Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NFT Our future

Channel

NFT Our future

@worsmatex

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

31subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003094888105
TypeChannel
Username@worsmatex
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 26 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/worsmatex

Growth

313231.58 August 2026 — 32 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32 subscribers30 August 2026 — 31 subscribers8 August 202630 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 21 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31–32 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 08:3831-1
11 Aug 2026, 01:4632no change
8 Aug 2026, 23:3032first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 26 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

149 reactions across 14 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53821644150197686382818.8%
2516.8%
custom 5472279086657199080117.38%
🔥117.38%
custom 537733622753396989296.04%
❤‍🔥96.04%
👍96.04%
custom 544084110287151705585.37%
custom 542940583834526532774.70%
custom 523598927902437356653.36%
custom 546342402373401498053.36%
👎53.36%
custom 541792407650306211142.68%
🥰42.68%
👏21.34%
💯21.34%
🍓10.671%
😁10.671%
🤗10.671%
🤩10.671%
1 further kind10.671%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2025 to 31 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2025, 16:17 UTC176 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ребята всех поздравляю с Новым годом , вас и ваших родителей , желаю чтобы вы и ваши родители были в первую очередь здоровыми так как это то , что является выше чем любые деньги , хотелки , мечты Где есть здоровый человек, там и поражаются от него мысли Не думайте о деньгах , каждый в 2026 получит столько сколько получится с его сил , не в них счастье что было доказано мной и многими людьми в этой сфере ребята Даже

3❤‍🔥1🍓1🔥1

30 Nov 2025, 18:14 UTC219 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🎁 ЗАВТРА ДЕНЬ РОЖДЕНИЯ — ПЕПЫ! Именно 1 декабря Telegram выпустил целую пачку легендарных гифтов: 🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁 и, конечно же, легендарную Пепу 🎁. Завтра этим подаркам исполняется ровно год! И кто знает… может, в честь годовщины Telegram наконец порадует нас новыми улучшениями.

18 Nov 2025, 12:19 UTC196 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

СЛИТОЕ УЛЧШЕНИЕ НА РЕДО? 🎁

1❤‍🔥1👏1

25 Oct 2025, 17:35 UTC297 views16 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ждем улучшений уже: 🎁252 дня 🎁234 дня 🎁🎁 229 дней 🎁222 дня 🎁186 дней 🎁175 дней 🎁🎁🎁168 дней 🎁🎁144 дня 🎁144 дня 🎁🎁🎁111 дней 🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁 70 дней 🎁🎁 54 дня 🎁🎁 53 дня 🎁🎁🎁 15 дней

5❤‍🔥4🔥4👎2🤮1

21 Oct 2025, 14:15 UTC349 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

☠️УДАЛЕННЫЕ КЕПКИ Топ самых дорогих из удаленных кепок🎁 1. Durov's Cap #443 2. Durov's Cap #512 3. Durov's Cap #785 4. Durov's Cap #1015 5. Durov's Cap #1031 6. Durov's Cap #1287 7. Durov's Cap #1377 8. Durov's Cap #1480 9. Durov's Cap #1536 10. Durov's Cap #1586 11. Durov's Cap #1975 12. Durov's Cap #2106 13. Durov's Cap #2609 14. Durov's Cap #2658 15. Durov's Cap #2669 16. Durov's Cap #2743 17. Durov's Cap #2778 1

4👍3🔥2👎1

20 Oct 2025, 12:37 UTC394 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🎁 13 фигурок дурова забрали за 32,000$ чистый профит 24,000$ Как вам?))

3❤‍🔥3💯2🔥2🥰2

18 Oct 2025, 16:30 UTC328 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

– Новые подарки скоро? У репера Snoop Dogg день рождение 20 октября, в честь этого может выйти новая коллекция от репера или памп ранее выпущенных подарков 🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁

4👍2🔥2👏1🤗1🤩1🥰1

10 Oct 2025, 07:03 UTC316 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

В своем последнем посте Дуров спалил набор эмодзи с будущими подарками. Работяги, готовьте звезды 💵

4👍3👎2😁1

9 Oct 2025, 17:18 UTC268 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🦸‍♂️ Дроп подарков уже завтра! 🗓 Завтра 10 октября, день рождения Дурова, а значит скорее всего в течении дня мы увидим новые подарки или улучшения! На прошлое день рождения вышли 🎁🎁🎁 ⏫ Также скорее всего в ближайшее время мы увидим огромное обновление на тг со всеми нововведениями, о которых говорили раньше!

1👍1🥰1

5 Oct 2025, 11:53 UTC248 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤑 Чем там богатые дышут? Наша ежедневная рубрика о топовых продажах Black-фонов за последние прошедшие сутки! Сегодня более интересные сделки у нас, чем вчера, весь список ниже! 🎁 Топ продажи Black-фонов за прошедшие сутки: Top Hat #14152 - 1605 TON (4502$) через GetGems Snow Globe #37402 - 250 TON (703$) через Portals Voodoo Doll #11986 - 200 TON (561$) через Portals. Забавный факт - покупатель данного гифта полу

30 Sept 2025, 12:16 UTC197 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🎁Perfume Bottle Noir на чёрном фоне проданы за 2 000 💎/$5 342 📊Теперь это топ 1 продажа духов по стоимости на GetGems 🤴Хотел бы себе такие?

custom 53821644150197686384custom 53773362275339698922custom 54294058383452653272custom 54722790866571990802custom 54179240765030621111

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @worsmatex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,220,605 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NFT Our future” (@worsmatex), 31 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/worsmatex.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.