Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PokerX🇨🇳德州ai Wpkai 微扑克ai辅助外挂wepoker

Channel

PokerX🇨🇳德州ai Wpkai 微扑克ai辅助外挂wepoker

@wpkai0001

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,239subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001762838400
TypeChannel
Username@wpkai0001
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wpkai0001

Growth

3,2313,2393,23523 Aug 2026, 05:00 — 3,231 subscribers24 Aug 2026, 06:24 — 3,239 subscribers23 Aug 2026, 05:0024 Aug 2026, 06:24
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,230–3,240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 06:243,239+8
23 Aug 2026, 05:003,231first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.8%
avg views ÷ 3,239 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.076%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held12 (21 July 202623 August 2026)
Views total13,063
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

上周(8.10-8.16)后台数据统计:431w燃油,共打了162w手,抽水后总盈利81.5w美金,汇率6.75,合计550w人民币,每百手盈利在339人民币,与上周盈利情况持平 观望中的直接来免费测试,别人都在吃肉了,你还没入行!!!

17 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

客户反馈:没早点知道有ai,怕把局打散了 观望中的可免费测试 唯一:@WpkAi1 双向联系:@PokerX1_bot #德州Ai #WpkAi #PokerX #德州 #德州扑克 #微扑克 #wpk #wepoker #德扑之星 #AA扑克

15 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC≈1,490 views2 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

上周(8.3-8.9)后台数据统计:415w燃油,共打了149w手,抽水后总盈利75.5w美金,汇率6.75,合计509w人民币,每百手盈利在341人民币,百手盈利环比上周大幅度提升,这周太忙,忘记发战报!!现在才想起来 观望中的直接来免费测试,别人都在吃肉了,你还没入行!!!

2

13 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC588 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

客户反馈 观望中的可免费测试 唯一:@WpkAi1 双向联系:@PokerX1_bot #德州Ai #WpkAi #PokerX #德州 #德州扑克 #微扑克 #wpk #wepoker #德扑之星

9 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈1,810 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

客户反馈 观望中的可免费测试 唯一:@WpkAi1 双向联系:@PokerX1_bot #德州Ai #WpkAi #PokerX #德州 #德州扑克 #微扑克 #wpk #wepoker #德扑之星

1

8 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC715 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

客户反馈 观望中的可免费测试 唯一:@WpkAi1 双向联系:@PokerX1_bot #德州Ai #WpkAi #PokerX #德州 #德州扑克 #微扑克 #wpk #wepoker #德扑之星

7 Aug 2026, 04:24 UTC≈1,690 views0 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

上周后台数据统计:390w燃油,共打了133w手,抽水后总盈利49.4w美金,汇率6.75,合计334w人民币,每百手盈利在251人民币,百手盈利环比上周出现波动,但还是很可观 观望中的直接来免费测试。 #德州Ai #WpkAi #PokerX #德州 #德州扑克 #微扑克 #wpk #wepoker #德扑之星 #AA扑克

28 Jul 2026, 17:36 UTC≈2,170 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

多开(12开)客户打2-4暴击联盟局单周数据: 猛猛盈利 观望中的可免费测试 唯一:@WpkAi1 双向联系:@PokerX1_bot #德州Ai #WpkAi #PokerX #德州 #德州扑克 #微扑克 #wpk #wepoker #德扑之星

1

27 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC≈2,110 views3 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

上周后台数据统计:409w燃油,共打了138w手,抽水后总盈利82.56w美金,汇率6.75,合计557.28w人民币,每百手盈利在404人民币,百手盈利比上周下局142,出现波动,但还是很可观 观望中的直接来免费测试。 #德州Ai #WpkAi #PokerX #德州 #德州扑克 #微扑克 #wpk #wepoker #德扑之星 #AA扑克

3

25 Jul 2026, 20:39 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

客户反馈:赢到不敢打了 观望中的直接来免费测试。 唯一:@WpkAi1 双向联系:@PokerX1_bot #德州Ai #WpkAi #PokerX #德州 #德州扑克 #微扑克 #wpk #wepoker #德扑之星

24 Jul 2026, 19:04 UTC≈1,940 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

新版PokerX: Wepoker更新已完成。提示请更新平台应用找管理员更新 唯一:@WpkAi1

21 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC≈2,100 views2 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

上周后台数据统计:469.4w燃油,共打了141.1w手,抽水后总盈利135.42w美金,汇率6.75,合计778.67w人民币,每百手盈利在552人民币,百手盈利比上周提升152,逐步提升。 观望中的直接来免费测试。 想自己看后台的玩家请联系管理员 唯一:@WpkAi1 双向联系:@PokerX1_bot #德州Ai #WpkAi #PokerX #德州 #德州扑克 #微扑克 #wpk #wepoker #德扑之星

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @wpkai0001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,358,496 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PokerX🇨🇳德州ai Wpkai 微扑克ai辅助外挂wepoker” (@wpkai0001), 3,239 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wpkai0001.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.