Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝙒𝙀𝙑𝙛’𝙨 π™‹π™§π™žπ™«π™–π™©π™š π˜Όπ™‘π™₯𝙝𝙖 🐺

Channel

𝙒𝙀𝙑𝙛’𝙨 π™‹π™§π™žπ™«π™–π™©π™š π˜Όπ™‘π™₯𝙝𝙖 🐺

@wolfsalphacalls

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

1,452subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002162496051
TypeChannel
Username@wolfsalphacalls
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wolfsalphacalls

Growth

1,4521,4831,467.57 August 2026 β€” 1,483 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 1,483 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 1,479 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 1,472 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 1,463 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 1,457 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 1,452 subscribers7 August 202620 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 13 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,447–1,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 14:191,452-5
17 Aug 2026, 23:021,457-6
15 Aug 2026, 02:051,463-9
11 Aug 2026, 13:551,472-7
8 Aug 2026, 04:591,479-4
7 Aug 2026, 21:481,483no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:471,483first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
44.4%
avg views Γ· 1,452 subscribers
Avg views / post
644
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.931%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 July 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total1,933
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀4347.8%
πŸ”₯1718.9%
🀝1415.6%
πŸ‘€88.89%
❀‍πŸ”₯44.44%
🀯33.33%
😱11.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 02:42 UTC629 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Update: It looks like Telegram is already back on the App Store. Probably a temporary removal or issue

❀2🀝2🀯1

4 Aug 2026, 02:41 UTC654 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Fuckk man 😳 Just saw this : ALERT: Telegram was reportedly removed from the iOS App Store worldwide Apple hasn’t provided a reason yet, and neither Apple nor Telegram has released an official statement. Existing installations appear to still be working

❀2🀯2😱1

31 Jul 2026, 01:56 UTC650 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The supplements I take daily : β€’ Creatine β€’ Magnesium β€’ Zinc β€’ Vitamin D3 + K2 β€’ Omega-3 Small habits. Big difference. Invest in yourself first 🐺.

❀4πŸ”₯2🀝2

22 Jul 2026, 23:57 UTCβ‰ˆ1,290 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Been watching $GEN for a while and these mfers have actually been building They already got a launchpad, token + liquidity lockers, TG buybot and a security scanner catching sketchy contracts And they’re still cooking Sitting around $100K MC rn. Liquidity is still pretty low tho, so keep that in mind Do with that what you want

❀8πŸ”₯6🀝3

19 Jul 2026, 22:30 UTCβ‰ˆ1,250 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

$ARQ breaking into price discovery πŸ‘ΉπŸ”₯ Been telling y’all this one was different The trenches are heating up again and $ARQ will be leading the fucking charge Hope you’re positioned

❀2πŸ”₯1🀝1

19 Jul 2026, 00:13 UTCβ‰ˆ1,240 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Fuckkk man feels so fucking good to be FULLY locked in again. Believe it or not, the trenches are about to get fucking HOT again. I’m getting positioned again before the whole timeline wakes the fuck up. If you’re still sitting on the sidelines doing fuck all, that’s on you. Y’all know what the fuck happens when I lock in BANGER after BANGER after fucking BANGER πŸΊπŸ‘Ή Back on demon time Turn all notifications ON …

❀2🀝2

18 Jul 2026, 20:17 UTCβ‰ˆ1,210 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/matrixwolfx/status/2078574311732826257?s=46

18 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTCβ‰ˆ1,240 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Aped into $ARQ Been watching Arqen for a while and finally pulled the trigger The way they’re building leveraged trading on Solana feels different Early days but the chart looks clean https://dexscreener.com/solana/59cbVFRS9GSYeMPVrNQtDyzGnaN8o3fyWZcPJxFuNZjD

❀2πŸ‘€2🀝1

16 Jul 2026, 22:48 UTCβ‰ˆ1,230 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The Only Way to Win The second you stop believing you can make it, you’ve already lost You don’t catch the biggest runners by thinking small You don’t hold through the trenches without conviction You don’t keep showing up building your network, finding plays early and pushing when everyone else is quiet unless you truly believe where you’re headed I’ve seen enough in this market to know one thing : The biggest …

❀3❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ”₯1🀝1

15 Jul 2026, 20:43 UTC599 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Grown men are still out here hoping and wishing for shit Fuck that shit https://x.com/matrixwolfx/status/2077493204098674807?s=46

❀2πŸ”₯2❀‍πŸ”₯1

14 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC602 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I’ve had enough of getting my shit copied and front-run🀒 https://x.com/matrixwolfx/status/2077058712393425107?s=46

❀2❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸ”₯1

14 Jul 2026, 01:29 UTC611 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Let’s go a little deeper on $LEMON πŸ‹ I actually think this is one of the more interesting projects on Robinhood Chain right now. The idea is simple. AI is becoming a huge part of crypto but most AI tools expose what you’re doing. If you’re running strategies on-chain people can see them and copy your moves. $LEMON fixes that by keeping everything private, so your data and alpha stay yours. The tokenomics are clea…

❀2πŸ‘€2πŸ”₯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wolfsalphacalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ™’π™€π™‘π™›β€™π™¨ π™‹π™§π™žπ™«π™–π™©π™š π˜Όπ™‘π™₯𝙝𝙖 πŸΊβ€ (@wolfsalphacalls), 1,452 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wolfsalphacalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.