The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
WoolyPooly SCAM!! Расследование
@woolyscam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
74subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001633101614 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @woolyscam |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 3 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/woolyscam |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 12:44 | 74 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 75 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 76 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 77 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 79 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:19 | 79 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 3 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
238 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 140 | 58.8% | |
| 🔥 | 56 | 23.5% | |
| 😢 | 17 | 7.14% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 6.30% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.84% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.84% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.42% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2023 to 1 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Привет всем. Давно не виделись. Спешу поделиться инфой касаемо acc-pool. Мутят с хешрейтом. Занижают его. Для меня он теперь тоже в черном списке.
👍23🔥3
В общем по Нексе расследование отменяется. Некса эксплорер показывает примерно 0 инфы о принадлежности инпутов к адресам с которых они были были взяты, а это значит, что даже если я смогу вытащить эти данные через свою ноду - меня закидают какашками сразу же, и обвинят в необъективности, т.к. я пользуюсь данными, которые прямо сейчас любой не сможет взять и проверить лично в эксплорере.
😢14👍6🤷♂1
Делаем расследование по NEXA
- Давай, жги77%
- Нет, з**бал уже со своими видосами. Мне пох*р.3%
- Пожалуйста не надо, я админ вулли.12%
- Посмотреть ответы8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤11👍2🔥1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHXftay1zjI
👍21🔥5❤1🎉1🏆1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTrtZtWnPMw В видео ничего нового относительно предыдущего поста. Просто засунул его в видос, для зрителей на ютубе.
👍16🔥1
Внимание! Вулли, примерно с середины вчерашнего дня, начали платить нормально. На фото результат работы моего калькулятора! Видно, что вчера резко сократилась комиссия, а сегодня не просто в 0, а +0.22% даже. Понятное дело, вряд ли там +0.22(пул чуть больше лака поймал), но убежден на 100%, что они не просто снизили комиссию до 0.9%, а вообще ее выключили. Предполагаю, что прямо сейчас кто-то из крупных блоггеров зар…
👍17🤔2🤣2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EXwF1XRkjE
🔥4👍1
зайдите пожалуйста на ютуб к нему, отсортируйте комменты по дате, и лайкните. Надо чтобы он увидел https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0J2HgcpHJ8 Это важно!
👍13💯1
Подкорректирую пост: Son Of Tech выпустил ролик, не самый однозначный. Проанализирую все сказанное и дам комментарий развернутый позже.
😢3🍌1
ребят, есть кто на herominers майнит длительное время со стабильным хешрейтом? Киньте мне пожалуйста номера кошельков в личку. Хотел их потестить, топ майнеров они не дают, бегать искать майнеров по блокчейну пока лень.
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @woolyscam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Делаем расследование по NEXA
- Давай, жги77%
- Нет, з**бал уже со своими видосами. Мне пох*р.3%
- Пожалуйста не надо, я админ вулли.12%
- Посмотреть ответы8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2023 to 1 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WoolyPooly SCAM!! Расследование” (@woolyscam), 74 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/woolyscam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.