Сообщество, где кожа говорит устами экспертов. Уход за кожей, рекомендованный дерматологами.
La Roche-Posay, Vichy.
Заявление https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67b2ef38b88a4b4c0af1ee56
ry-019c6ae02f1e7141925e27fe0ae177db
Created
11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
14 measurements spanning 13 days, net -40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,299–12,351 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Aug 2026, 10:02
12,305
-3
18 Aug 2026, 13:08
12,308
+1
17 Aug 2026, 09:34
12,307
-6
15 Aug 2026, 17:29
12,313
-2
14 Aug 2026, 06:08
12,315
-7
12 Aug 2026, 21:55
12,322
-3
11 Aug 2026, 18:53
12,325
-1
10 Aug 2026, 17:04
12,326
-11
9 Aug 2026, 15:18
12,337
-4
8 Aug 2026, 15:45
12,341
-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:02
12,342
-2
6 Aug 2026, 17:30
12,344
-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:06
12,345
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:44
12,345
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 20 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,040
Videos
≈49
Links
≈613
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
237 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
86
36.3%
❤
60
25.3%
👍
36
15.2%
🥰
19
8.02%
🤷
14
5.91%
🙏
10
4.22%
⚡
7
2.95%
👌
2
0.844%
😢
2
0.844%
🎉
1
0.422%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 29 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
14.3%
1 of 7 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,690
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,700
over 6 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjeN9qtE
1
20 April 2026
20 April 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 29 April 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Моете голову, но не чувствуете, что она чистая на 100%? 💇🚿
Возможно, на коже скопились ороговевшие клетки, остатки сухого шампуня или кожного сала.
Говорят, проблему решает детокс скальпа — попросили дерматолога и трихолога Лианну Казарян объяснить, как он работает и кому подходит.
А в каких вы отношениях с перхотью?
😢 — близкие подруги
🙏 — она иногда заглядывает в гости
🔥 — ни разу не встречались
#СловоЭксперту…
📝 На упаковке написано: «Сокращает морщины».
Да-да. Но кто вообще решил, что сыворотка, которую вы купили вчера, дает какой-то эффект?
Продукты проходят через клинические исследования — о них и рассказываем в новом эпизоде подкаста «Слово коже: Диалоги с экспертами».
Слушайте выпуск в Apple Podcasts, на Яндекс Музыке и ВКонтакте. Подключайтесь, чтобы знать о производстве косметики еще больше ✨
#Подкаст
Подписыва…
🪒 Сколько раз вы слышали, что бритва делает волосы жесткими?
Мы слышим постоянно, поэтому попросили дерматолога Алену Щербатых объяснить, верить этому или нет, а заодно дать инструкцию по бритью для чайников.
Не поскупитесь на огонечки, если хотите, чтобы Алена разобрала мифы о лазерной эпиляции 🪴
#СловоВолосам #СловоЭксперту
Да, этот пост снова о ретиноле 😀
Точнее, о его природном младшем брате бакучиоле, который расположил к себе миллионы обладательниц чувствительной кожи мягкостью и дружелюбием.
Спросили у дерматовенеролога и косметолога Ирины Гнединой, чем он лучше обычного ретинола и как вводить его в уход.
А как вы относитесь к бакучиолу?
🥰 — нравится!
⚡️ — не зашло
🤷 — пока не пробовал(-а)
#СловоЭксперту #СловоИнгредиенту
❔Черные точки или сальные нити — вот в чем вопрос.
Разбираемся с косметологом и дерматологом Елизаветой Гинтовт, что это за загадочные сальные нити и чем они отличаются от темных собратьев. Листайте карточки!
А если ищете средство для умывания, которое способно помочь от комедонов, попробуйте Очищающий пенящийся гель Effaclar для чувствительной жирной кожи лица и тела от La Roche-Posay. Он бережно удаляет загрязнен…
👍12❤11🔥5
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @wordtoskin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
По данным исследований и измерениям состояния кожи77%
По впечатлениям участников от использования средства6%
По внешней оценке кожи после нанесения продукта13%
По отзывам о том, как средство ощущается на коже4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 29 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 244,222 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Слово коже” (@wordtoskin), 12,305 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wordtoskin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
