Channel
@workshopwb
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,984subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001770310603 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @workshopwb |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/workshopwb |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @malinamalinanat/359930 Aug 2025, 16:01 UTC | @workshopwb/2245 · this entry30 Aug 2025, 16:03 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @malinamalinanat/36022 Sept 2025, 09:18 UTC | @workshopwb/2248 · this entry2 Sept 2025, 09:19 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @malinamalinanat/36032 Sept 2025, 09:22 UTC | @workshopwb/2249 · this entry2 Sept 2025, 09:22 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @malinamalinanat/36093 Sept 2025, 07:10 UTC | @workshopwb/2255 · this entry3 Sept 2025, 07:10 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @workshopwb/2258 · this entry3 Sept 2025, 15:33 UTC | @malinamalinanat/36123 Sept 2025, 15:34 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @malinamalinanat/36164 Sept 2025, 07:20 UTC | @workshopwb/2262 · this entry4 Sept 2025, 07:20 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @malinamalinanat | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (4–3) |
| @malina_wildberries | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (4–3) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 7 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 August 2025 to 4 September 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @malinamalinanat. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 1,984 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 1,986 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:10 | 1,986 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 30 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 40.7% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 31.5% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 9.26% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2025 to 4 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Классная новость - цены ниже на 50-70% 🔥 На WB сейчас акция Скажу честно: я сама кайфую от акций Сегодня купила платье за 500₽, которое раньше стоило 2000 😅 И да, мои трусики сейчас тоже по акции — по самой вкусной цене Потом цены вырастут, поэтому ловите момент сейчас 👙 Заказать набор трусиков по самой низкой цене 🔥
👍2❤1🔥1
Производство трусиков как медитация Я могу заказать на старой фабрике и «не париться». Но ищу новые производства, чтобы качество росло, а себестоимость снижалась Потому что маржа решает. И на длинной дистанции именно она даёт стабильность бренду
❤1👏1🔥1
Отзывы = лучший инструмент роста Многие боятся отзывов. А я наоборот жду Если пишут: «Очень качественные трусики, дочка в восторге» — значит, идём в правильном направлении Если что-то не так — дорабатываем Это не минус, это подсказка, как стать лучше
❤3👏1🔥1
И снова 3 сентября … 🍂
❤2👍2😁1
Бренд — это не про «отшил и забыл». Каждый цвет, каждая ткань проходят через меня Сейчас отшиваю новую партию — в новом трендовом цвете Магия производства 👀
❤1👏1🔥1
✍️ Михаил Шуфутинский печатает
🔥2❤1👍1
2 сентября… 😃🥰
❤4🔥2👏1
Мое 1 сентября в 11 классе ❤️
❤2🔥2👏1
Предложила Марку фотку: «Запрыгивай ко мне на руки». Он — «мама, ты серьёзно? Я взрослый!» 😂 Договорились так: сейчас он ко мне, а в 11 классе — наоборот, поднимет меня. Я фанат своих детей. Но, честно, терпение им со мной нужно железное 🙈 И директор школы добавил драму: «Эти первоклассники выпустятся в 2036 году». 2036, Карл! У меня к тому времени, надеюсь, будет не только бизнес-империя, но и нервы, чтобы пережить…
❤2🔥2👏1
1 сентября. Амелия — выступает как королева ❤️ Гипс только сняли, но она даже в гипсе тренировалась. Дисциплине мне у дочери точно учиться надо 😅
🔥2❤1👏1
✏️ 1 сентября у нас прошло очень семейно
❤2🔥2👏1
💥 Сколько можно ждать «идеального момента»? Пока вы думаете — мои трусы разлетелись на 7 млн этим летом 📌 Вышла 27 мая со своим брендом И на сегодняшний день: 📊 Заказов — 10,5 млн 💰 Выкупов — 7 млн 👙 4475 девушек уже носят мои трусики И знаете, что самое обидное для «ждунов»? Я начинала с тех же сомнений, но просто взяла и сделала Не ждала курса доллара, не ждала «после отпуска», не ждала «чуть позже» ✨ Систем…
❤2👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @workshopwb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 843,831 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Агентство Натальи Малиновской по Wildberries” (@workshopwb), 1,984 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/workshopwb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.