Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for WOMEN SPACE 🖤

Channel

WOMEN SPACE 🖤

@womenspace_21

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,985subscribers

-72 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002175932450
TypeChannel
Username@womenspace_21
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/womenspace_21

Growth

6,9857,0577,0217 August 2026 — 7,057 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,056 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,041 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,024 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,011 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,008 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,994 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,985 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 22 days, net -72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,974–7,068 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 16:356,985-9
26 Aug 2026, 22:466,994-14
24 Aug 2026, 08:277,008-3
20 Aug 2026, 13:437,011-13
14 Aug 2026, 18:457,024-17
11 Aug 2026, 11:237,041-15
8 Aug 2026, 05:147,056-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:187,057first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.16%
avg views ÷ 6,985 subscribers
Avg views / post
361
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held35 (27 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total11,177
Reactions total286
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

361 reactions across 31 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17047.1%
🔥12434.3%
❤‍🔥5715.8%
🥰71.94%
👍20.554%
💋10.277%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC144 viewsread 20 August 2026

Если ты будешь часто это говорить, он захочет жениться на тебе 💍

19 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC167 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Твой мужчина хочет, чтобы ты делала это чаще... 🤫 (Спойлер: это не про борщ) Когда ты видишь такой заголовок, о чем ты думаешь? "Наверное, он хочет, чтобы я чаще молчала", "встречала его с улыбкой", "была покладистой" или "выглядела на 10 из 10 даже в пижаме". Спойлер: нет. И даже близко не это. Если спросить мужчин (тех, кто в здоровых и счастливых отношениях), чего им не хватает больше всего, ответ часто шокируе

8

18 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC271 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Жизнь проходит в каком-то вечном ожидании. Ожидании фильмов, книг, серий, событий, людей, автобусов. Зимы, весны, лета, осени. Звонков, сообщений, встреч. Зарплаты, теплой погоды, выходных. В ожидании того, что все изменится. В ожидании того, что однажды все будет хорошо. А нужно просто перестать ждать и наконец-то начать жить. Эльчин Сафарли© ("Рецепты счастья") Роскошные мои, согласны? - ❤️

13🔥6🥰3

18 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC256 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Завтра мы начинаем. Или ты снова отложишь "на потом, когда буду готова". "Когда похудею". "Когда разберусь с работой". "Когда буду в настроении". "Когда стану увереннее". Знаешь, в чём парадокс? Уверенность, лёгкость и присутствие, которых ты ждёшь, - это и есть то, что мы создаём внутри марафона. Не до. Не вместо. Во время. Тебе не нужно быть готовой. Тебе нужно быть живой и любопытной. Что ты получишь: ✅ 7 дней

5

17 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC293 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Не подавляйте в себе эмоции Часть 1. "Не плачь". "Не злись". "Не выдумывай". "Будь выше этого". "У других хуже". "Соберись". "Хорошие девочки не капризничают". "Ничего страшного не случилось". Сколько раз мы слышали это в детстве? Сколько раз повторили это себе сами, став взрослыми? И сколько эмоций за эти годы было проглочено, задвинуто, заперто в теле - потому что "нельзя", "не вовремя", "неудобно", "что подумают

8🔥7

16 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC401 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Через 7 дней ты перестанешь терять себя. Марафон "Твой магнетизм" от WOMEN SPACE не про трансформацию в "идеальную версию". Он про возвращение к той, кто уже есть. Но без груза правил, масок и фоновой тревоги "а вдруг я не так выгляжу". Что изменится? ⚪ Ты будешь заходить в контакт без внутреннего напряжения ⚪ Перестанешь заполнять молчание словами из страха ⚪ Научишься отличать живой интерес от цифровой погони ⚪ Р

4

16 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC371 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Главный секрет изобилия дома - не в вещах. Он в энергии. Мы часто ищем "волшебный рецепт": купить "правильную" вазу, переставить мебель по схеме, найти талисман. Но настоящее изобилие начинается не с расстановки предметов, а с того, чем наполнено пространство между ними. Тишиной или напряжением? Благодарностью или хронической усталостью? Жизнью или хранением "на всякий случай"? Дом - это не склад. Это живой организ

13

15 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC474 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

"Стараться понравиться" считывается как дефицит. "Быть в контакте с собой" - как ресурс. За первые 200 миллисекунд мозг сканирует не твои слова, а тонус плеч, ритм дыхания и микродвижения глаз. Если тело транслирует, "я напряжена, оцениваю, боюсь ошибиться" - включается дистанция. Даже если ты говоришь идеально правильные вещи. Магнетизм рождается не в голове. Он рождается в нервной системе. Когда ты в ресурсе, теб

❤‍🔥6

14 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC459 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Sекs-пауза в отношениях: кризис или норма? 🛑❤️ "Мы стали просто соседями", "Я чувствую себя непривлекательной", "Любовь ушла?" - эти мысли знакомы многим парам, столкнувшимся с временным отсутствием sекsа. Сразу хорошая новость: периоды затишья в постели - это нормально. Это не всегда приговор отношениям. Часто это сигнал, что нужно что-то настроить, а не выбрасывать. Давайте разберемся, почему это происходит и ка

11

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @womenspace_21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@womenspace_21 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Любовь и покорность
@pokornosttt · 40,517
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Любовник Голубев
@lovergolubev · 114,159
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WOMEN SPACE 🖤” (@womenspace_21), 6,985 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/womenspace_21.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.