Posted without readable text

Channel
Writers world
@writerswrld
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
14,595subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001421110494 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @writerswrld |
| Description | This channel is created to publish talent from anywhere. Anyone who want to join our community or have their material featured here is my link @Writerswrldbot |
| Created | 31 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/writerswrld |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 14,595 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 14,597 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 14,608 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 14,610 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 14,624 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 14,629 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 14,636 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 14,637 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 14,637 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- —
- no view readings in window
- Avg views / post
- —
- no view readings
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 March 2025 – 17 July 2026) |
| Views total | — |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 423
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 103
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
606 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 410 | 67.7% | |
| 👍 | 64 | 10.6% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 8.42% | |
| 👏 | 25 | 4.13% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 2.48% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 1.98% | |
| 😢 | 12 | 1.98% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 1.32% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 0.825% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.165% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.165% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 606reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
❤25👏6🔥6🕊1
Signed Dissonance
life is fucking beautiful, man!
❤53😱5☃2
Signed Dissonance
Maybe it was in choosing someone who had seen every version of you and still wanted to be there when everything simmered down and was boring. Maybe it was in choosing someone who had choose you in the process of choosing themselves! # yemirok
❤50👍5
Signed Dissonance
It wasn’t just that he left...it was how he walked away carrying the version of her that believed people never lie with love...
❤26❤🔥7👍1👏1
Signed Dissonance
I love you in shades of blue
❤14👏3
Signed Dissonance
All of a sudden I see your name somewhere and all I wanna do is scream at this world, hate everyone and everything. I want to rebel against waves of life I want to choke my heart I want to squeeze you out of my soul just so I could be normal again and not have that gutting feeling inside my heart. Oh love how cruel you are #J.z
❤19🔥13⚡3
Signed Dissonance
Perhaps you could tell me lies just to keep my fire burning #a_desperate_soul
👏9❤4
Signed Dissonance
The kiss drowned my thought The pleasure blinded my sight The touch numbed the pain Hot blood coursing through my vien Not as toxic Just a way to forget and escape the reality thats hectic
❤27👏6⚡4
Signed Dissonance
You, dear one, are a beautiful canvas with a rotting soul. That is why you crave what you can not see. That is why you dig beyond your realm. And it is also why you have plasters taped on all your mirrors.
❤19🔥3
Signed Dissonance
Out of Love ❤️📜 When the darkness arrive, and you are all alone. Turned into a couple. It's your time to reshape, the darkness is there for you. The streets are quiet and the noise is gone Ya feel a deep void in your brains, Ya want to fill that void. Instead of thinking deep and going beyond the dimensions. You open tick tock/ Instagram. Guess what will fill the void? People's thoughts, based on their own personal…
❤30🥰1
Signed Haine
"The Worst Kind of Shadows" The worst kind of feelings are the ones you can’t carve into stone, can’t drown in the river, or set aflame in the yard. They linger— like the ghost of a touch on skin that no longer remembers warmth, like a song half-remembered, hummed wrong in the dark. You wear them like a coat stitched from unanswered questions, each thread a *why* that knots itself tighter with every breath. And t…
🔥14❤11👍7❤🔥2⚡1
Signed Haine
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @writerswrld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,108,417 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@writerswrld named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Writers world” (@writerswrld), 14,595 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/writerswrld.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.