Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Captain Arti | Кто я без костюма | Marvel Cosplay

@worldofarti

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

936subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002716650645
TypeChannel
Username@worldofarti
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/worldofarti

Growth

935936935.56 Aug 2026, 19:31 — 935 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:20 — 936 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:317 Aug 2026, 00:20
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 935–936 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 00:20936+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:31935first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.7%
avg views ÷ 936 subscribers
Avg views / post
437
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held12 (26 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total5,244
Reactions total789
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

789 reactions across 12 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥24731.3%
🤣15119.1%
👍719.00%
custom 5264811159575356287627.86%
custom 5264952846251484789617.73%
custom 5095942533079368717384.82%
💯374.69%
custom 5193007599968087971313.93%
custom 5427342093674630148273.42%
custom 5318812672446187819243.04%
custom 5353046954819462401141.77%
🙈111.39%
🤩60.76%
❤‍🔥30.38%
custom 519529782255920284110.127%
custom 524683595264243466610.127%
10.127%
🏆10.127%
🤡10.127%
🦄10.127%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 789reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC278 views57 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Новая деталь пазла

👍27🔥14🤩6custom 50959425330793687174custom 52648111595753562874custom 53188126724461878192

4 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC331 views75 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩Капитан готов ко взлету 🥵

🔥36🤣19👍12custom 52648111595753562874custom 53188126724461878192🏆1custom 50959425330793687171

4 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC336 views72 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Путешествие в Астану началось! Как думаете, примут капитана Америку в Казахстане?

🔥36🤣18💯12custom 52648111595753562873❤‍🔥1custom 50959425330793687171custom 53188126724461878191

4 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC330 views56 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩Еще одна часть костюма! Ну что, соберете пазл?🥵

custom 526481115957535628724🔥18custom 54273420936746301487custom 50959425330793687174👍1custom 51930075999680879711custom 53188126724461878191

3 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC334 views49 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Доигрался

🤣25custom 531881267244618781910💯7custom 52648111595753562873🔥2custom 50959425330793687171custom 52468359526424346661

3 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC346 views60 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Угадай образ

🤣27custom 535304695481946240114🙈9custom 53188126724461878197custom 52648111595753562872custom 50959425330793687171

2 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC382 views48 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🤩Вот так Марвел звали Криса Эванса в Судный день когда все деньги ушли на Роберта Дауни младшего (даже на костюм денег не осталось)

🤣27💯8🔥8🙈2custom 51930075999680879711custom 52648111595753562871custom 53188126724461878191

31 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC508 views99 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩Вот вам небольшой спойлер нового костюма под Астану🥵

custom 526495284625148478945🔥30custom 526481115957535628718👍4💯1custom 50959425330793687171

30 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC565 views69 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

😎Что со мной происходит при виде старушки:

🤣35custom 526495284625148478915👍11custom 52648111595753562873❤‍🔥21🦄1custom 50959425330793687171

28 Jul 2026, 18:30 UTC612 views74 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🤩А вот и то самое финальное выступление с дыркой 😑на жопе😾

🔥30custom 509594253307936871720custom 519300759996808797114custom 54273420936746301487💯2🤡1

27 Jul 2026, 18:50 UTC563 views56 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩Только появилась новость о том, что Райан Гослинг — новый призрачный гонщик!🫸 Стоит задуматься о том, что бы делать образ духа мщения?💀

🔥31custom 542734209367463014813💯7👍3custom 50959425330793687171custom 52649528462514847891

26 Jul 2026, 20:20 UTC659 views74 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Заглянул на Акимару, рад был там всех увидеть, даже не ожидал такой атмосферы и множества крутых костюмов Сцена кстати тоже там крутая)

🔥42custom 519300759996808797115👍13custom 50959425330793687173custom 51952978225592028411

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @worldofarti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 267,472 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Captain Arti | Кто я без костюма | Marvel Cosplay” (@worldofarti), 936 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/worldofarti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.