Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Wojnicz - Émancipation

Channel

Wojnicz - Émancipation

@wojnicz_me

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,186subscribers

-32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001843328252
TypeChannel
Username@wojnicz_me
Created4 January 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wojnicz_me

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,1866,2196,202.57 August 2026 — 6,218 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,217 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,219 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,215 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,212 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,209 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,217 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,214 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,217 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,205 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,196 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,189 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,186 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,181–6,224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 23:396,186-3
13 Sept 2026, 00:186,189-7
8 Sept 2026, 16:156,196-9
3 Sept 2026, 00:366,205-12
30 Aug 2026, 18:136,217+3
27 Aug 2026, 14:076,214-3
24 Aug 2026, 11:076,217+8
20 Aug 2026, 10:436,209-3
17 Aug 2026, 11:526,212-3
14 Aug 2026, 00:436,215-4
10 Aug 2026, 12:156,219+2
7 Aug 2026, 22:516,217-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:466,218first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

616 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍29748.2%
25240.9%
🔥243.90%
🙏203.25%
👏121.95%
😁101.62%
👎10.162%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 616 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC≈1,350 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

▶️ MiCA, la contre attaque ! La contrainte indirecte est une technique de la Matrice pour vous attraper via des intermédiaires. Cela rappelle des heures sombres de notre histoire moderne où il fallait un QR code pour boire un café en terrasse... 😐 En finances, c'est la même ! Ils contraignent des sociétés à vous balancer, sous peine de ne plus pouvoir exercer. Oui, l'étau se resserre ! 🎉 Bonne nouvelle : Pour ceux

18👍12😁1

9 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC≈2,050 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

▶️ La réponse, c'est la Finance Décentralisée "DeFi" ! Avec les nombreuses dingueries que nous préparent l'UE, j'ai dû accélérer la réponse immunitaire aux virus Mica, DAC8, CARF, ID/Euro numérique et autres cochonneries d'Eurogoulag ! La bonne nouvelle ? - On peut échapper à tout ça ! Une autre bonne nouvelle ? - On peut totalement se passer des banques ! Qu'est-ce que cela signifie ? - Débancarisation jusqu'au

👍177🙏5😁1

2 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC≈2,510 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026

▶️ L'importance des VPN ! Gadget numérique à la mode ou outil indispensable ? Je vous interpelle sur votre hygiène numérique dans cette petite vidéo : https://youtube.com/shorts/Ewc6gztxb5E Et je vous dis tout dans mon dernier eBook 👉 "VPN : L'arme pacifique contre la surveillance numérique" Voilà une petite piquouse de rappel (je sais que vous adorez ça 😁💉) quant à votre hygiène numérique avant la terrible réali

16👍10🙏6

1 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC≈2,140 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026

▶️ Festival Nexus - Bilan & suite de nos aventures ! Je vous fais un petit retour sur cet événement qui a été formidable ! Quant à la suite : - Je vais vous proposer de refaire la conférence que j'ai donné sur place et qui a visiblement déclenché beaucoup de déclics 🤯 Vous étiez très nombreux sur place pour la mise en pratique des dingueries que je vous ai révélé sur scène 🙂👍 - Dans ma prochaine newsletter qui so

22👍18👏2🔥2

27 Jun 2026, 10:43 UTC≈2,200 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026

▶️ En direct du festival Nexus C'est un plaisir de vous retrouver la bas ! Une énergie folle ! 😊 Pour rappel : 📍 Samedi 27 juin à 14h30 : conférence sur la petite scène 📍 Dimanche 28 juin à 11h30 : atelier « Acquérir sa souveraineté numérique » dans le Barnum Ateliers (~1h30) 📍 Directement sur mon stand car je serai présent tout le week-end 🙂 Plus qu'un festival, une grande fête ! Soyez branché ! 🔌⚡️ -- ☀️ Wojnic

39👍5😁1

22 May 2026, 10:27 UTC≈4,110 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚨 L’avenir de notre liberté numérique se joue maintenant ! Sous prétexte de “sécurité”, Google verrouille progressivement Android, restreint les applications indépendantes, limite les permissions, bloque certains outils libres et pousse un modèle où seuls les géants validés auront encore le droit d’exister. Quant à Apple, ils assument cela depuis le début... Le problème dépasse largement les smartphones. Nous allo

