Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قدرت کلام

Channel

قدرت کلام

@wordpowerss

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,865subscribers

-341 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002097399199
TypeChannel
Username@wordpowerss
Descriptionبرای تولد ستاره ای رقصنده باید آشوب به پا کنی فردریش نیچه © این تنها کانال رسمی قدرت کلام در تلگرام میباشد محتواهای متفاوتی خواهیم داشت یوتوب : https://www.youtube.com/@wordpowers
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held53
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/wordpowerss

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

16,86017,21017,0357 August 2026 — 17,206 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,206 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,210 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,203 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,189 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,181 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,168 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,167 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,154 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,147 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,150 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,149 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,147 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,138 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,132 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,128 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,125 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,114 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,104 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,101 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,094 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,085 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,078 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,069 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,061 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,066 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,067 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,049 subscribers25 September 2026 — 17,041 subscribers4 October 2026 — 17,007 subscribers8 October 2026 — 16,999 subscribers13 October 2026 — 16,973 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,966 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,965 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,966 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,970 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,972 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,966 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,960 subscribers23 October 2026 — 16,954 subscribers24 October 2026 — 16,947 subscribers25 October 2026 — 16,926 subscribers26 October 2026 — 16,914 subscribers27 October 2026 — 16,902 subscribers28 October 2026 — 16,888 subscribers29 October 2026 — 16,894 subscribers30 October 2026 — 16,890 subscribers31 October 2026 — 16,887 subscribers1 November 2026 — 16,883 subscribers2 November 2026 — 16,875 subscribers3 November 2026 — 16,865 subscribers4 November 2026 — 16,860 subscribers5 November 2026 — 16,865 subscribers16,8657 August 20265 November 2026
53 measurements spanning 90 days, net -341. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,808–17,263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 53
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 12:1016,865+5
4 Nov 2026, 11:3616,860-5
3 Nov 2026, 12:0516,865-10
2 Nov 2026, 10:0516,875-8
1 Nov 2026, 11:2016,883-4
31 Oct 2026, 10:3616,887-3
30 Oct 2026, 09:1516,890-4
29 Oct 2026, 08:2816,894+6
28 Oct 2026, 06:5616,888-14
27 Oct 2026, 04:5716,902-12
26 Oct 2026, 08:0616,914-12
25 Oct 2026, 09:1916,926-21
24 Oct 2026, 06:1616,947-7
23 Oct 2026, 08:3116,954-6
22 Oct 2026, 05:4016,960-6
20 Oct 2026, 23:4116,966-6
19 Oct 2026, 19:0016,972+2
18 Oct 2026, 18:1816,970+4
17 Oct 2026, 16:5016,966+1
16 Oct 2026, 17:0616,965first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.2%
avg views ÷ 16,865 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,920
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held47 (29 June 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total88,540
Reactions total2,016
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 16:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
388
Videos
8
Links
160

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

5,989 reactions across 47 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,57976.5%
👍88414.8%
🔥1602.67%
👏901.50%
🤔550.918%
❤‍🔥540.902%
😭400.668%
👌340.568%
💔340.568%
💯240.401%
🤯210.351%
🙏140.234%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,989 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
117
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 47 we hold a reading for · 34%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wordpowerss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (11.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 08:46 UTC≈1,290 views101 reactionsread 5 November 2026

ریشه رو پرورش بده؛ شاخه‌ها و برگ‌ها خودشون رشد می‌کنن. «انسان خردمند از اینکه حرف‌هاش از عملش جلوتر باشند، شرم می‌کند.» «انسان خردمند آرامش داره، بدون اینکه مغرور باشه؛ انسان کوچک غرور داره، بدون اینکه آرامش داشته باشه.» «نگران این نباش که دیگران تو رو نمی‌شناسن؛ نگران این باش که آیا چیزی در خودت ساختی که ارزش شناخته شدن داشته باشه.» کنفوسیوس @wordpowerss

❤72👍20👌3🤯3🤔2❤‍🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 11:18 UTC≈2,520 views169 reactionsread 5 November 2026

خردمند کسی است که در حرف زدن محتاط و در عمل سریع باشد ! کنفوسیوس. بند 24 گفتار ها @wordpowerss

❤121👍42🔥6

2 Nov 2026, 07:33 UTC≈3,230 views177 reactionsread 5 November 2026

ترسوها بارها پیش از مرگشان می میرند؛ شجاع فقط یک بار طعم مرگ را میچشد ویلیام شکسپیر @wordpowerss

❤136👍21🔥10❤‍🔥7😭3

1 Nov 2026, 13:52 UTC≈3,650 views112 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤94🔥12👏4❤‍🔥2

1 Nov 2026, 10:38 UTC≈3,800 views149 reactionsread 5 November 2026

آدم با استعداد به هدفی میتواند بزند که دیگران نمیتوانند نشانه گیری کنند اما نابغه ها هدفی را میزنند که دیگران حتی نمیتوانند ببینند! آرتور شوپنهاور @wordpowerss

❤127🔥9👍5👏5🤔2😭1

31 Oct 2026, 12:43 UTC≈4,090 views86 reactionsread 5 November 2026

دوستان من یک معذرت خواهی هم کنم ، چون فکر میکردم همه عزیزان بدونن که ویدیو ها داخل یوتوب منتشر میشه ولی بعضی از دوستان نمیدونستن. از این به بعد لینک رو هم میزارم براتون که مستقیم وارد ویدیو بشید 🙏❤️ اون ویدیو هم همون روز منتشر شد اینم لینکش : https://youtu.be/hxy_yzdszu0

