Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for -writer's home-

Channel

-writer's home-

@writershow

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,712subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002039434714
TypeChannel
Username@writershow
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/writershow

Growth

7,6957,7507,722.518 August 2026 — 7,750 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,743 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,716 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,695 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,699 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,712 subscribers7,71218 August 20262 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 14 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,687–7,758 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 05:347,712+13
30 Aug 2026, 09:127,699+4
27 Aug 2026, 00:567,695-21
23 Aug 2026, 14:147,716-27
19 Aug 2026, 19:127,743-7
18 Aug 2026, 23:157,750first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 7,712 subscribers
Avg views / post
898
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held49 (2 August 202626 August 2026)
Views total35,909
Reactions total953
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,463 reactions across 41 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥49133.6%
💔20313.9%
🌚1208.20%
1097.45%
💘1087.38%
👍1077.31%
🍓815.54%
🔥704.78%
🐳553.76%
😭422.87%
👌332.26%
👀231.57%
👏211.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,463 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC528 views22 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍13🍓9

26 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC535 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://t.me/writershow/8595 راستی مهلا من اوندفعه میخواستم درباره‌ی این پیامت نظرمو بگم، که یادم رفت. راستش با این حرفت اصلا موافق نیستم. چون اصلا یه وقتایی نمیشه کپی نکرد. مثلا من این جمله‌ها رو از تو کتابا یاد گرفتم و ازشون استفاده میکنم: چشمانش را با شیطنت در حدقه چرخاند. در عمق نگاهش غم می‌درخشید. و... از این قبیل جمله‌ها. یا جدیدا جمله‌ی نیم‌رخش پیرتر از تمام رخش بود رو که یه جا خونده بودم، تو داستانم است

26 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC504 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026

کمک گرفتن از متخصص بیشتر به درد کسایی می‌خوره که حداقل تجربه نوشتن برای بیشتر از ۶ ماه تا ۱ سال رو دارن. یا داستان تاحالا تموم کردن. نسبتا قلمشون پخته‌تر شده، حالا یک نفر میاد و این پختگی رو بیشتر می‌کنه. ولی کسی که تازه شروع می‌کنه، باید آموزش ببینه، کتاب بخونه و بنویسه.

9

26 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC516 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026

و این‌که قرار نیست از همون اول یک نفر داستان شما رو بخونه و تمام ایرادات رو بگه. تجربه کردن هم بخشی از مسیره. نویسنده باید خودش با نوشتن و خوندن زیاد به یک سری مسائل برسه و اصلاحشون کنه!

❤‍🔥85

26 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC522 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026

کارهایی می‌تونید انجام بدید؟ کمک گرفتن از یک دوست: می‌تونه نظرش رو به عنوان خواننده بیان کنه. کمک گرفتن از یک متخصص: می‌تونه تخصصی داستان رو بررسی کنه و ایرادات و نقاط ضعف و قوتش رو بگه. انتشار مجازی داستان: می‌تونید خواننده جذب کنید و از نظراتشون استفاده کنید.

❤‍🔥19

26 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC531 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026

نویسنده‌ها قبل از وجود هوش مصنوعی چیکار می‌کردن :)؟

👍16

26 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC529 viewsread 28 August 2026

مهلا یه سوال میگن برای نقد از هوش مصنوعی استفاده نکنیم به جاش چیکار میشه کرد؟ از کجا ایرادمون رو بفهمیم وقتی کس دیگه‌ای نیست؟

24 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC759 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026

جلسات خصوصی با خودم که به صورت تخصصی روی داستانت کار می‌شه. تحلیل+ نقد+ بررسی نقاط قوت و ضعف+ کار کردن روی طرح‌ و پی‌رنگ داستان و ایده‌پردازی برای گره‌هایی داستانی. در کنارش اگه قلمت نیاز داشت تمرین شخصی‌سازی برای تقویت مهارتی که بیشتر توی داستان لازمت می‌شه بهت می‌دم. خیلی خیلی خلاصه کلیتش رو گفتم، بعدا بیشتر وارد جزئیات می‌شم. 🤍✨

❤‍🔥25

24 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC748 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

سلام خوبین؟ کوچ شخصی چیه؟ 🦕

🌚8

24 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC739 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026

ظرفیت کوچ‌شخصی هم به صورت خیلی محدود به زودی باز می‌شه🩶✨

❤‍🔥9

24 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC734 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

بیشتر دوست دارید یه چالش بریم که باهم بنویسیم یا کتاب بخونیم؟

  1. بنویسیم 🤍⌨️73%
  2. بخونیم ✨️📖43%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTC720 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

یه نظرسنجی می‌ذارم بگید کدوم ترجیحتونه.

👍51

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @writershow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTCAnonymous Poll243 voters

بیشتر دوست دارید یه چالش بریم که باهم بنویسیم یا کتاب بخونیم؟

  1. بنویسیم 🤍⌨️73%
  2. بخونیم ✨️📖43%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BOOKESTUN
@BOOKESTUNN · 31,340
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 6 September 2026
شهر کتاب
@nbookcity · 31,791
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“-writer's home-” (@writershow), 7,712 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/writershow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.