 1066 posts𝑴𝑰𝑺𝑯𝑨𝑵𝒀𝑨 𝑨𝑮𝑬𝑵𝑪𝒀
@mishanya_garant1 · 1,6126 postsAXSEN WW
@axsenpubgm · 1,7505 postsОТЗЫВЫ/ ВЫПЛАТЫ WS ORGANIZATION
@WATCHMExSKITLZTOURNAMENT · 255 postsF16 TDM
@F16_TEAM_TDM · 5274 postsHSG LEGENDS
@hsgLEgends · 5474 posts𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐍 𝐓𝐃𝐌
@onevennnnn · 6004 posts𝟗𝟏𝟏 𝐓𝐃𝐌🇵🇹🇦🇿
@TDM_911 · 6414 posts𝐍𝐎 𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐂𝐘
@NMKLAN · 6803 posts𝐓𝐁𝐅 𝐓𝐃𝐌 🏳️
@TBFTDM · 1,2743 postsCOBRA
@cobrasoon · 6852 posts𝙁𝙇𝙊𝙍𝙀𝙉𝙎 𝙏𝘿𝙈
@FLORENSx666 · 6162 postsLEROY
@B0P008 · 3931 post𝐁𝐋𝟏𝐙𝐀𝐑𝐓 𝐄𝐃𝐈𝐓
@bl1zartedit · 4031 post𝕵𝖊𝖗𝖗𝖞 𝕯𝖊𝖘𝖎𝖌𝖓
@JERRYsign · 3351 postюз
@klllx52 · 31 postNEEX🇧🇾
@neextdm_org · 3421 post𝑁𝐸𝑌𝑆𝑂𝑁 𝑂𝑅𝐺𝐴𝑁𝐼𝑍𝐴𝑇𝐼𝑂𝑁
@neysonisback · 2501 post𝐎𝐍𝐀 𝐓𝐃𝐌
@onatdmclan · 8361 postSKYWAY
@SKYWAYsoonN1 · 1,9671 postsftk
@softickpm · 2681 post🚫 xsun/sprt ANTICHEAT
@SPARTAanticheat · 2641 postTITIVA
@titivaa · 1551 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WS ORGANIZATION” (@ws_organization), 7,389 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ws_organization.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.