❤71🤯5👍4🙏4🔥2

31 Oct 2026, 12:39 UTC≈3,870 views126 reactionsread 5 November 2026

اگر کودکی را به خاطر شیطنت تنبیه کنید و به خاطر خوب بودنش پاداش دهید، او فقط به خاطر پاداش کار درست را انجام خواهد داد؛ و وقتی به جهان می رود و می بیند که خوبی همیشه پاداش نمی گیرد و شرارت همیشه مجازات نمی شود، به انسانی تبدیل می شود که فقط به این فکر می کند که چگونه می تواند در جهان پیش برود و درست یا نادرست را بر اساس منفعت خود انجام دهد. ایمانوئل کانت @wordpowerss

❤95👍19👌4👏4🔥4

27 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC≈5,550 views103 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Photo

اگر علاقه های زیادی داری، از این برتری برای ده سال آیندت استفاده کن! امروز ساعت 17:30 ❤️ یکی از روش های کاربردی بنجامین فرانکلین رو برای رشد همزمان چند علاقه رو بررسی میکنیم حتما کاغذ و قلم داشته باشید دیتای این ویدیو واقعا زیاده🔥

❤88👍8💯3🔥3🤔1

26 Oct 2026, 09:19 UTC≈5,880 views287 reactions2 Starsread 5 November 2026

توی این 30 سالی که عمر کردم و بیشتر از 300 تا کتاب که خوندم، فقط یه چیزیو خوب فهمیدم ما آدما فکر میکنیم همیشه فرصت برای تغییر داریم فکر میکنیم هر وقت بخوایم و اراده کنیم میتونیم به زندگیمون سر و سامون بدیم ولی نه! هر 24 ساعتی که کنترل زندگیت رو از دست میدی به امید این که توی آینده یه روزی از بلاتکلیفی در بیای، به همون اندازه 24 ساعت زندگی شرایطش رو سخت تر بهت تحمیل میکنه ما آدما خیلی متوهمیم که فکر میکنیم زندگی برام…

❤228👍34❤‍🔥17🔥5💯2😭1

25 Oct 2026, 09:20 UTC≈4,850 views78 reactionsread 5 November 2026

ما به خاطر آنچه داریم ثروتمند نیستیم، بلکه به خاطر آنچه میتوانیم بدون آن زندگی کنیم ثروتمندیم ایمانوئل کانت، یکی از بزرگترین فیلسوفان تاریخ و پدر فلسفه اخلاق گرایی واقعا ثروتمند بودن چه معنی داره؟ این حرفای کلیشه رو ول کنیم، شرایط و اوضاعمون هم که توی این وضعیت دردناکه و واقعا حوصله ندارم حتی بخوام هر روز به خودم یادآوریش کنم💔 اما خب سوال اینه آیا این که خودمون از زندگی خودمون راضی باشیم یعنی ثروتمند بودن؟ بعضیا …

❤61👍11🔥5🤯1

24 Oct 2026, 15:37 UTC≈4,890 views59 reactionsread 5 November 2026

ظاهرا خیلی ساده هست ولی خب وقتی روانشناسی مفهوم انضباط رو نگاه میکنی، تازه متوجه میشی اصلا ربطی به این ترفند های عجیب غریبی که میگن نداره! استمرار 3 اصل خیل ساده داره که توی این ویدئو با تمرین های فوق کاربردی دیوید گاگینز به سراغشون رفتیم 👇👇 https://youtu.be/MyMlueEaiaw?si=qQ1WW6GCXUOGZxsY

❤48👍5🔥3🤔3

24 Oct 2026, 12:20 UTC≈4,870 views97 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

روانشناسی استمرار دیوید گاگینز امروز ساعت 17:30 از یوتوب قدرت کلام یکی از ویدیو به شدت کاربردیه، حتما پیشنهادش میکنم🔥🔥

❤73🔥13👍7🤔2😭2

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @wordpowerss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Oct 2026, 13:33 UTCAnonymous Poll1,670 voters approx.

حالا که تو اینترنت زیاد دربارش حرف میزنن تو کمال گرایی یا عمل گرا؟

  1. کمال گرا49%
  2. عمل گرا16%
  3. والا خودمم نمیدونم !35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTCAnonymous Poll1,060 voters approx.

وقتی یه مشکلی تو زندگیت به وجود میاد، اولین واکنش ناخودآگاهت چیه؟ ( لطفا اون واکنشی رو بگو که انجامش میدی نه اون واکنشی که دلت میخواد!)

  1. نادیده میگیرم، اهمیت نمیدم21%
  2. سعی میکنم مثبت اندیش یاشم23%
  3. اون رو به عنوان یک فکت می‌پذیرم و شونه خالی نمیکنم36%
  4. دنبال یه راهی میگردم ازش به نفع خودم و بهتر شدنم استفاده کنم36%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Amir Tataloo | امیر تتلو
@Amirtataloo7 · 26,431
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قدرت کلام” (@wordpowerss), 16,865 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wordpowerss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.