👍1910🔥10👏3👎1

21 May 2026, 16:01 UTC≈2,490 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026

▶️ Et si Internet disparaissait demain ? Plus d’électricité, plus de réseau, plus de communications, plus d’échanges… Le scénario du blackout soulève une vraie question : à quel point notre monde est-il devenu dépendant d’infrastructures centralisées ? Pourtant, il existe déjà des alternatives libres, décentralisées et résilientes que chacun peut mettre en place à son échelle. Chaque individu qui rejoint et renforc

👍248

14 May 2026, 17:53 UTC≈2,640 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026

L'Euro numérique : l'arnaque du siècle ❗ Vous savez probablement déjà à quel point ce projet est liberticide, mais en connaissez vous la réelle portée ? Ce petit reportage signé MoneyRadar est une belle réalisation, autant sur la forme que sur le fond, suffisamment concis et percutant pour être accessible et créer ce fameux déclic salvateur : #Débancarisation #Décentralisation ! Partagez ! Personne ne devrait se f

👍33🔥1😁1

11 May 2026, 17:26 UTC≈2,630 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

▶️ 1er Festival du magazine Nexus J'aurai le plaisir de vous retrouvez en chair, en os et en authenticité ! 😁 📍 Samedi 27 juin à 14h30 : conférence sur la petite scène 📍 Dimanche 28 juin à 11h30 : atelier « Acquérir sa souveraineté numérique » dans le Barnum Ateliers (~1h30) 📍 Directement sur mon stand car je serai présent tout le week-end 🙂 Places limitées ! Info & Inscription 👉 https://magazine.nexus.fr/festival

25👍10🔥1

7 May 2026, 15:01 UTC≈2,500 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Merci pour votre participation au sondage https://t.me/wojnicz_me/441 Les résultats sont très intéressants et permettent de mieux comprendre où chacun se situe dans sa relation à l'investissement financier. Ce qui ressort très clairement, c’est qu’une grande partie d’entre vous souhaite avancer… mais manque encore de repères, de confiance ou de méthode. 📊 Entre : • ceux qui veulent investir mais ne savent pas par

👍3816🙏3👏1

5 May 2026, 17:21 UTC≈1,900 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Où en êtes-vous avec l’investissement ?

  1. Je n’ai jamais investi et ça ne m’intéresse pas4%
  2. Je n’ai jamais investi mais ça m’intrigue7%
  3. J’aimerais investir mais j’ai peur / des blocages13%
  4. Je veux investir mais je ne sais pas par où commencer23%
  5. J’ai déjà investi un peu (débutant)25%
  6. J’investis régulièrement10%
  7. Je suis à l’aise et expérimenté3%
  8. J’ai déjà investi mais avec de mauvaises expériences17%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍95

5 May 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,920 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

▶️ Inflation 👉 Solution ! Parvenez-vous à faire face à l'inflation, sans constamment perdre en pouvoir d'achat, en épargne ? Certes, en débancarisant l'épargne est largement meilleure. Mais avez-vous déjà songé à aller plus loin en investissant ? Ci-après un sondage pour partager là où vous en êtes ⤵️ https://youtube.com/shorts/FFAxwVcw8TQ Restez branché ! 🔌⚡ -- ☀️ Wojnicz émancipation individuelle & collective

👍12🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wojnicz_me. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 May 2026, 17:21 UTCAnonymous Poll242 voters

Où en êtes-vous avec l’investissement ?

  1. Je n’ai jamais investi et ça ne m’intéresse pas4%
  2. Je n’ai jamais investi mais ça m’intrigue7%
  3. J’aimerais investir mais j’ai peur / des blocages13%
  4. Je veux investir mais je ne sais pas par où commencer23%
  5. J’ai déjà investi un peu (débutant)25%
  6. J’investis régulièrement10%
  7. Je suis à l’aise et expérimenté3%
  8. J’ai déjà investi mais avec de mauvaises expériences17%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 16 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wojnicz - Émancipation” (@wojnicz_me), 6,186 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wojnicz_me.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.